Biden barely campained at all... we know why

[bripat9643]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

I'm not quoting me, Bri. I'm quoting Bill Barr:

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Now why would I ignore the Attorney General and believe you?

You've never given me a good reason.

Out of context, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

Barr says he hasn't found any widespread fraud yet that could change the outcome of the election. Why on Earth would anyone in their right mind believe a fucking moron like you over Barr??

Barr hasn't looked yet, moron.

 

[Skylar]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

I'm not quoting me, Bri. I'm quoting Bill Barr:

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Now why would I ignore the Attorney General and believe you?

You've never given me a good reason.

Out of context, moron.

Says you, citing you. And you don't know what you're talking about.

Here's the entire article. Put it in context for us:

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

Or....keep fleeing. Either serves my purpose.

 

[bripat9643]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

He campaigned quite a bit actually. Trump never stopped campaigning so the comparison distorts reality.

I've never EVER seen a Presidential candidate who didn't campaign like Trump did...EXCEPT of course, Joe Biden! In the heat to the campaign when Trump was doing 3 and 4 rallies a day (like all candidates!) Joe Biden would take the whole day off.

1) The campaign was the middle of pandemic. Ask Herman Cain how responsible it was to be holding those events.

2) Trump in large measure defeated himself. The more people saw, the less people wanted. Its one of the reasons that Trump carried so few cities he campaigned in.

Trump carried few cities where the Democrats controlled the local election process. Cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis and Phoenix are where the numbers simply don't add up.

Explain why Phili, Detroit or Minneapolis would have gone to Trump.

Trump never polled well in any of those cities and lost them all in 2016. Why then would him losing cities he was polling poorly in and he had already lost once be evidence of fraud?

Your conspiracy doesn't make the slightest sense.

It's not that he would have won those cities, Skylar...it's that those cities had unprecedented turnout for Joe Biden...especially in ballots that were counted after the polls closed. Trump got more votes than he got in the last election but somehow a candidate that nobody on the Democratic side was excited about turned out more voters than any candidate in American election history? THAT doesn't make sense!

You grossly underestimate how poor a candidate Trump actually is. And how vulnerble he was with the poor economy, massive spike in unemployment, 250,000 COVID dead, and tens of thousands of closed businesses.

There's nothing particularly suspect about Trump losing cities that he lost in 2016. Or where he was polling poorly. Especially in a poorer economy.

Only the lowest kind of douchebag blames Trump for COVID and the shutdown.

Fucking moron.

"At the end of the 15-day period, we’ll make a decision as to which way we want to go, where we want to go, the timing. And essentially, we’re referring to the timing of the opening — essentially, the opening of our country, because we have it pretty well shut down in order to get rid of this invisible enemy." ~ Impeached Trump, 3.23.20​

Where does that prove that Trump shutdown the country?

 

[Skylar]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

Barr says he hasn't found any widespread fraud yet that could change the outcome of the election. Why on Earth would anyone in their right mind believe a fucking moron like you over Barr??

Barr hasn't looked yet, moron.

Says you, citing you. And you don't know what you're talking about.

Barr on the other hand has confirmed that US attorneys and FBI agents have investigated specific allegations and found nothing to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy:

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

You're aggressively ignorant, Bri. It doesn't help your argument.

 

[bripat9643]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

I'm not quoting me, Bri. I'm quoting Bill Barr:

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Now why would I ignore the Attorney General and believe you?

You've never given me a good reason.

Out of context, moron.

Says you, citing you. And you don't know what you're talking about.

Here's the entire article. Put it in context for us:

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

Or....keep fleeing. Either serves my purpose.

What part of "I'm not debating the talking points spewing machine" didn't you understand?

 

[Skylar]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

I'm not quoting me, Bri. I'm quoting Bill Barr:

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Now why would I ignore the Attorney General and believe you?

You've never given me a good reason.

Out of context, moron.

Says you, citing you. And you don't know what you're talking about.

