Biden Administration’s Decision Not to Charge Former Trump Aides

[Sunsettommy]

Epoch Times

Leaders of House’s Jan. 6 Panel Decry Biden Administration’s Decision Not to Charge Former Trump Aides​

By Zachary Stieber

June 4, 2022

Excerpt:

Leaders of the House of Representatives’ panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol on June 3 decried the Department of Justice’s reported decision not to indict Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino, two former aides of ex-President Donald Trump.

At the same time, the panel praised the department’s indictment of Peter Navarro, another former aide.

“While today’s indictment of Peter Navarro was the correct decision by the Justice Department, we find the decision to reward Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino for their continued attack on the rule of law puzzling,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), chairman of the panel, and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), chairwoman of the panel, said in a joint statement.

LINK

=====

Navarro will eventually be free too since the J6 Committee is illegal according to house rules.

 

[pknopp]

Quid Pro Quo for no one charging Hillary.

 

[White 6]

Quid Pro Quo for no one charging Hillary.

Well, at least I hope it is more than that.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

there was not an insurrection
this is just another Dirty Democrat smear campaign

 

[okfine]

Epoch Times

Leaders of House’s Jan. 6 Panel Decry Biden Administration’s Decision Not to Charge Former Trump Aides​

By Zachary Stieber

June 4, 2022

Excerpt:

Leaders of the House of Representatives’ panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol on June 3 decried the Department of Justice’s reported decision not to indict Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino, two former aides of ex-President Donald Trump.

At the same time, the panel praised the department’s indictment of Peter Navarro, another former aide.

“While today’s indictment of Peter Navarro was the correct decision by the Justice Department, we find the decision to reward Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino for their continued attack on the rule of law puzzling,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), chairman of the panel, and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), chairwoman of the panel, said in a joint statement.

LINK

=====

Navarro will eventually be free too since the J6 Committee is illegal according to house rules.

Are those two rats?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

When the Reps win the house there should be an investigation into Pelosi's two false impeachments of Trump.

 

[Donald H]

Well, at least I hope it is more than that.

What it is White, is America's government authorities being cautiious to not bite off more than they can chew.

It's hard to admit that the threat of fascism has intimidated your country into inaction.

Even if the military stayed loyal to government, the bloodshed would be beyond what could be considered acceptable.

Not to even mention that some government leaders would be apprehended and lynched.

The fork in the road between democracy and fascism isn't far ahead. America must act soon to stop the progress.

 

[easyt65]

Epoch Times

Leaders of House’s Jan. 6 Panel Decry Biden Administration’s Decision Not to Charge Former Trump Aides​

By Zachary Stieber

June 4, 2022

Excerpt:

Leaders of the House of Representatives’ panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol on June 3 decried the Department of Justice’s reported decision not to indict Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino, two former aides of ex-President Donald Trump.

At the same time, the panel praised the department’s indictment of Peter Navarro, another former aide.

“While today’s indictment of Peter Navarro was the correct decision by the Justice Department, we find the decision to reward Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino for their continued attack on the rule of law puzzling,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), chairman of the panel, and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), chairwoman of the panel, said in a joint statement.

LINK

=====

Navarro will eventually be free too since the J6 Committee is illegal according to house rules.

"Truuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmp!"

Their reaction only shows the real purpose of their '6 Jan Hearings.

Pelosi hasn't gotten over her 2 failed criminal Impeachment coup attempts and wants a 3rd shot at taking him and his aides down.

Americans aren't stupid - they see it. It's just more fuel for the fire, the Nov Democrat ass-kicking.

 

[White 6]

What it is White, is America's government authorities being cautiious to not bite off more than they can chew.

It's hard to admit that the threat of fascism has intimidated your country into inaction.

Even if the military stayed loyal to government, the bloodshed would be beyond what could be considered acceptable.

Not to even mention that some government leaders would be apprehended and lynched.

The fork in the road between democracy and fascism isn't far ahead. America must act soon to stop the progress.

Not scared to inaction, but they definitely only choose to prosecute "slam dunk" cases in the politically charged events, which can be view as good or bad, depending on the viewer.
This last action on Jan 6, was just a dry run, to evaluate reaction, though follow-on dumbasses didn't know it. Reaction on site, will undoubtedly be far worse and messier if there is a next time. Nobody will be apprehended and lynched, unless the focus is broad based, instead of point attack. It got government's attention. Government is paying attention to what harmless? idiots are posting. The organizers will not be freely coordinating by cell phone, as if they were Russian troops in Ukraine, as it is not working there either. Oh, and the military will without the shadow of a doubt, remain loyal to the Constitution and their oaths.

