Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Should a woman have the choice to abort her child moments after it being born even if the child is healthy?
Not only should there be almost no restrictions on abortion, but we as a society should have a crime called
WORTHLESS SOCIETAL LIABILITY
where, if you are found to be able to work, and you go 5 years doing nothing but dope/crime/begging, you are SHOT.
PRO DEATH - the only way to avoid the total catastrophe of human overpopulation
that's already been tried.
There are plenty of ways to prevent becoming pregnant.
There are plenty of ways to prevent becoming pregnant.
Yeah, like shooting crack whores for being
WORTHLESS SOCIETAL LIABILITIES
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Should a woman have the choice to abort her child moments after it being born even if the child is healthy?
What are you talking about? It must be pointed out to you that your question involves infants who have already been born, so there is no question of aborting, as there is nothing in the woman's uterus. You are being absurd.
No, no, let him talk. These people need to be exposed for the monsters they are and he is doing a fine job at it.There are plenty of ways to prevent becoming pregnant.
Yeah, like shooting crack whores for being
WORTHLESS SOCIETAL LIABILITIES
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
The question is about our humanity. For example, the Third Reich viewed Jews as vermin and not their equal. This then gave them license to treat them like cattle.
So you're wrong. This is the primary role of government, to defend our innate rights.
The "innate rights" of something that doesn't exist yet?
I your opinion, can one be pro-choice politically (respecting a woman right to her own baby factory), and yet pro life personally?
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Should a woman have the choice to abort her child moments after it being born even if the child is healthy?
The Founding Fathers got tired of trying to convince people they had God given rights, so they had to take action.Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
The question is about our humanity. For example, the Third Reich viewed Jews as vermin and not their equal. This then gave them license to treat them like cattle.
So you're wrong. This is the primary role of government, to defend our innate rights.
The "innate rights" of something that doesn't exist yet?
No, the innate rights of someone who exists whether YOU are educated enough to know it or not.
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Should a woman have the choice to abort her child moments after it being born even if the child is healthy?
There is a federal law that says no, even if it is not healthy, the child must receive care.
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Should a woman have the choice to abort her child moments after it being born even if the child is healthy?
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
ShoutYourAbortion - Wikipedia
Sorry, but unless medically nessasary or due to something like rape, a elective abortion due to the inconvenience of having a kid is something to be ashamed of. There are plenty of ways to prevent becoming pregnant.
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Should a woman have the choice to abort her child moments after it being born even if the child is healthy?
But you see, Lice's tiny peabrain is capable of wrapping around the fact that the baby exists at that point, which magically makes it all real.
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Should a woman have the choice to abort her child moments after it being born even if the child is healthy?
There is a federal law that says no, even if it is not healthy, the child must receive care.
No, no, let him talk. These people need to be exposed for the monsters they are and he is doing a fine job at it.There are plenty of ways to prevent becoming pregnant.
Yeah, like shooting crack whores for being
WORTHLESS SOCIETAL LIABILITIES
Sanders tells the truth about his stance on any issue.
You may disagree, but he means what he says.