Christians are taking part in this discussion because they subconsciously want answers that their religion can't answer and their faith isn't 'good enough' any longer.
At least the 'literal' belief in their bible is evaporating away and they're turning to trying to find other meaning in their religious beliefs. Some are even feeling betrayed by their churches turning to accept evolution! How can they possibly reconcile both creation and evolution together?
Many aren't satisfied with no answers to their questions and so they believe they could find answers in this kind of discussion. But alas, this discussion even in zone 1 has gone south.
Religious belief must be established in a child's formative years when he/she is still not capable of questioning. That requires the children having parents that are thoroughly indoctrinated themselves, but that's not happening nearly as much now.
What? Another individual with the gift of "Clairvoyance".........the ability to read the subconscious minds of others? Just how do you know what another person "......subconsciously wants"?
Evolution? How can one reject evolution? Its simple: Applied Science........every attempt made to reproduce life as defined by the supposed theory of evolution has been falsified by the Scientific Method of Experimentation that consists of Observation, Reproduction with consistency every time the experiment is applied. There has not been "one" successful attempt to reproduce life from non living matter as stated as the basic tenet of Evolution. On the flip side.........science agrees with the definition of life provided in the Holy Scriptures..........life can only be reproduced via preexisting life within the same species as defined by Louis Pasteur when he debunked abiogenesis in the 19th century. Truth does not evolve.
The Holy Scriptures and the CREATION model have never been subject to falsification by the Scientific Method..........NEVER!
What's more logical to accept as truth..... A model that has never been falsified or a theory that has been falsified with every attempt to reproduce that theory into reality in the lab?
The scriptures agree with the experimentation of Pasteur......100%. "And then God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind; cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind": and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good." -- Genesis 1:24-25
Some attempt to define Change within species as EVOLUTION........when in reality all species were created with the DNA required to adapt to its surroundings........there are no examples of life having ever evolved outside the species from which it originated. All life on earth share their DNA signatures to a point......why? Believe all life forms on earth are CARBON based. If mankind was not created with the ability to change to his surroundings he would have became extinct the first time he came into contact with the common cold virus.
Mutation? Mutation corrupts a perfectly healthy DNA signature, it does not add information, it takes away from the perfect. Every time the pseudo scientist digs up a mutated (imperfect) fossil from the past they declare it as a NEW SPECIES never seen before. Example: Finding examples of early man in a cave in Europe.......and declaring they are a subspecies of modern man because of the deformed heads and bones..........when they never consider the reality of what they might have found, an example of isolated family members that inbreed to the point of deformity. Why is this hypothesis neve considered? Its misses their target of speculation, assumption and conjectures.
There has never been an example of one life form evolving into another. Some attempt the con game of suggesting that Birds have evolved from Dinosaurs...........when in reality, they can't even agree upon the hypothesis that defines the dinosaur as being warm blooded or cold blooded.
Ask your own "nanny state" government if Dinosaurs were warm blooded or cold blooded. They can't agree........so they made up a new status.......dinosaurs were BOTH warm and cold blooded at the same instant. They can't prove either........so the knock an arrow from their quiver..........point it at the side of a big barn...........and release the arrow, then they rush up to the barn, draw a bullseye target around the arrow and say, "See.........we never miss our target." Its called Circular Logic. You begin with a predetermined ANSWER and then seek the question to agree with the opinionated answer.
www.usgs.gov/faqs/were-dinosaurs-warm-blooded-or-cold-blooded
