Zone1 Biden Administration Awards $7 Billion for 7 Hydrogen Hubs Across the U.S. : would certainly solve the refueling problem.

[elektra]

every new branch of science turned to production technology has it's failures.

This is not a new branch of science. You have zero understanding of what you are talking about.

 

[elektra]

This is just another dumbass Environmental Wacko project that cost billions of dollars at a time when we are $34 trillion in debt. President Potatohead is an idiot and anybody .

I wonder what Democrat donors are getting rich on this scam?

You are wrong, this will be part of the $160 trillions of dollars Democrats have started to spend on the Green Economy.

Democrats are the super rich.

 

[peacefan]

What do ostriches have to do with an article about a green failure?

because opposition to the need to prepare for man-made climate change today, is sticking your head in the distant past like an ostrich burries his/her head in the sand.

 

[elektra]

because opposition to the need to prepare for man-made climate change today, is sticking your head in the distant past like an ostrich burries his/her head in the sand.

irony
peacefan does not realize it is his/her head in the sand

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

because opposition to the need to prepare for man-made climate change today, is sticking your head in the distant past like an ostrich burries his/her head in the sand.

I'm all in favor of reliable energy, like nuclear.
Wind and solar are, for the most part, an enormous waste of time and money.
Hydrogen fuel for cars, unless it's from a huge increase of nuclear power, is a
waste of money and energy.

No birds involved.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

irony
peacefan does not realize it is his/her head in the sand

His bird brain needs much less oxygen.

 

[justoffal]

Biden Administration Awards $7 Billion for 7 Hydrogen Hubs Across the U.S.
Clean hydrogen could help fight climate change, but it barely exists today. Now the administration wants to build an entire industry from scratch.

Remote : Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:03:22 +0000
Local : 2023-10-13(Friday) 11 : 03 : 22
Found via NicerApp WebOS

i support this.
even though it's gonna cost a lot of money, it's a vital example to the rest of the world.

It's also extremely inefficient. Electrolysis is very energy consumptive. Gonna need two coal fired power plants to make the. Hydrogen for one hub.

 

[justoffal]

I'm all in favor of reliable energy, like nuclear.
Wind and solar are, for the most part, an enormous waste of time and money.
Hydrogen fuel for cars, unless it's from a huge increase of nuclear power, is a
waste of money and energy.

No birds involved.

They'll be fine as long as they build a few coal fired power plants for each hub

 

[elektra]

MSN

www.msn.com

Shell Is Immediately Closing All Of Its California Hydrogen Stations​

Few companies can make a better case for it than Shell, though, as the cheapest way to produce hydrogen involves a lot of natural gas. Its proximity to the fossil-fuel industry was supposed to make it cheaper, and provide incentive for robust fueling infrastructure. That hasn't played out, though, and one of the largest oil giants is throwing in the towel. If even a fossil giant like Shell can't justify investing in the future of light-duty hydrogen infrastructure, we're not sure who can.

 

[Resnic]

If you think all 7 billion is going to go into the hubs then you're living in the same dream world where you also say it will help fight climate change and believe climate change is man made.

And what's the time frame to get them all built? 10, 25, 20 years?

This is all a pipe dream that won't happen in the end.

 

[IM2]

Please let me know when our government has been accurate or remotely accurate when trying to
to push a spending agenda, okay?
I can't even remember one time where they had overestimated the cost, can you?

Spare us. We face extinction or we change. There is no price on that.

 

[elektra]

Spare us. We face extinction or we change. There is no price on that.

Thus far, the change to save us, is destroying us.

Solar and wind destroy the earth, 100's of square mile at a time. Cutting down trees, destroying farm land. We destroy the ocean and literally change the environment.

We built a new, huge heavy industry, a chemical industry, to build solar and wind.

Everything built has been short lived, lasting a fraction of the time out tradional power plants last.

You are crying that we are destroying ourselves while advocating for greater destruction.

 

[Meister]

Spare us. We face extinction or we change. There is no price on that.

You make me laugh with a stupid comment like that.

 

[IM2]

You make me laugh with a stupid comment like that.
Idiot

The problem with your comment is that I am right.

 

[Meister]

The problem with your comment is that I am right.

In your mind, I am sure YOU think YOU are right.
But, that don't make it right, IM2, now run along

 

[elektra]

The problem with your comment is that I am right.

yep, you are right, and we all must believe on faith, nothing more, no evidence, nothing,