Bernie Sanders urges superdelegates to abandon Hillary Rodham Clinton

[paulitician]

Hey, now Bernie's showing some heart. He seemed to be flatlining for so long. He hasn't been reflecting the energy his supporters have shown. He's gotta show much more Chutzpah if he expects to beat Clinton.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Goldman Sachs paid good money for those SuperDelegates. What can Bernie offer them?

OVEY!

It's "oy Vay"......Sheesh...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Dems 1961: Ask not what your country can do for you...

Dems 2016: Free Shit! Don't even bother asking!!

 

[thereisnospoon]

I must ask....And I will not renderan opinion on your response as it is everyone's right to express their views on a particular candidate....Why are you supporting Sanders?
Just be honest and give your reasons.
I am truly interested in the reasons for your choice.
Again, I will not give a you a response. I am looking for your reasons and leave it at that...

 

[thereisnospoon]

It is about time he did that, but it will not work. The Democratic elite want HilIary as much as the Republican elite do not want Trump. Seems both parties have their own agenda and it has nothing to do with what the people want.

What DO the people want?

 

[paulitician]

Dems 1961: Ask not what your country can do for you...

Dems 2016: Free Shit! Don't even bother asking!!

Spot On. Nuff said.

 

[TheOldSchool]

When they created them, yes.

However, the Super delegates since they were created have always moved towards the candidate with the most popular votes..... 2008 was harder than all other years because Obama and Hillary were in a virtual tie nearly the entire primary...

Then please explain how hiLIARy wins the Super Delegates in states where Bernie won the popular vote?

She hasn't WON any of the super delegate's votes, the super delegates do not vote until the convention and change their minds right up to that point....

Hillary had super delegates on her side in 2008 all up until the convention, and then at the convention they switched and voted for Obama...

Then please explain why the Superdelegate votes have already been added to her totals?

Only your rube sources have added them to her figures.

Like your New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html

Do you see where it says they can vote for Sanders if he does better than expected? Meaning she has not won any super delegates?

 

[boedicca]

Then please explain how hiLIARy wins the Super Delegates in states where Bernie won the popular vote?

She hasn't WON any of the super delegate's votes, the super delegates do not vote until the convention and change their minds right up to that point....

Hillary had super delegates on her side in 2008 all up until the convention, and then at the convention they switched and voted for Obama...

Then please explain why the Superdelegate votes have already been added to her totals?

Only your rube sources have added them to her figures.

Like your New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html

Do you see where it says they can vote for Sanders if he does better than expected? Meaning she has not won any super delegates?

Do you see where the Party Establishment has declared support for hiLIARy in order to have here declared the front runner by the Main Stream Proganda Organ?

 

[TheOldSchool]

She hasn't WON any of the super delegate's votes, the super delegates do not vote until the convention and change their minds right up to that point....

Hillary had super delegates on her side in 2008 all up until the convention, and then at the convention they switched and voted for Obama...

Then please explain why the Superdelegate votes have already been added to her totals?

Only your rube sources have added them to her figures.

Like your New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html

Do you see where it says they can vote for Sanders if he does better than expected? Meaning she has not won any super delegates?

Do you see where the Party Establishment has declared support for hiLIARy in order to have here declared the front runner by the Main Stream Proganda Organ?

You're talking out of your ass again. I recommend less Rush Limbaugh and more attempts at rational thought.

 

[boedicca]

Then please explain why the Superdelegate votes have already been added to her totals?

Only your rube sources have added them to her figures.

Like your New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html

Do you see where it says they can vote for Sanders if he does better than expected? Meaning she has not won any super delegates?

Do you see where the Party Establishment has declared support for hiLIARy in order to have here declared the front runner by the Main Stream Proganda Organ?

You're talking out of your ass again. I recommend less Rush Limbaugh and more attempts at rational thought.

It's hardly a surprise that simple MATH is something that dumbfounds you.

And who knew that Rush Limbaugh runs the New York Times?

 

[Lakhota]

Superdelegates would be foolish to switch from Bernie to Hillary. Regardless of what any poll says - he CANNOT win the General Election. America ain't ready for a senile old socialist who recently switched from Independent to Democrat.

 

[2aguy]

FEEL THE BERN, *****!

Bernie Sanders urges superdelegates to abandon Hillary Clinton

He is learning about socialism.....he wins a state, hilary gets the delegates....welcome to socialism bernie......

 

[TheOldSchool]

Only your rube sources have added them to her figures.

Like your New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html

Do you see where it says they can vote for Sanders if he does better than expected? Meaning she has not won any super delegates?

Do you see where the Party Establishment has declared support for hiLIARy in order to have here declared the front runner by the Main Stream Proganda Organ?

