Ben and Jerry’s Still Refuses to Return Stolen Indigenous Land

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
96,199
Reaction score
69,201
Points
3,605
Location
Right coast, classified
It’s been a year now. They still even have it up on their website.
Why are Leftists such land thieves from minorities?
IMG_2597.webp

 
Victims of history. Time to move on and quit trying to destroy the best nation ever created. For all people, even the indians.
 
Victims of history. Time to move on and quit trying to destroy the best nation ever created. For all people, even the indians.
Doubtable, elketra, particularly for indigenous peoples.
 
Their ice cream might have fancy names but it's the same as any other factory made stuff. The difference is that the two hypocrites jumped into the political arena before they understood what they were doing. Now their product is tainted with liberalism.
 
Like everything with the left - surrendering land, paying taxes, do without for the environment- it’s always about others, never themselves.
 
Last edited:
Ben and Jerry aren't so woke after all.

Frauds

They pretend to be though.


Really. What company, let alone an ice creme company would dive in head first into political and social agendas?

Don't they realize they gain nothing? So they scream social agenda woke shit and lose 1 customer like myself, but do they really gain 2 customers that they didn't already have?

When a company takes a stance like they do I'd wager they lose more customers than ones they gain. Even if they did gain and lose the same amount then what was the point of breaking even?

I saw a commercial on YouTube last night by them that mentioned abortion rights. Why? I have refused to buy their products a long time ago once they went heavy into the BLM garbage and I'll never buy their ice cream again.
 
It’s been a year now. They still even have it up on their website.
Why are Leftists such land thieves from minorities?

Ben and Jerry's sucks as an ice cream. But to be sure, a few FACTS:
  1. Every country exists on stolen land. Go back far enough and you will find that almost everywhere, whatever people live there today, at one time beforehand, they went to war with a conquered people that lived there before and took the land for themselves. Survival of the strongest.
  2. Even the Native Indians here are technically not indigenous--- our best evidence suggests they came over the Aleutian/Siberian land bridge into North America about 23,000 years ago. Then proceeded to slaughter the Woolly Mammoth, Giant Ground Sloth and other species to extinction for food. They were still a nomadic, tribal, loosely neolithic community when they were met by 15th century Spanish with ships, swords, and muskets. No contest. Then there were the diseases we brought which they had no immunity to.
But yeah, the Indians were lied to, cheated and almost exterminated, and by rights, should have been given far more rights to a lot more land than they have today.
 
Almost all indigenous peoples had their lands stolen: fact.

None of our ancestors are guilt free.
 
It’s been a year now. They still even have it up on their website.
Why are Leftists such land thieves from minorities?
View attachment 972156
I saw that article way back. Idiots who complain about who had the land first, couldn't specify which tribe should get what area if some of it was given back. The Sioux were driven out of the Great Lakes region by the Iroquois and the Ojibwe. Upon being pushed west, they fought and drove other tribes out of the Dakotas. So, who would you give what to?
The situation is that any person having been born on this continent IS a "native american." A poll done with the tribes found that the majority actually preferred that collectively, they preferred the term "American Indian," when not using their preferred tribal affiliation. But, the left being the left, they'll just go on using the term the left prefers. Native American.
 
Victims of history. Time to move on and quit trying to destroy the best nation ever created. For all people, even the indians.
".....even the indians." <<< that's like saying 'black africans
were lucky to be enslaved by DA WHITE MAN---because
the slaves were given the GIFT OF CHRISTIANITY
 
".....even the indians." <<< that's like saying 'black africans
were lucky to be enslaved by DA WHITE MAN---because
the slaves were given the GIFT OF CHRISTIANITY
No, it is not like that all.
Irosie91, your reply is a great example of what you project onto my comments. Irosie, you replied as a bigot. You did not bother to ask for more information. You have no idea of the perspective based on historical fact I was willing to share had someone shown interest.

Instead I get irosie91, who knows nothing of indians and even more obvious. Irosie knows bothing of, "da white man."
 
No, it is not like that all.
Irosie91, your reply is a great example of what you project onto my comments. Irosie, you replied as a bigot. You did not bother to ask for more information. You have no idea of the perspective based on historical fact I was willing to share had someone shown interest.

Instead I get irosie91, who knows nothing of indians and even more obvious. Irosie knows bothing of, "da white man."
your comment was an insult to Indians----In fact, I have known several ethnic Indians living in the AREA (but not the
actual town) of my childhood. I is da "white woman" Any
suggestion that native americans (north americans) benefitted, culturally, by the "white" conquest of North America is-----an insult
 
Back
Top Bottom