Here's the entire article. Put it in context for us:

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

Or....keep fleeing. Either serves my purpose.

What part of "I'm not debating the talking points spewing machine" didn't you understand?

The part where you keep replying every time I refute your argument with evidence.

So much for your 'out of context' nonsense. When even you treat your accusations like meaningless garbage to be thrown on the rhetorical midden heap.....surely you'll understand when we treat your accusations the same way.

 

[bripat9643]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

I'm not quoting me, Bri. I'm quoting Bill Barr:

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Now why would I ignore the Attorney General and believe you?

You've never given me a good reason.

Out of context, moron.

Says you, citing you. And you don't know what you're talking about.

Here's the entire article. Put it in context for us:

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

Or....keep fleeing. Either serves my purpose.

What part of "I'm not debating the talking points spewing machine" didn't you understand?

The part where you keep replying every time I refute your argument with evidence.

So much for your 'out of context' nonsense. When even you treat your accusations like meaningless garbage to be thrown on the rhetorical midden heap.....surely you'll understand when we treat your accusations the same way.

I replay only by saying I'm not going to argue about your incessant bullshit talking points.

 

[Care4all]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

He campaigned quite a bit actually. Trump never stopped campaigning so the comparison distorts reality.

I've never EVER seen a Presidential candidate who didn't campaign like Trump did...EXCEPT of course, Joe Biden! In the heat to the campaign when Trump was doing 3 and 4 rallies a day (like all candidates!) Joe Biden would take the whole day off.

1) The campaign was the middle of pandemic. Ask Herman Cain how responsible it was to be holding those events.

2) Trump in large measure defeated himself. The more people saw, the less people wanted. Its one of the reasons that Trump carried so few cities he campaigned in.

Trump carried few cities where the Democrats controlled the local election process. Cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis and Phoenix are where the numbers simply don't add up.

Explain why Phili, Detroit or Minneapolis would have gone to Trump.

Trump never polled well in any of those cities and lost them all in 2016. Why then would him losing cities he was polling poorly in and he had already lost once be evidence of fraud?

Your conspiracy doesn't make the slightest sense.

It's not that he would have won those cities, Skylar...it's that those cities had unprecedented turnout for Joe Biden...especially in ballots that were counted after the polls closed. Trump got more votes than he got in the last election but somehow a candidate that nobody on the Democratic side was excited about turned out more voters than any candidate in American election history? THAT doesn't make sense!

You grossly underestimate how poor a candidate Trump actually is. And how vulnerble he was with the poor economy, massive spike in unemployment, 250,000 COVID dead, and tens of thousands of closed businesses.

There's nothing particularly suspect about Trump losing cities that he lost in 2016. Or where he was polling poorly. Especially in a poorer economy.

Only the lowest kind of douchebag blames Trump for COVID and the shutdown.

Fucking moron.

"At the end of the 15-day period, we’ll make a decision as to which way we want to go, where we want to go, the timing. And essentially, we’re referring to the timing of the opening — essentially, the opening of our country, because we have it pretty well shut down in order to get rid of this invisible enemy." ~ Impeached Trump, 3.23.20​

Where does that prove that Trump shutdown the country?

Trump and admin called all the governor's before Trump made the decision to lockdown.

 

[bripat9643]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

He campaigned quite a bit actually. Trump never stopped campaigning so the comparison distorts reality.

I've never EVER seen a Presidential candidate who didn't campaign like Trump did...EXCEPT of course, Joe Biden! In the heat to the campaign when Trump was doing 3 and 4 rallies a day (like all candidates!) Joe Biden would take the whole day off.

1) The campaign was the middle of pandemic. Ask Herman Cain how responsible it was to be holding those events.

2) Trump in large measure defeated himself. The more people saw, the less people wanted. Its one of the reasons that Trump carried so few cities he campaigned in.

Trump carried few cities where the Democrats controlled the local election process. Cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis and Phoenix are where the numbers simply don't add up.

Explain why Phili, Detroit or Minneapolis would have gone to Trump.