You're talking out of your ass again. I recommend less Rush Limbaugh and more attempts at rational thought.

It's hardly a surprise that simple MATH is something that dumbfounds you.

And who knew that Rush Limbaugh runs the New York Times?

Rush Limbaugh innacurately says "Hillary has won all the super delegates! She stole them!" and you slob all over his knob

New York Times correctly says "more super delegates support Hillary, but will change if Sanders gets the votes." Because, of course, historically Democrat super delegates have gone to whoever gets the most votes. This isn't knew.

Enjoy your brokered convention and the eventual Romney nomination boedicca. I guarantee you Democrats will be running the candidate that got the most votes.

 

[boedicca]

Like your New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html

Do you see where it says they can vote for Sanders if he does better than expected? Meaning she has not won any super delegates?

Do you see where the Party Establishment has declared support for hiLIARy in order to have here declared the front runner by the Main Stream Proganda Organ?

You're talking out of your ass again. I recommend less Rush Limbaugh and more attempts at rational thought.

It's hardly a surprise that simple MATH is something that dumbfounds you.

And who knew that Rush Limbaugh runs the New York Times?

Rush Limbaugh innacurately says "Hillary has won all the super delegates! She stole them!" and you slob all over his knob

New York Times correctly says "more super delegates support Hillary, but will change if Sanders gets the votes." Because, of course, historically Democrat super delegates have gone to whoever gets the most votes. This isn't knew.

Enjoy your brokered convention and the eventual Romney nomination boedicca. I guarantee you Democrats will be running the candidate that got the most votes.

I don't listen to Rush, but it's clear that you hang onto his every word.

Just sayin'.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Do you see where it says they can vote for Sanders if he does better than expected? Meaning she has not won any super delegates?

Do you see where the Party Establishment has declared support for hiLIARy in order to have here declared the front runner by the Main Stream Proganda Organ?

You're talking out of your ass again. I recommend less Rush Limbaugh and more attempts at rational thought.

It's hardly a surprise that simple MATH is something that dumbfounds you.

And who knew that Rush Limbaugh runs the New York Times?

Rush Limbaugh innacurately says "Hillary has won all the super delegates! She stole them!" and you slob all over his knob

New York Times correctly says "more super delegates support Hillary, but will change if Sanders gets the votes." Because, of course, historically Democrat super delegates have gone to whoever gets the most votes. This isn't knew.

Enjoy your brokered convention and the eventual Romney nomination boedicca. I guarantee you Democrats will be running the candidate that got the most votes.

I don't listen to Rush, but it's clear that you hang onto his every word.

Just sayin'.

Thank you for ending your argument.

 

[thereisnospoon]

It is about time he did that, but it will not work. The Democratic elite want HilIary as much as the Republican elite do not want Trump. Seems both parties have their own agenda and it has nothing to do with what the people want.

you can't say that yet.... unlike Mr.Trump, Mr Sanders has not garnered more votes from the voters than Hillary....like Mr. Trump has.....on the RNC side....

Assuming you are referring to the total vote added up from each primary/caucus, there is an important item....The total amount of votes over the course of the primary/caucus is immaterial. The delegates are apportioned based on the results in each respective state.
The vote total is NOT considered.

 

[Care4all]

I must ask....And I will not renderan opinion on your response as it is everyone's right to express their views on a particular candidate....Why are you supporting Sanders?
Just be honest and give your reasons.
I am truly interested in the reasons for your choice.
Again, I will not give a you a response. I am looking for your reasons and leave it at that...

He supports Trump, he, like the other conservatives bitching about the democratic primaries and super delegates are simply trying to pit Dems against each other....
Guess the excitement and chaos within the RNC is not enough excitement for us....?

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

They will not listen............

They will; but money speaks. And Soros is paying for HIllary.

 

[thereisnospoon]

It is about time he did that, but it will not work. The Democratic elite want HilIary as much as the Republican elite do not want Trump. Seems both parties have their own agenda and it has nothing to do with what the people want.

you can't say that yet.... unlike Mr.Trump, Mr Sanders has not garnered more votes from the voters than Hillary....like Mr. Trump has.....on the RNC side....

The very concept of Super Delegates belies that.

When they created them, yes.

However, the Super delegates since they were created have always moved towards the candidate with the most popular votes..... 2008 was harder than all other years because Obama and Hillary were in a virtual tie nearly the entire primary...

Then please explain how hiLIARy wins the Super Delegates in states where Bernie won the popular vote?

Because the super delegates are not beholden to the popular vote. Hence thew term "super".....

 

[TheOldSchool]

They will not listen............

They will; but money speaks. And Soros is paying for HIllary.

Actually I think he's under your bed