sealybobo said:
So his goal isn't to help others. Got it
You don't read or connect dots very well, do you, Sillybooboo?
You said it might just be to vex me. What are his goals? Do you even know? It certainly doesn't seem to help anybody but himself. Lets see how helpful he is the next 4 years. Lets see how much people thank him.
You seem to know his nefarious motives, Please explain them and back them with your souces, Sillybooboo
I just want to get an answer to a simple yes or no question. If you are confirmed to lead HUD, you will be responsible for issuing billions of dollars in grants and loans to help develop housing and provide a lot of housing-related services. Now, housing development is an area in which President-elect Trump and his family have significant business interests. Can you assure me that not a single taxpayer dollar that you give out will financially benefit the president-elect or his family?
Carson tried to play upon the image that he is a man of morals and values saying, “I can assure you that the things that I do are driven by a sense of morals and values, and therefore, I will absolutely not play favorites for anyone.”
‘It’s not about your good faith. My concern is whether or not, among the billions of dollars you will be responsible for handing out in grants and loans, can you just assure us that not $1 will go to benefit either the president-elect or his family?’
Again, on point from the persistent Warren. To his credit, Carson provided a decent answer to her question responding:
‘It will not be my intention to do anything to benefit any American. It’s for all Americans everything that we do.’
NOT HIS INTENTION? So it will be unintentional?
‘The reason you can’t assure us of that is because the president-elect is hiding his family’s business interests from you, from me, from the rest of America. And this just highlights the absurdity and the danger of the president-elect’s refusal to put his assets into a true blind trust. He knows, he, the president-elect knows, what will benefit him and his family financially. But the public doesn’t, which means he can divert taxpayer money into his own pockets without anyone knowing about it.’
sealybobo said:
So his goal isn't to help others. Got it
You don't read or connect dots very well, do you, Sillybooboo?
You said it might just be to vex me. What are his goals? Do you even know? It certainly doesn't seem to help anybody but himself. Lets see how helpful he is the next 4 years. Lets see how much people thank him.
You seem to know his nefarious motives, Please explain them and back them with your souces, Sillybooboo
I just want to get an answer to a simple yes or no question. If you are confirmed to lead HUD, you will be responsible for issuing billions of dollars in grants and loans to help develop housing and provide a lot of housing-related services. Now, housing development is an area in which President-elect Trump and his family have significant business interests. Can you assure me that not a single taxpayer dollar that you give out will financially benefit the president-elect or his family?
Carson tried to play upon the image that he is a man of morals and values saying, “I can assure you that the things that I do are driven by a sense of morals and values, and therefore, I will absolutely not play favorites for anyone.”
‘It’s not about your good faith. My concern is whether or not, among the billions of dollars you will be responsible for handing out in grants and loans, can you just assure us that not $1 will go to benefit either the president-elect or his family?’
Again, on point from the persistent Warren. To his credit, Carson provided a decent answer to her question responding:
‘It will not be my intention to do anything to benefit any American. It’s for all Americans everything that we do.’
NOT HIS INTENTION? So it will be unintentional?
‘The reason you can’t assure us of that is because the president-elect is hiding his family’s business interests from you, from me, from the rest of America. And this just highlights the absurdity and the danger of the president-elect’s refusal to put his assets into a true blind trust. He knows, he, the president-elect knows, what will benefit him and his family financially. But the public doesn’t, which means he can divert taxpayer money into his own pockets without anyone knowing about it.’
so you don't know of any nefarious intentions from Ben Carson. Got it.
Not yet but they just got started. Give them time.
Ben Carson has called one plan for fair housing a “
mandated social-engineering scheme.” Trump himself has also expressed disdain for many of Obama’s housing policies, especially those trying to reduce segregation, which is perhaps not surprising for a man who got his start in real estate by
refusing to rent to minorities in New York.
The retired neurosurgeon turned Trump adviser has little direct experience with fair-housing issues, but that didn’t stop him from once likening the discrimination laws to communism.
While it is somewhat unclear as to what Carson’s goals would be in the position, he has criticized a
recent HUD fair-housing rule, which requires local communities to assess patterns of income and racial discrimination in housing.
Should Carson be confirmed for the position, he would have authority over the way in which the new HUD provision is rolled out. And it would appear, that he’s no fan of it.
Carson argued “It is true that the Fair Housing Act and other laws have greatly reduced explicit discrimination in housing, but significant disparities in housing availability and quality persist,” he wrote. “To address them, the Obama administration’s new agency rules rely on a tortured reading of the Fair Housing laws to empower the
Department of Housing and Urban Development to ‘affirmatively promote’ fair housing, even in the absence of explicit discrimination.”
That latter preventative element is what seems to bother Carson so much.
In the same piece, he also criticized a Supreme Court decision,
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, that kept a provision of federal law banning housing discrimination.
“These government-engineered attempts to legislate racial equality create consequences that often make matters worse,” Carson wrote. “There are reasonable ways to use housing policy to enhance the opportunities available to lower-income citizens, but based on the history of failed socialist experiments in this country, entrusting the government to get it right can prove downright dangerous.”
But given the HUD position, Carson would, in part, be the very person entrusted to get it right.
In an
interview with an Iowa radio station in 2015, Carson railed against an agreement between the city of Dubuque and HUD that sought to address the way in which the city gave out federally funded housing vouchers. Dubuque essentially agreed to not discriminate in their distribution of the vouchers against people moving to the area from primarily black urban areas.
Jan Mickelson, a local talk-radio host, described the stipulation to Carson, saying that “people in eastern Iowa, for instance, have to recruit from Chicago their poverty-afflicted individuals to bring them to Iowa in order to qualify for Section 8 housing.”
Carson was surprised and described the process as federal overreaching.
“This is just an example of what happens when we allow the government to infiltrate every part of our lives,” Carson
said. “This is what you see in communist countries where they have so many regulations encircling every aspect of your life that if you don’t agree with them, all they have to do is pull the noose. And this is what we’ve got now. Every month, dozens of regulations—business, industry, academia, every aspect of our lives—so that they can control you.”
While Carson’s comments could be attributed to the fact that he lacks experience in the housing sector, that’s exactly why his apparent selection has left a number of
experts baffled at the choice.
“I am astounded at the suggestion that Ben Carson would be nominated to serve as HUD secretary,” Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, told
CityLab. “HUD is among the most important federal agencies tasked with ensuring compliance with the Fair Housing Act, and creating affordable and inclusive communities.”
Not to mention Carson himself dismissed the possibility of serving inside the Trump administration less than two weeks ago.
On Nov. 15, Carson had decided not to seek a Cabinet position in Trump’s administration, saying “I believe it is vitally important for the Trump administration to have many outspoken friends and advisers who are outside of the Washington bubble,” in a
statement on his Facebook page. “It is vital to have independent voices of reason and reconciliation if our nation is to heal and regain its greatness. I will continue to work with the transition team and beyond as we build a dynamite executive branch of government.”
This was on the same day that his business manager and frequent spokesman Armstrong Williams
said “Dr. Carson feels he has no government experience, he’s never run a federal agency. The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency.”