Biden Courts and their Soft Coup

[Edgetho]

I couldn't agree more. The Democratic Party has morphed into a true anti-American Regime whose ONLY INTEREST is regaining and growing their power. They care NOTHING about the good of the American people. Zero, zip. nada.

100% correct. Which is why I call them dimocrap scum. The Democrat Party died with JFK. Not that he was all that great (he wasn't) be he was the last true Democrat.

LBJ was just an incompetent, racist, criminal, southern democrat that though he could unite the whole party under him if he could get that deal with MLK to stick (I'll have those N-words voting democrat for 200 years!!). But Viet Nam took him down.

When they mounted that "Read my Lips" campaign against Bush 41 and Ross The Insane Pirogi fucked us in the @$$ that was the end of the Democrat Party, because.....

Bill The Rapist Clinton and his Wife, Ubercunt, changed the Party. Then The Bastard Son of Frank Marshall Davis put the party in the shitter.

It would be nice to have a Democrat Party that still loved their Country. It would be nice to have a choice. But we don't. You can NOT love your Country and vote for a dimocrap. Just can't do it.

It's like the guy that claims to love his wife -- Except for her hair. Honey, you gotta do something about your hair. And lose some weight. And your clothes, they just ain't right. And wear more make-up and your voice.... Well, it's just grating. And while you're at it, do something about your teethn and the way you walk.... You look like a truck driver. And your table manners just suck. But not as much as your friends and relatives.

But I love you.

Yeah, right. That's what dimocrap scum are trying to sell. They hate everything about America. We're racist, Misogynistic and murder babies in Gaza. They call half of America Fascists and Rednecks and losers/

But never accuse them of being unpatriotic. They just want to improve us. Just like that guy wants his Wife to lose weight and wear different makeup and color her hair and brush her teeth and find new friends and wear different clothes and ....................

dimocraps are scum

 

[Foxfyre]

I believe the 2024 election was a true turning point election. We were in a slow downward spiral due to decades of unchecked greed, corruption and Democrat infiltration into US institutions and companies. Trump and his cabinet have the controls now and for the first time in a long time I am optimistic about the prospects of them turning it around.

Exactly. The 2024 election win for Trump was for what he promised to do, what the people wanted him to do. If the courts are successful in stopping him from doing it, then we no longer have a representative republic and The U.S. Constitution is worthless.

 

[Independent thinker]

The constitutional debate is underway as to what executive authority the President will have in an unprecedented effort by mostly Biden courts to stop President Trump from reorganizing the federal government to be a government of, by and for the people. That includes letting go all those who are unnecessary, incompetent, inefficient, ineffective, and most of all corrupt and/or actively working against the intentions of the Administration and Congress.

It is almost certain that sometime in the relatively near future, SCOTUS will make its ruling on whether President Trump can do what he wants to do, what he was elected to do.

The Supreme Court's Golden Opportunity to Restore Trump's Authority Amid an Onslaught of Leftist Lawfare

President Trump faces a torrent of leftist lawfare against his constitutional authority. Now, the Supreme Court can address it.

www.dailysignal.com

Trump may not possibly get this all done in four years but he is certainly laying the groundwork for reorganizing the federal government.

 

[Foxfyre]

Of course not.

And as far as I know, no such independent agency exists in the U.S.

Closest is the CFPB, which doesn’t have to go to Congress for funding. But the president controls it and Congress can end it, so long as the president signs.

The Fed is pretty darn close. The courts said the fired Inspector General protecting whistleblowers was immune from firing, etc. etc. etc. All the court cases pretty much are intended to stop Trump from reorganizing the government.

 

[Foxfyre]

Trump may not possibly get this all done in four years but he is certainly laying the groundwork for reorganizing the federal government.

Yes. And if Vance is faithful in the MAGA vision shared with Trump and we elect him in 2028, he can continue the process of restoring the government to be of, for and by the people.

 

[Edgetho]

Exactly. The 2024 election win for Trump was for what he promised to do, what the people wanted him to do. If the courts are successful in stopping him from doing it, then we no longer have a representative republic and The U.S. Constitution is worthless.

