BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Wrong. Republicans donāt stop people from voting. But we do seek to prevent fraudulent voting. Sorry if that gives you an ouchie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong. Republicans donāt stop people from voting. But we do seek to prevent fraudulent voting. Sorry if that gives you an ouchie.
Thatās not a fact superbadbreath. Itās just your racist opinion. And it isnāt worth diddly dog.You wouldn't know a FACT if it hit you in your racist ass, I have a FACT for you. You are one white, stupid ass, racist hag.
Colored checkGiven the fact that she was nominated on the basis of her skin color and her gender, questioning her actual qualifications is perfectly appropriate...
Only because a dolt like you tried to use one example of racist thinking as constituting proof that all conservatives must be racist or are racist.
I love your blatant racism. You are the albatros around the neck of conservatism.
All conservatives are either racists or morons but that's besides the political point I was making. This particular racist belief is held by enough conservatives that it allows us to paint you all with a convincing enough broad brush, politically speaking. Racists like him will eventually drag you all down.Only because a dolt like you tried to use one example of racist thinking as constituting proof that all conservatives must be racist or are racist.![]()
The fallacy is in you not understanding the context of my comments.Your purposeful use of fallacy undercuts the very argument youād like to make.
When you say it's not a winning debate what do you mean? Do you mean she isn't going to be confirmed or that even though she is you are still going to feel she isnt qualified? Because if the later, what the fuck makes you think I give a shit about your hurt feelings? Your feelings aren't evidence in a debate little cuck.Opppsiton to this nominee should be over her qualification or alleged lack thereof. Thatās not a winning debate issue for those who support her.
Bashing Biden for nominating the first black woman to the Court is a losing political move in a growing diverse and progressive population but I understand why you do it. Not appeasing the white racists is political suicide with a bullet and appeasing white racists is suicide by slow and painful poison. What racists who aren't mouth breathers that need to beat their chest should do is jettison the overt racists and form a coalition with moderate undercover racists like Manchin. That at least buys you some more time.Opposition to basing the nominationās selection criteria on race and gender is a good basis to castigate Brandon. It is not helpful in addressing the nomineeās qualifications, however.
If you think you can be a bit more clever with your racism than the idiots in this thread be my guest. I enjoy a good chuckle.Opposition to the nomineeās confirmation based on her race or gender is obviously stupid, ignorant and lacking in merit.
So basically the same vanilla partisan rhetoric everyone on both sides does? How boring. I honestly didn't have a problem with Trump's picks other than the fact that he got to pick in the first place. The President gets to nominate whoever the fuck he wants and the Senate confirms. If you don't want that to happen win the Presidential election. It's a political position and the only people who should be fooled otherwise are children who still think it's Santa leaving them gifts on Christmas eve. Of course I'm going to disagree with the majority of decisions from the nominees of the rival party (though I think we've gotten the best case scenario with Roberts), that doesn't make them unqualified. Stop being little bitches.I reiterate something I said before: opposition to this particular nomineeās confirmation is miost properly based on the likelihood that she will allow partisan politics to be the basis for her decisions rather than having the Constitution and the law (and logic and justice) be the deciding factors.
Well then maybe you can explain to me what's wrong with the mutants and morons from the right in this thread suggesting being a black woman makes her inherently unqualified.I think she is qualified. Sheās well educated. She has experience. I donāt know that she will make her judicial sections on the proper bases. But I also think weāll find out soon enough. I donāt foresee her not getting confirmed. Pretty much inevitable.
No racism to see here, folks.The best Justice on the Supreme Court is Black. Having him on the Supreme Court puts the demographics to be aligned with the racial demographics of the US.
However, the filthy demented sicko racist Democrats can't stand the fact that he is real American and not a Libtard piece of shit dumbass ghetto mentality Neggra. That is why Potatohead is putting an unqualified Negro bitch on the Court. To kiss the ass of racist Libtard assholes. "You ain't a Negro unless you are a sicko Liberal." Despicable, isn't it Moon Bat?
You are confused Moon Bat. The racism is the violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by President Potatohead by blatantly using race as the criteria for a Federal job.
Colored check
Vagina check
Qualified hmmm
I stopped reading your blather after your absolutely tragically retarded opening line. Oh well. I guess you canāt help being a total douche. You donāt even try.All conservatives are either racists or morons but that's besides the political point I was making. This particular racist belief is held by enough conservatives that it allows us to paint you all with a convincing enough broad brush, politically speaking. Racists like him will eventually drag you all down.
The fallacy is in you not understanding the context of my comments.
When you say it's not a winning debate what do you mean? Do you mean she isn't going to be confirmed or that even though she is you are still going to feel she isnt qualified? Because if the later, what the fuck makes you think I give a shit about your hurt feelings? Your feelings aren't evidence in a debate little cuck.