 

[B. Kidd]

The Stalinist 1/6 Committee forgot that Navarro can invoke 'executive privilege'!

If he can't, just add another Constitutional infringement on the Neo-Marxist Dimm's!! While these anti-American reprobates continue to argue that our Constitution is non-absolute in their perpetual power grab to turn us into something that no longer resembles America.

 

[pknopp]

The Stalinist 1/6 Committee forgot that Navarro can invoke 'executive privilege'!

If he can't, just add another Constitutional infringement on the Neo-Marxist Dimm's!! While these anti-American reprobates continue to argue that our Constitution is non-absolute in their perpetual power grab to turn us into something that no longer resembles America.

Executive privilege is a qualified privelege not an absolute privelege. The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that Nixon had to turn over his tapes when he claimed it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Epoch Times

Leaders of House’s Jan. 6 Panel Decry Biden Administration’s Decision Not to Charge Former Trump Aides​

By Zachary Stieber

June 4, 2022

Excerpt:

Leaders of the House of Representatives’ panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol on June 3 decried the Department of Justice’s reported decision not to indict Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino, two former aides of ex-President Donald Trump.

At the same time, the panel praised the department’s indictment of Peter Navarro, another former aide.

“While today’s indictment of Peter Navarro was the correct decision by the Justice Department, we find the decision to reward Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino for their continued attack on the rule of law puzzling,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), chairman of the panel, and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), chairwoman of the panel, said in a joint statement.

LINK

=====

Navarro will eventually be free too since the J6 Committee is illegal according to house rules.

It isn't illegal. That's why it's not going anywhere. Your fantasies have no bearing on that.

Merrick Garland didn't charge them, became they are still negotiating in good faith with the committee.

That wasn't true of Navarro. So now he faces jail time.

 

[1srelluc]

Meh, just run out the clock till January of '25 and it all goes away.....Along with several members of the bogus committee.

 

[meaner gene]

The Stalinist 1/6 Committee forgot that Navarro can invoke 'executive privilege'!

If he can't, just add another Constitutional infringement on the Neo-Marxist Dimm's!! While these anti-American reprobates continue to argue that our Constitution is non-absolute in their perpetual power grab to turn us into something that no longer resembles America.

The problem with that, is there is the "crime fraud" exception to the privilege.
To put it simply, when Nixon discussed how to handle the watergate burglars with his aides, that conversation wasn't covered due to the "crime fraud" exception.

Planning an insurrection for which people have already been convicted as co-conspirators, is certain a "crime"

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Meh, just run out the clock till January of '25 and it all goes away.....Along with several members of the bogus committee.

They can't do that, sorry. They will try, but there is an expiration date on their little shell game.

 

[struth]

The problem with that, is there is the "crime fraud" exception to the privilege.
To put it simply, when Nixon discussed how to handle the watergate burglars with his aides, that conversation wasn't covered due to the "crime fraud" exception.

Planning an insurrection for which people have already been convicted as co-conspirators, is certain a "crime"

haha there was no crime…there was no planning of an “insurrection”

trumps been investigated five ways to sunday…just stop already

 

[B. Kidd]

It isn't illegal. That's why it's not going anywhere. Your fantasies have no bearing on that.

Merrick Garland didn't charge them, became they are still negotiating in good faith with the committee.

That wasn't true of Navarro. So now he faces jail time.

You really need to hand in your citizenship and move to Venezuela.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

haha there was no crime…there was no planning of an “insurrection”

trumps been investigated five ways to sunday…just stop already

No, this is actually the first investigation into his circle and his insurrection.

And it is revealing that they had a plan to overthrow the election, and Trump was on on it every step of the way.

Eventually, you are just going to have to admit you supported the insurrection.

 

[B. Kidd]

The problem with that, is there is the "crime fraud" exception to the privilege.
To put it simply, when Nixon discussed how to handle the watergate burglars with his aides, that conversation wasn't covered due to the "crime fraud" exception.

Planning an insurrection for which people have already been convicted as co-conspirators, is certain a "crime"

The fly in your soup is that there was no real insurrection!!
Progtard!!!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The fly in your soup is that there was no real insurrection!!
Progtard!!!

Sorry, cultist. "Nuh uh, no I didn't!" is not a good defense against 1000s of hours of video and mountains of documents.