Ben Carson seems to know nothing about the US's allies

Yeah we know that you think that black people are stupid, so tell me how he got to be a neurosurgeon then? Affirmative Action?
Obviously he's intelligent, he is just incompetent. He is, as Bill Maher puts, "a dumb smart person."

I mean come on. The video speaks for itself don't you think?
 
Yeah we know that you think that black people are stupid, so tell me how he got to be a neurosurgeon then? Affirmative Action?
Obviously he's intelligent, he is just incompetent. He is, as Bill Maher puts, "a dumb smart person."

I mean come on. The video speaks for itself don't you think?

No. You only see what you want to see. You actually think that someone, anyone, could go through that many years of education and not be able to name an ally? You're fooling only yourself, racist.
 
Yeah we know that you think that black people are stupid, so tell me how he got to be a neurosurgeon then? Affirmative Action?
Obviously he's intelligent, he is just incompetent. He is, as Bill Maher puts, "a dumb smart person."

I mean come on. The video speaks for itself don't you think?

No. You only see what you want to see. You actually think that someone, anyone, could go through that many years of education and not be able to name an ally? You're fooling only yourself, racist.
Lol um okay. So why didn't he just answer the question? Surely you have a theory.
 
Yeah we know that you think that black people are stupid, so tell me how he got to be a neurosurgeon then? Affirmative Action?
Obviously he's intelligent, he is just incompetent. He is, as Bill Maher puts, "a dumb smart person."

I mean come on. The video speaks for itself don't you think?

No. You only see what you want to see. You actually think that someone, anyone, could go through that many years of education and not be able to name an ally? You're fooling only yourself, racist.
Lol um okay. So why didn't he just answer the question? Surely you have a theory.

You are racist and ignorant. That's an unfortunate combo there pal. Good luck with that.
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
 
Yeah we know that you think that black people are stupid, so tell me how he got to be a neurosurgeon then? Affirmative Action?
Obviously he's intelligent, he is just incompetent. He is, as Bill Maher puts, "a dumb smart person."

I mean come on. The video speaks for itself don't you think?

No. You only see what you want to see. You actually think that someone, anyone, could go through that many years of education and not be able to name an ally? You're fooling only yourself, racist.
Lol um okay. So why didn't he just answer the question? Surely you have a theory.

You are racist and ignorant. That's an unfortunate combo there pal. Good luck with that.


You must be looking in the mirror. The OP of this thread has not made any racist remarks.
 
Yeah we know that you think that black people are stupid, so tell me how he got to be a neurosurgeon then? Affirmative Action?
Obviously he's intelligent, he is just incompetent. He is, as Bill Maher puts, "a dumb smart person."

I mean come on. The video speaks for itself don't you think?

No. You only see what you want to see. You actually think that someone, anyone, could go through that many years of education and not be able to name an ally? You're fooling only yourself, racist.
Lol um okay. So why didn't he just answer the question? Surely you have a theory.

You are racist and ignorant. That's an unfortunate combo there pal. Good luck with that.
So do you dislike Hillary because you are a sexist?
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
Lol if he had a basic understanding of geopolitics, he would know who to pick first. He would know the importance of starting with certain nations over others.
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
Lol if he had a basic understanding of geopolitics, he would know who to pick first. He would know the importance of starting with certain nations over others.
Should he call the Brits before the French or the other way around? How much does it matter? Will the coalition break down if he calls Jordan before Saudi arabia?
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
Lol if he had a basic understanding of geopolitics, he would know who to pick first. He would know the importance of starting with certain nations over others.
Should he call the Brits before the French or the other way around? How much does it matter? Will the coalition break down if he calls Jordan before Saudi arabia?


He could get a list of Bush's "coalition of the willing", better known as "coalition of the billing" or even "coalition of the shilling." :)
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
Lol if he had a basic understanding of geopolitics, he would know who to pick first. He would know the importance of starting with certain nations over others.
Should he call the Brits before the French or the other way around? How much does it matter? Will the coalition break down if he calls Jordan before Saudi arabia?
Lol it's amazing the lengths you people go to defend republicans. First of all, it's dumb to not pick someone first. Our closest allies, Britain and France, would have been a solid choice to start. Or perhaps pick a country in the Middle East, like you know Israel lol. Not only are they close allies but they have advanced militaries. He could have picked an Arab country nearby and said why that nation would have a strategic advantage.

Even if he didn't believe order mattered, he could have just said "order doesn't matter" but that of course would have been a vague, cop out answer.
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
Lol if he had a basic understanding of geopolitics, he would know who to pick first. He would know the importance of starting with certain nations over others.
Should he call the Brits before the French or the other way around? How much does it matter? Will the coalition break down if he calls Jordan before Saudi arabia?
Lol it's amazing the lengths you people go to defend republicans. First of all, it's dumb to not pick someone first. Our closest allies, Britain and France, would have been a solid choice to start. Or perhaps pick a country in the Middle East, like you know Israel lol. Not only are they close allies but they have advanced militaries. He could have picked an Arab country nearby and said why that nation would have a strategic advantage.

Even if he didn't believe order mattered, he could have just said "order doesn't matter" but that of course would have been a vague, cop out answer.
Thanks for admitting that there is not a correct answer to the question.
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
Lol if he had a basic understanding of geopolitics, he would know who to pick first. He would know the importance of starting with certain nations over others.
Should he call the Brits before the French or the other way around? How much does it matter? Will the coalition break down if he calls Jordan before Saudi arabia?
Lol it's amazing the lengths you people go to defend republicans. First of all, it's dumb to not pick someone first. Our closest allies, Britain and France, would have been a solid choice to start. Or perhaps pick a country in the Middle East, like you know Israel lol. Not only are they close allies but they have advanced militaries. He could have picked an Arab country nearby and said why that nation would have a strategic advantage.

Even if he didn't believe order mattered, he could have just said "order doesn't matter" but that of course would have been a vague, cop out answer.
Thanks for admitting that there is not a correct answer to the question.
Lol come on, don't be a stooge. If Hillary was in this interview and not Carson, you would not shut up about it and you know it.
 
Chris Wallace was hung up on who to call FIRST. Carson did not seem to believe that the order of who to call was of the utmost importance. He certainly could have answered the question better; he could of perhaps named several countries that would be important in such a coalition and then say which one is first doesn't matter, just pick one and get the job done.
Lol if he had a basic understanding of geopolitics, he would know who to pick first. He would know the importance of starting with certain nations over others.
Should he call the Brits before the French or the other way around? How much does it matter? Will the coalition break down if he calls Jordan before Saudi arabia?
Lol it's amazing the lengths you people go to defend republicans. First of all, it's dumb to not pick someone first. Our closest allies, Britain and France, would have been a solid choice to start. Or perhaps pick a country in the Middle East, like you know Israel lol. Not only are they close allies but they have advanced militaries. He could have picked an Arab country nearby and said why that nation would have a strategic advantage.

Even if he didn't believe order mattered, he could have just said "order doesn't matter" but that of course would have been a vague, cop out answer.
Thanks for admitting that there is not a correct answer to the question.
That being said, it was a BS question deserving a BS answer, and Carson was caught of guard.
 

Forum List

Back
Top