Bashing Biden for nominating the first black woman to the Court is a losing political move in a growing diverse and progressive population but I understand why you do it. Not appeasing the white racists is political suicide with a bullet and appeasing white racists is suicide by slow and painful poison. What racists who aren't mouth breathers that need to beat their chest should do is jettison the overt racists and form a coalition with moderate undercover racists like Manchin. That at least buys you some more time.
If you think you can be a bit more clever with your racism than the idiots in this thread be my guest. I enjoy a good chuckle.
So basically the same vanilla partisan rhetoric everyone on both sides does? How boring. I honestly didn't have a problem with Trump's picks other than the fact that he got to pick in the first place. The President gets to nominate whoever the fuck he wants and the Senate confirms. If you don't want that to happen win the Presidential election. It's a political position and the only people who should be fooled otherwise are children who still think it's Santa leaving them gifts on Christmas eve. Of course I'm going to disagree with the majority of decisions from the nominees of the rival party (though I think we've gotten the best case scenario with Roberts), that doesn't make them unqualified. Stop being little bitches.
Well then maybe you can explain to me what's wrong with the mutants and morons from the right in this thread suggesting being a black woman makes her inherently unqualified.
I'm being honest about my assessment of conservative voters, sorry if that hurts your feelings soy boy.I stopped reading your blather after your absolutely tragically retarded opening line. Oh well. I guess you canāt help being a total douche. You donāt even try.
That's right, the women are smarter. Certainly not all, but Shirley in general.![]()
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is One of the Most Qualified Nominees for the Supreme Court Ever - Demand Justice
JACKSON WOULD BRING AN UNPARALLELED BREADTH AND DEPTH OF EXPERIENCE Jackson would be the most experienced trial court judge to join the Supreme Court in almost a century. Jackson served on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for nearly 8 years, giving her more trial...demandjustice.org
There's a saying from years ago that applies just as well today:
A woman has to be twice as good as a man to go half as far. Fortunately, to be twice as good as a man isn't that hard.
We get it. We checked both boxes; vagina and dark skin.![]()
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is One of the Most Qualified Nominees for the Supreme Court Ever - Demand Justice
JACKSON WOULD BRING AN UNPARALLELED BREADTH AND DEPTH OF EXPERIENCE Jackson would be the most experienced trial court judge to join the Supreme Court in almost a century. Jackson served on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for nearly 8 years, giving her more trial...demandjustice.org
My feelings? Lol. Nah. Just your own credibility. Or, lack thereof.I'm being honest about my assessment of conservative voters, sorry if that hurts your feelings soy boy.
But we both know that isn't why you couldn't respond. Everything I said rings true both objectively and politically.
The racist is sitting in the oval office drooling into his oatmeal.No racism to see here, folks.![]()
And yet you continue to respond, not to address the substance, but only for the back and forth name calling. I don't mind name calling but if you can't pair it with good arguments all you're doing is crying and griping. You can only call me names but you can't offer sound rebuttals because my arguments are superior.My feelings? Lol. Nah. Just your own credibility. Or, lack thereof.
I actually stopped reading your imbecile post at that first sentence. Youāre not worth even this much time. Youāre just a joke.
I do. I chose when and to whom to respond. You get no vote in it.And yet you continue to respond, not to address the substance, but only for the back and forth name calling. I don't mind name calling but if you can't pair it with good arguments all you're doing is crying and griping. You can only call me names but you can't offer sound rebuttals because my arguments are superior.
Why do say that like a sacred little child reciting a mantra to keep them safe?I do. I chose when and to whom to respond. You get no vote in it.
Look at you, a sad, transparent cuck like you can't even quote what you think I'm wrong about. No more specifics for you ever since I shit all over your argument. All you got left are implications that I said thing that you think is wrong. What thing? Who the fuck knows.You can make your typically shallow and false claims about me (such as your erroneous speculation that I read the balance of that initial post). Your guesswork is wrong and if I elect to tell you so, youāre free to believe or disbelieve. I canāt help your stupidity. Thatās all on you.
My arguments are brilliant but by your own admission you were too afraid and emotionally traumatized to address them.The point is that when you start-off a post with such an idiotic assertion, you lose all credibility. You have leave to now gfy.
![]()
![]()
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is One of the Most Qualified Nominees for the Supreme Court Ever - Demand Justice
JACKSON WOULD BRING AN UNPARALLELED BREADTH AND DEPTH OF EXPERIENCE Jackson would be the most experienced trial court judge to join the Supreme Court in almost a century. Jackson served on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for nearly 8 years, giving her more trial...demandjustice.org
There's a saying from years ago that applies just as well today:
A woman has to be twice as good as a man to go half as far. Fortunately, to be twice as good as a man isn't that hard.