imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 10,786
- 4,732
- 400
- Thread starter
- #61
Yes I find it funny. You are playing with fire and are apparently too stupid to realize it.Playing games is not my thing. Let the left sort out their own bullshit. Last thing we need is this type of stupid shit done to BOTH PARTIES in 2024 and ending up with loons on BOTH SIDES.
You are wrong! In 2024, both parties are going to be nominating new people. They are going to be worried about their own people.
In this case we have here, we are either trying to put forth Trump, OR trying to insure fairness.
Now then, do we believe/disbelieve, that BERNARD got the shaft in 2016, that is the question?
Forget the fact his nomination would help the GOP! That is NOT pertinent or germaine to this discussion.
The fact of the matter is---------------->even if BERNARD is up by loads of delegates going into the convention, unless he can win on the 1st ballot, he is TOAST there after.
IS THAT FAIR after his treatment in 2016? Is that how America does business?
We HAVE the ability as Conservatives to right the ship of the republic, and guess what--------->if in the end we LOSE to BERNARD, we have done the correct and fair thing to do. Not to mention-------->if we LOSE to BERNARD, then we couldn't beat any of them to start with!
After being SCREWED, BERNARD deserves a shot, and so does his supporters. To deny that is Anti-American. And remember-------->righting this wrong is NOT because the GOP screwed him and his followers, but because the DNC screwed them!
If we can NOT see the irony of crossing over to produce a BERNARD victory in the DNC primary, then we are the reincarnation of Helen Keller, before she was taught ANYTHING!
You find that funny Murkel? Tell me what I stated in post 57 that was inaccurate!
I'm sure you'll wake up to it when it happens to our party.
Well then, you stand against 2 billion of DOOMSBERG. If money equates to political power, we lose!
Sure, we can point at Trump over Hilly, but that was the exception, not the norm.
And notice------------->they are letting DOOMBERG in for his cash. Trump won spending LESS; DOOMBERG is going to spend more, much, much, more.
If that is how you want your elections run, then go for it!
One thing I agree with on the Democratic side is------------>National elections should be financed by the public, and it should be equal. It is EXACTLY why all of these people REFUSE public funding. They get their lobbyists to pony up cash, which means they are kissing lobbyist a**, and that isn't to good for all of us pleebs.
DOOMBERG can buy this election if he wants to, even the Democrats know this. He has announced 2 billion of his wealth towards this. What if he changes it to 4?
You understand that if that works, your next President will probably be the head of Facebook, or maybe Microsoft, or possibly Google! That is the can of worms you are opening.
Remember this----------->the Left could make this case if Trump had spent MORE than Hilly. He didn't! But DOOMBERG has promised more, much more!
That should be enough to turn both sides off, but somehow, I am not seeing it.