Trump never polled well in any of those cities and lost them all in 2016. Why then would him losing cities he was polling poorly in and he had already lost once be evidence of fraud?

Your conspiracy doesn't make the slightest sense.

It's not that he would have won those cities, Skylar...it's that those cities had unprecedented turnout for Joe Biden...especially in ballots that were counted after the polls closed. Trump got more votes than he got in the last election but somehow a candidate that nobody on the Democratic side was excited about turned out more voters than any candidate in American election history? THAT doesn't make sense!

You grossly underestimate how poor a candidate Trump actually is. And how vulnerble he was with the poor economy, massive spike in unemployment, 250,000 COVID dead, and tens of thousands of closed businesses.

There's nothing particularly suspect about Trump losing cities that he lost in 2016. Or where he was polling poorly. Especially in a poorer economy.

Only the lowest kind of douchebag blames Trump for COVID and the shutdown.

Fucking moron.

"At the end of the 15-day period, we’ll make a decision as to which way we want to go, where we want to go, the timing. And essentially, we’re referring to the timing of the opening — essentially, the opening of our country, because we have it pretty well shut down in order to get rid of this invisible enemy." ~ Impeached Trump, 3.23.20​

Where does that prove that Trump shutdown the country?

Trump and admin called all the governor's before Trump made the decision to lockdown.

Who is "Trump and admin?" Trump doesn't have the authority to lock any state down. Only governors and state legislatures can do that.

On the one hand you blame Trump for the lockdown. On the other you attack Trump because he supposedly didn't lock anything down.

This is the kind of shear idiocy Dims are known for.

 

[Skylar]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

He campaigned quite a bit actually. Trump never stopped campaigning so the comparison distorts reality.

I've never EVER seen a Presidential candidate who didn't campaign like Trump did...EXCEPT of course, Joe Biden! In the heat to the campaign when Trump was doing 3 and 4 rallies a day (like all candidates!) Joe Biden would take the whole day off.

1) The campaign was the middle of pandemic. Ask Herman Cain how responsible it was to be holding those events.

2) Trump in large measure defeated himself. The more people saw, the less people wanted. Its one of the reasons that Trump carried so few cities he campaigned in.

Trump carried few cities where the Democrats controlled the local election process. Cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis and Phoenix are where the numbers simply don't add up.

Explain why Phili, Detroit or Minneapolis would have gone to Trump.

Trump never polled well in any of those cities and lost them all in 2016. Why then would him losing cities he was polling poorly in and he had already lost once be evidence of fraud?

Your conspiracy doesn't make the slightest sense.

It's not that he would have won those cities, Skylar...it's that those cities had unprecedented turnout for Joe Biden...especially in ballots that were counted after the polls closed. Trump got more votes than he got in the last election but somehow a candidate that nobody on the Democratic side was excited about turned out more voters than any candidate in American election history? THAT doesn't make sense!

You grossly underestimate how poor a candidate Trump actually is. And how vulnerble he was with the poor economy, massive spike in unemployment, 250,000 COVID dead, and tens of thousands of closed businesses.

There's nothing particularly suspect about Trump losing cities that he lost in 2016. Or where he was polling poorly. Especially in a poorer economy.

Only the lowest kind of douchebag blames Trump for COVID and the shutdown.

Fucking moron.

"At the end of the 15-day period, we’ll make a decision as to which way we want to go, where we want to go, the timing. And essentially, we’re referring to the timing of the opening — essentially, the opening of our country, because we have it pretty well shut down in order to get rid of this invisible enemy." ~ Impeached Trump, 3.23.20​

Where does that prove that Trump shutdown the country?

Trump and admin called all the governor's before Trump made the decision to lockdown.

Who is "Trump and admin?" Trump doesn't have the authority to lock any state down. Only governors and state legislatures can do that.

On the one hand you blame Trump for the lockdown. On the other you attack Trump because he supposedly didn't lock anything down.