The Courts can only stop OMB if he wants them to. More Precisely, if the DOJ allows it. And Pam Bondi isn't likely to side with the Judicial system over Trump. I get the impression she doesn't like Judges a whole lot. But Trump can fire her if he has to. Which I doubt.....

He can ignore them and -- There ain't a goddam thing they can do about it. Congress can impeach him, but they'd lose that bid. The People can vote against his party in 2026.

That's about it. And I'm not sure that a majority of people wouldn't approve of him ignoring the Courts.

If the Courts don't get their shit together and put a leash on these dimocrap scumbag Judges, it could happen.

 

[berg80]

The constitutional debate is underway as to what executive authority the President will have in an unprecedented effort by mostly Biden courts to stop President Trump from reorganizing the federal government to be a government of, by and for the people.

You need to work on your phrasing to more closely reflect reality.

Judges appointed by prez's from both parties have blocked a good deal of trump's agenda as they weigh whether he has exceeded the authority of the executive by firing federal employees protected from politically motivated decisions, stopping payments of money appropriated by Congress, and eliminating agencies without congressional approval.

 

[Foxfyre]

You need to work on your phrasing to more closely reflect reality.

Judges appointed by prez's from both parties have blocked a good deal of trump's agenda as they weigh whether he has exceeded the authority of the executive by firing federal employees protected from politically motivated decisions, stopping payments of money appropriated by Congress, and eliminating agencies without congressional approval.

The courts are not given any constitutional power to block Trump's authority. That is the prerogative of Congress and even there the only authority they have in that regard is to pass legislation restricting funding and/or impeachment.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The Fed is pretty darn close. The courts said the fired Inspector General protecting whistleblowers was immune from firing, etc. etc. etc. All the court cases pretty much are intended to stop Trump from reorganizing the government.

Counting on the Supremes to explain the law.

 

[Foxfyre]

Counting on the Supremes to explain the law.

The purpose of the courts is to interpret the law, not make it. That is true of all the courts from the bottom all the way to SCOTUS.

 

[berg80]

The courts are not given any constitutional power to block Trump's authority.

The courts are empowered to enforce the law. The questions before the courts having to do with the limits of the prez's legal authority.

Are you of the opinion the prez gets to decide unilaterally what laws he can break?

 

[Foxfyre]

The courts are empowered to enforce the law. The questions before the courts having to do with the limits of the prez's legal authority.

Are you of the opinion the prez gets to decide unilaterally what laws he can break?

The courts are not empowered to enforce the law. The courts are empowered to conduct trials of persons indicted for crimes and apply the proper laws to a trial and sentencing.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The purpose of the courts is to interpret the law, not make it. That is true of all the courts from the bottom all the way to SCOTUS.

It is also also up to the higher courts to spank the lower courts when they are in error as they are now with Donald Trump.

 

[Foxfyre]

It is also also up to the higher courts to spank the lower courts when they are in error as they are now with Donald Trump.

Higher courts can overrule lower courts yes. But no court is given constitutional authority to interfere with or govern the President of the United States.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Higher courts can overrule lower courts yes. But no court is given constitutional authority to interfere with or govern the President of the United States.

Yes, I agree. I think you misunderstand me, but I frequently misunderstand you so no harm no foul.

 

[Foxfyre]

Yes, I agree. I think you misunderstand me, but I frequently misunderstand you so no harm no foul.

When I make a definitive statement it does not necessarily disagree with somebody but sometimes it does. But I'm pretty sure we're on the same page on this issue so yeah. It's all good.

 

[Mac1958]

The courts are empowered to enforce the law. The questions before the courts having to do with the limits of the prez's legal authority.

Are you of the opinion the prez gets to decide unilaterally what laws he can break?

They're no longer into that whole "separation of powers" and "co-equal branches of government" thing any more.

All of a sudden, they want as much power as possible concentrated in one place, the Oval Office. With their demigod. Where it belongs.

But they really dig the Constitution 'n stuff, believe me.