Bernie will rightly break-up the "too big to fail" Banks. Hillary won't

[Kosh]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

The recession was caused by the government forcing banks to make bad loans.

Now, again, under what authority will Sanders breakup those banks and what will happen if he succeeds?

Now do not show facts to these far left drones, I do not know if this board could handle a Dottie meltdown!

 

[Lakhota]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

You seem to have thrown all logic out the window over your Bernie mania. You used to make sense.

 

[Dot Com]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

The recession was caused by the government forcing banks to make bad loans.

Now, again, under what authority will Sanders breakup those banks and what will happen if he succeeds?

did the gov't force them to bundle junk together w/ some acceptable loans and sell them to large institutional investors? The banks exacerbated it due to greed and thats who Hillary is being paid by

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover,

Why do you think that?
Economically, what is the difference between 10 banks losing $20 billion each vs 2 banks losing $100 billion each?

 

[Dot Com]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

You seem to have thrown all logic out the window over your Bernie mania. You used to make sense.

because I disagree w/ Establ drones?

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

The recession was caused by the government forcing banks to make bad loans.

Now, again, under what authority will Sanders breakup those banks and what will happen if he succeeds?

did the gov't force them to bundle junk together w/ some acceptable loans and sell them to large institutional investors? They exacerbated it

Bundling the loans didn't cause the government created bubble to burst.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover,

Why do you think that?
Economically, what is the difference between 10 banks losing $20 billion each vs 2 banks losing $100 billion each?

The Libbos won't admit it, but they want to implement the communist manifesto and create one central bank, operated by the government.

 

[Tom Horn]

"too big to fail" isn't just somebody talking. The banks aren't about to get broken up by some old socialist who doesn't understand, and thus hates, free enterprise. Go after the banks and the banks could close their doors and tell you to get bent when you want to write a check or use the teller machine...then what? Are you ready for a worse depression than we had in the 1930's when the banks gave the country the finger? All you have to do to co-exist with the banks is keep commercial and investment banking separate and make sure they follow the laws concerning fair lending, and solvency.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

You seem to have thrown all logic out the window over your Bernie mania. You used to make sense.

lakota...me and you have disagreed many times here,but believe me when i tell you,dottie will vote for clinton without hesitation if she gets the nod....he isnt fooling anyone.....and i bet you agree with me on this....

 

[Lakhota]

This right here is why Bernie is a far better choice then Hillary.

Funny. This campaign is about much more than big banks.

Barring a Catastrophe, Hillary Clinton’s Nomination Is Inevitable Again

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This right here is why Bernie is a far better choice then Hillary.

Funny. This campaign is about much more than big banks.

Barring a Catastrophe, Hillary Clinton’s Nomination Is Inevitable Again

Hillary is a Catastrophe, and kinda unhealthy. She could keel over at anytime.

 

[2aguy]

Notice how Hillary is basically parroting everything Sanders says EXCEPT for the elephant in the room behind the corrupt campaign finace system. Bernie's donations are small. Hillarry's, OTOH come from the current owners of the gov't AND NO, I'm not referring to the citizens in this case:

Top Donors data for Hillary Clinton, 2016 Cycle | OpenSecrets

So who is she going to work for if elected? You?

Bernoe will get up everyday and work for the people who are NOT well-connected like Bill & Hillary and their Big $$$ donors

Don't look at her donor list if you get squeamish easy

yes...under sanders everything in this country will fail.......and we will run out of toilet paper just like Venezuela......the wonders of socialism...

 

[Ravi]

If my bank fails I'm screwed. Where is Bernie's plan for that?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If my bank fails I'm screwed. Where is Bernie's plan for that?

You have a bank? Bernie thinks you're part of the problem.

 

[Ravi]

If my bank fails I'm screwed. Where is Bernie's plan for that?

You have a bank? Bernie thinks you're part of the problem.

No, I have my money in a bank.

 

[georgephillip]

If my bank fails I'm screwed. Where is Bernie's plan for that?

You have a bank? Bernie thinks you're part of the problem.

Your part of the problem?

 

[jillian]

If my bank fails I'm screwed. Where is Bernie's plan for that?

You have a bank? Bernie thinks you're part of the problem.

it's really impossible to take seriously someone who makes misrepresenations like that.

 

[Dot Com]

Under what authority will Sanders breakup banks and what is supposed to happen if he succeeds In breaking them up?

Their losses will be less catastrophic to this great nation's economy/more easier to manage when they eventually bet more than they can cover, which they always do. Can't believe I had to tell you that after the Wall St orgy of greed in 2008

The recession was caused by the government forcing banks to make bad loans.

Now, again, under what authority will Sanders breakup those banks and what will happen if he succeeds?

did the gov't force them to bundle junk together w/ some acceptable loans and sell them to large institutional investors? They exacerbated it

Bundling the loans didn't cause the government created bubble to burst.

ummm..... they were bunding bad loans inside of good ones you hack. Thats why they all got sued. Goldman recently paid out $5 BILLION for misrepresentation. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/15/b...o-settle-claims-of-faulty-mortgages.html?_r=0

Bank of America paid out even more. They got off way easy IMO

Why are you in this thread again?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If my bank fails I'm screwed. Where is Bernie's plan for that?

You have a bank? Bernie thinks you're part of the problem.

it's really impossible to take seriously someone who makes misrepresenations like that.

Oh, come one.
You have to admit that was funny, eh comrade?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If my bank fails I'm screwed. Where is Bernie's plan for that?

You have a bank? Bernie thinks you're part of the problem.

No, I have my money in a bank.

You have money? Bernie thinks you're part of the problem.