This is the kind of shear idiocy Dims are known for.

A moot point. It doesn't matter if Trump locked down the nation or if he didn't.

He was judged on his record. And on November 3rd......our economy was in poor shape. That you don't believe Trump is to blame doesn't matter. As Trump's best pitch would be "Things are awful and I've failed to fix the problem".

Not a great pitch. And certainly not one that would appeal to voters looking for leadership rather than excuses.

 

[Skylar]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

I'm not quoting me, Bri. I'm quoting Bill Barr:

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Now why would I ignore the Attorney General and believe you?

You've never given me a good reason.

Out of context, moron.

Says you, citing you. And you don't know what you're talking about.

Here's the entire article. Put it in context for us:

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

Or....keep fleeing. Either serves my purpose.

What part of "I'm not debating the talking points spewing machine" didn't you understand?

The part where you keep replying every time I refute your argument with evidence.

So much for your 'out of context' nonsense. When even you treat your accusations like meaningless garbage to be thrown on the rhetorical midden heap.....surely you'll understand when we treat your accusations the same way.

I replay only by saying I'm not going to argue about your incessant bullshit talking points.

So much for your 'out of context' nonsense.

Which leaves Barr's decimation of your entire 'stolen election' fantasy uncontested.

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

There's a reason why State after State has certified their election results: your claims just don't hold up.

 

[otto105]

When your opponent is destroying himself, simply get out of the way.

Good job Sleepy Joe!! OP, your guy lost. He's a loser. #DealWithIt

But in the meantime, hold on to these L's...

The election was a swindle. There is a mountain of proof.

LOL

A mountain of proof they can't prove in court.

They haven't gone to court yet, moron.

Its been a month since the election. And Trump's lawyers keep arguing in court that they're not even ALLEGING fraud ever took place.

You've been played like a fiddle.

Do you morons ever come up with new arguments? This one has already been debunked 10,000 times. Repeating DNC talking points is what you do, homo skylar. That's all you do.

Why would we need 'new arguments'....when the old ones work so well?

Your conspiracy is still broken by the election results.

What part of "already debunked" didn't you understand?

The 'debunking' part. You simply ignoring the election results doesn't 'debunk' them.

As demonstrated elegantly by all the States certifying their election tallies.

No, we don't ignore the ballot results. For instance, we didn't ignore that fact that one state recieved more mail-in ballots than it sent out. How the fuck would that happen without massive fraud?

Which State?

Remember, you're really big on accusations. But when pressed to back those claims up.......you fail. Remember when you quoted that 'state official' in Pennsylvania that said there were 700k more mail in ballots received than were requested?

Turns out that 'state official'....was Rudy Gulliani. And he had nothing to back the claim up.

Meanwhile, the DOJ and FBI has investigated specific voter fraud allegations....and found nothing to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Furthermore, none of the states being contested have certified the results. Only the state legislature can certify a federal election. SOS's or election boards can't do it.

Nonsense. Georgia certified. Wisconsin certified. Pennsylvania certified. Michigan certified. Arizona certified. Nevada certified

Remember, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're aggressively ignorant.

It tends to hamper your arguments.

I have no intention in debating you, Skylar, because you are a witless baboon who repeats the same already-debunked talking points over and over and over.

Or....because I've researched the topics we're discussing, citing election results, the relevant court cases (and their outcomes), as well as the the DOJ and FBI investigations into the matter.

While you've just repeated whatever 'Pennsylvania State Official' Rudy Gulliani tells you to think. Without researching anything.

Or sources are not equal.

All you've done is read DNC talking points. You repeat the same stuff that turds like you have been posting in this forum for weeks.

Or....I've read the actual election results. As well as the court cases where Trump has lost over and over. As well as the results of the DOJ and FBI investigations into the matter.

All you've read is fraud, moron. The bottom line is that this election isn't going to be decided until the legal process has fully played out and the state legislatures have voted to certify the result.

Its over loser.

