- Thread starter
- #201
"Past grievances" are the symptoms of the current problem. Current International law doesn't deal with national sovereignty", people do and should. People in the US committed the crimes destroying that sovereignty. That is an act of war already carried out.It is the point, because you were quoting Trump, and Trump, as always, was lying about that. The Mexican government and the flow of illegals is our fault. Do we need to discuss my link so you can understand fully the consequences of invading other countries by taking over their governments, job opportunities, resources, and way of life? Imperial Borders and Mythical Frontiers - TheHumanist.comWhich was a total lie, because Mexico wasn't sending these people. Mexican people were sending themselves because of the decades long oppression the US imposed on Mexico and the rest of the central and South American countries; CIA in South America | Geopolitical MonitorHe did say all of those things!! I know you probably get all your news and talking points from conservative shows and your numb, conservative brain doesn't want to face the facts.Um, numbnuts; it's not race bait its the truth bitch!! HERES a list of a few things: 1.All Mexicans are rapist.
Except he never said that. That you open with a lie, shows that your gish galloping list deserves no more consideration.
My point stands. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks, since the early 60s.
The vast majority of what has been called "Wacism" since then, was actually just differences of opinion on the best way to reach that.
That your side pretends otherwise, is you guy being a bunch of lying, race baiting whores.
This Divisive Clown of a wanna be Dictator caused and emboldened the wretches of this society to come out of the shadows and from under the white hoods.
So, the idea that you would boldly lie and say he didn't say those things tell me everything I need to know about you, that you like alot of you jackasses will defend Dear leader and what he said and did no matter what.
What he said was that illegals that Mexico sends us, and not their best people, and listed a number of examples, including "rapists" among other ways that those they send are flawed.
He specifically said that "some of them are nice people", to clarify for the slower among us, that he was not saying that "all " mexicans are like that, or even not all the illegals are like that.
Some are. Some are enough to be concerned about.
YOu are a fucking moron.
My point stands.
This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks, since the early 60s.
The vast majority of what has been called "Wacism" since then, was actually just differences of opinion on the best way to reach that.
That your side pretends otherwise, is you guy being a bunch of lying, race baiting whores.
1. Blaming the Mexican government for a flow of illegals coming out of Mexico is reasonable. And not really the point for either of us.
2. My point stands.
This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks, since the early 60s.
The vast majority of what has been called "Wacism" since then, was actually just differences of opinion on the best way to reach that.
That your side pretends otherwise, is you guy being a bunch of lying, race baiting whores.
If there was a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality in this country, "Section 8 Housing" would have never been a thing. But it was, and for a very good reason. The conspiracy was to pretend to integrate those populations, but when government housing was offered it moved Blacks into the same oppressed situation they've always been in. That practice continues to this day.
Tell me something, have you ever seen an educated Black man getting a banking, accounting, medical, Engineering job, etc. in Nebraska or South Dakota? No! Why is that? Because they don't hire Blacks out there. Racial equality has never been a thing, and stop pretending it is.
1. The idea that past grievances justifies current violations of national sovereignty is not supported by international law. Such behavior is an act of war.
2. We have had a big debate over the best way of achieving racial equality. YOur assumption that any outcome that was not to your liking, ie section 8 housing is because of wacism, does not make sense.
3. The population of Nebraska is FOUR percent black. That you don't see a lot of black bankers there, is not surprising.
4. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks, since the early 1960s. YOu need to stop living in the past.
Nothing you are claiming supports reality. Equality for Blacks has never been a thing. The fact that you acknowledge a four percent population of Blacks in Nebraska totally supports my claim. There aren't many there for a reason, and I told you that reason.