 

[bripat9643]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

He campaigned quite a bit actually. Trump never stopped campaigning so the comparison distorts reality.

I've never EVER seen a Presidential candidate who didn't campaign like Trump did...EXCEPT of course, Joe Biden! In the heat to the campaign when Trump was doing 3 and 4 rallies a day (like all candidates!) Joe Biden would take the whole day off.

1) The campaign was the middle of pandemic. Ask Herman Cain how responsible it was to be holding those events.

2) Trump in large measure defeated himself. The more people saw, the less people wanted. Its one of the reasons that Trump carried so few cities he campaigned in.

Trump carried few cities where the Democrats controlled the local election process. Cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis and Phoenix are where the numbers simply don't add up.

Explain why Phili, Detroit or Minneapolis would have gone to Trump.

Trump never polled well in any of those cities and lost them all in 2016. Why then would him losing cities he was polling poorly in and he had already lost once be evidence of fraud?

Your conspiracy doesn't make the slightest sense.

It's not that he would have won those cities, Skylar...it's that those cities had unprecedented turnout for Joe Biden...especially in ballots that were counted after the polls closed. Trump got more votes than he got in the last election but somehow a candidate that nobody on the Democratic side was excited about turned out more voters than any candidate in American election history? THAT doesn't make sense!

You grossly underestimate how poor a candidate Trump actually is. And how vulnerble he was with the poor economy, massive spike in unemployment, 250,000 COVID dead, and tens of thousands of closed businesses.

There's nothing particularly suspect about Trump losing cities that he lost in 2016. Or where he was polling poorly. Especially in a poorer economy.

Only the lowest kind of douchebag blames Trump for COVID and the shutdown.

Fucking moron.

"At the end of the 15-day period, we’ll make a decision as to which way we want to go, where we want to go, the timing. And essentially, we’re referring to the timing of the opening — essentially, the opening of our country, because we have it pretty well shut down in order to get rid of this invisible enemy." ~ Impeached Trump, 3.23.20​

Where does that prove that Trump shutdown the country?

Trump and admin called all the governor's before Trump made the decision to lockdown.

Who is "Trump and admin?" Trump doesn't have the authority to lock any state down. Only governors and state legislatures can do that.

On the one hand you blame Trump for the lockdown. On the other you attack Trump because he supposedly didn't lock anything down.

This is the kind of shear idiocy Dims are known for.

A moot point. It doesn't matter if Trump locked down the nation or if he didn't.

He was judged on his record. And on November 3rd......our economy was in poor shape. That you don't believe Trump is to blame doesn't matter. As Trump's best pitch would be "Things are awful and I've failed to fix the problem".

Not a great pitch. And certainly not one that would appeal to voters looking for leadership rather than excuses.

Yada, Yada, Yada. does anything you post mean anything other than that you're an idiot who can repeat a talking point?

 

[bripat9643]

When your opponent is destroying himself, simply get out of the way.

Good job Sleepy Joe!! OP, your guy lost. He's a loser. #DealWithIt

But in the meantime, hold on to these L's...

The election was a swindle. There is a mountain of proof.

LOL

A mountain of proof they can't prove in court.

They haven't gone to court yet, moron.

Its been a month since the election. And Trump's lawyers keep arguing in court that they're not even ALLEGING fraud ever took place.

You've been played like a fiddle.

Do you morons ever come up with new arguments? This one has already been debunked 10,000 times. Repeating DNC talking points is what you do, homo skylar. That's all you do.

Why would we need 'new arguments'....when the old ones work so well?

Your conspiracy is still broken by the election results.

What part of "already debunked" didn't you understand?

The 'debunking' part. You simply ignoring the election results doesn't 'debunk' them.

As demonstrated elegantly by all the States certifying their election tallies.

No, we don't ignore the ballot results. For instance, we didn't ignore that fact that one state recieved more mail-in ballots than it sent out. How the fuck would that happen without massive fraud?

Which State?

Remember, you're really big on accusations. But when pressed to back those claims up.......you fail. Remember when you quoted that 'state official' in Pennsylvania that said there were 700k more mail in ballots received than were requested?

Turns out that 'state official'....was Rudy Gulliani. And he had nothing to back the claim up.

Meanwhile, the DOJ and FBI has investigated specific voter fraud allegations....and found nothing to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Furthermore, none of the states being contested have certified the results. Only the state legislature can certify a federal election. SOS's or election boards can't do it.

Nonsense. Georgia certified. Wisconsin certified. Pennsylvania certified. Michigan certified. Arizona certified. Nevada certified

Remember, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're aggressively ignorant.

It tends to hamper your arguments.

I have no intention in debating you, Skylar, because you are a witless baboon who repeats the same already-debunked talking points over and over and over.

Or....because I've researched the topics we're discussing, citing election results, the relevant court cases (and their outcomes), as well as the the DOJ and FBI investigations into the matter.

While you've just repeated whatever 'Pennsylvania State Official' Rudy Gulliani tells you to think. Without researching anything.

Or sources are not equal.

All you've done is read DNC talking points. You repeat the same stuff that turds like you have been posting in this forum for weeks.

Or....I've read the actual election results. As well as the court cases where Trump has lost over and over. As well as the results of the DOJ and FBI investigations into the matter.

All you've read is fraud, moron. The bottom line is that this election isn't going to be decided until the legal process has fully played out and the state legislatures have voted to certify the result.

Its over loser.

NOT.

 

[Faun]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

Who didn't know?

View attachment 424652

And the results, a month after the election when 99% of the votes are counted?

Biden 51.3%
Trump 46.9%

If you keep counting the same votes over and over without determining whether some of them are fraudulent than what have you proven?

Fraudlent....according to who? Remember, there's simply no evidence found to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Says who? Says the Attorney General :

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The election results are superb evidence. You'll need better evidence that to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

And as Barr made ridiculously clear.....there isn't any.

There's tons of evidence, moron. You keep saying "no evidence" even though evidence is reported every day.

Barr says he hasn't found any widespread fraud yet that could change the outcome of the election. Why on Earth would anyone in their right mind believe a fucking moron like you over Barr??

Barr hasn't looked yet, moron.

He told the AP it's being investigated...

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received...​

So are you lying again or are you just a fucking moron?

 

[Skylar]

When your opponent is destroying himself, simply get out of the way.

Good job Sleepy Joe!! OP, your guy lost. He's a loser. #DealWithIt

But in the meantime, hold on to these L's...

The election was a swindle. There is a mountain of proof.

LOL

A mountain of proof they can't prove in court.

They haven't gone to court yet, moron.

Its been a month since the election. And Trump's lawyers keep arguing in court that they're not even ALLEGING fraud ever took place.

You've been played like a fiddle.

Do you morons ever come up with new arguments? This one has already been debunked 10,000 times. Repeating DNC talking points is what you do, homo skylar. That's all you do.

Why would we need 'new arguments'....when the old ones work so well?

Your conspiracy is still broken by the election results.

What part of "already debunked" didn't you understand?

The 'debunking' part. You simply ignoring the election results doesn't 'debunk' them.

As demonstrated elegantly by all the States certifying their election tallies.

No, we don't ignore the ballot results. For instance, we didn't ignore that fact that one state recieved more mail-in ballots than it sent out. How the fuck would that happen without massive fraud?

Which State?

Remember, you're really big on accusations. But when pressed to back those claims up.......you fail. Remember when you quoted that 'state official' in Pennsylvania that said there were 700k more mail in ballots received than were requested?

Turns out that 'state official'....was Rudy Gulliani. And he had nothing to back the claim up.

Meanwhile, the DOJ and FBI has investigated specific voter fraud allegations....and found nothing to back the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

Furthermore, none of the states being contested have certified the results. Only the state legislature can certify a federal election. SOS's or election boards can't do it.

Nonsense. Georgia certified. Wisconsin certified. Pennsylvania certified. Michigan certified. Arizona certified. Nevada certified

Remember, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're aggressively ignorant.

It tends to hamper your arguments.

I have no intention in debating you, Skylar, because you are a witless baboon who repeats the same already-debunked talking points over and over and over.

Or....because I've researched the topics we're discussing, citing election results, the relevant court cases (and their outcomes), as well as the the DOJ and FBI investigations into the matter.

While you've just repeated whatever 'Pennsylvania State Official' Rudy Gulliani tells you to think. Without researching anything.

Or sources are not equal.

All you've done is read DNC talking points. You repeat the same stuff that turds like you have been posting in this forum for weeks.

Or....I've read the actual election results. As well as the court cases where Trump has lost over and over. As well as the results of the DOJ and FBI investigations into the matter.

All you've read is fraud, moron. The bottom line is that this election isn't going to be decided until the legal process has fully played out and the state legislatures have voted to certify the result.

Its over loser.

NOT.

Again, most States have created their own Election Commissions to certify the State election results. Your insistence that the State legislatures themselves have to certify again....is just made up nonsense.

As demonstrated by State after State certifying their results without the State legislatures voting on the matter directly.

Georgia certified. Wisconsin certified. Pennsylvania certified. Michigan certified. Arizona certified. Nevada certified

Remember.....you don't have the slightest clue how any of this works.

 

[JimBowie1958]

 

[Faun]

not just because hes a disaster with dementia, but Like President Trump said today, Biden knew he would "win".

He campaigned quite a bit actually. Trump never stopped campaigning so the comparison distorts reality.

I've never EVER seen a Presidential candidate who didn't campaign like Trump did...EXCEPT of course, Joe Biden! In the heat to the campaign when Trump was doing 3 and 4 rallies a day (like all candidates!) Joe Biden would take the whole day off.

1) The campaign was the middle of pandemic. Ask Herman Cain how responsible it was to be holding those events.

2) Trump in large measure defeated himself. The more people saw, the less people wanted. Its one of the reasons that Trump carried so few cities he campaigned in.

Trump carried few cities where the Democrats controlled the local election process. Cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis and Phoenix are where the numbers simply don't add up.

Explain why Phili, Detroit or Minneapolis would have gone to Trump.

Trump never polled well in any of those cities and lost them all in 2016. Why then would him losing cities he was polling poorly in and he had already lost once be evidence of fraud?

Your conspiracy doesn't make the slightest sense.

It's not that he would have won those cities, Skylar...it's that those cities had unprecedented turnout for Joe Biden...especially in ballots that were counted after the polls closed. Trump got more votes than he got in the last election but somehow a candidate that nobody on the Democratic side was excited about turned out more voters than any candidate in American election history? THAT doesn't make sense!

You grossly underestimate how poor a candidate Trump actually is. And how vulnerble he was with the poor economy, massive spike in unemployment, 250,000 COVID dead, and tens of thousands of closed businesses.

There's nothing particularly suspect about Trump losing cities that he lost in 2016. Or where he was polling poorly. Especially in a poorer economy.

Only the lowest kind of douchebag blames Trump for COVID and the shutdown.

Fucking moron.

"At the end of the 15-day period, we’ll make a decision as to which way we want to go, where we want to go, the timing. And essentially, we’re referring to the timing of the opening — essentially, the opening of our country, because we have it pretty well shut down in order to get rid of this invisible enemy." ~ Impeached Trump, 3.23.20​

Where does that prove that Trump shutdown the country?

Fucking moron, Impeached Trump called for the shutdown and governors acquiesced. Then he called for an extension to the shut down...

Trump calls for shutdown until April 30

President Donald Trump is extending the voluntary national shutdown for a month as sickness and death from the coronavirus pandemic rise in the U.S.

www.modernhealthcare.com

 

[Skylar]

And what does that have to do with Biden's 23 campaign events in 21 days over 10 states?

Or did you just want to feel like you were part of the conversation?