pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,363
- 33,401
- 2,250
That's quite a weak denial. LMAO. Pathetic.
I see nothing to gain.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's quite a weak denial. LMAO. Pathetic.
Prison time would mean laws against free speech, so no.Consequences of what? Not wanting to be around someone? Prison time for that?
More like being marginalized and ignored.Consequences of what? Not wanting to be around someone? Prison time for that?
Maybe you need to take a better look at he person being marginalized instead. There could very well be very good reasons.More like being marginalized and ignored.
But I'm with you on the free speech thing. If I'm dealing with a racist, I'd like to know where they stand, I want them to feel comfortable telling the truth about their views so I can comfortably avoid them.
Exactly - "the person being marginalized" - the person. Tell me about the person, not their ancestry.Maybe you need to take a better look at the person being marginalized instead. There could very well be very good reasons.
Look at the way you treat people with different political views. You people are the bigots and bullies.
I said nothing about their ancestry. People are individuals. They are responsible for their actions not their great grandfather.Exactly - "the person being marginalized" - the person. Tell me about the person, not their ancestry.
In my view, racism is the ugliest form of identity politics. I think it's utterly stupid. But people have a right to be stupid.
![]()
There is no white genocide.Western europe better wake up fast
Nah they won't
View attachment 808665
gee i wonder where we've seen this before
View attachment 808666
View attachment 808667
Yeah, unless your great great great grandfather fought the british in the Revolutionary war. You are responsible for fixing damage caused.I said nothing about their ancestry. People are individuals. They are responsible for their actions not their great grandfather.
Even if true? Someone publicly says that blacks are intellectually inferior to other races, a fact clearly established by every measure, thrn the truth has to have consequences.Of what they say. All free speech carries both responsibilities and consequences.
What you say would be true if most blacks behaved and performed as well as most whites.
Hostility against Orientals is unjustified because most Orientals behave and perform better than most whites.
Why is it immoral to tell the truth?
It is not true that whites are smarter than blacks, because that would assert that all whites are smarter than all blacks. No one believes that. Nevertheless, the races differ significantly in average intelligence. That is a significant fact when debating issues like affirmative action and racial reparations.A race is smarter
B race can run faster
C race is better at building things
D race is physically stronger
Okay.
Let's say for the sake of argument that is or could all be scientifically proven. What does that profit anyone? Am I then to look at all people outside of A and say "Well, they're stupid, we should stop educating them at 8th grade"?
Or all people outside of B and D and say, "Yeah, we're not even going to allow those kids to try out for our sports teams. They're no good at sports."
That seems counterproductive if there are exceptions in every case, and the exceptions are not even rare.
Beyond that, we have a lot, and I mean a LOT, of race mixing these days (which I'm sure shatters your heart). So now what? What of the child whose dad is black and mom is white...then she goes on to marry a white man?
That's why what you say is immaterial to me. Even if true, the endgame is all detrimental and not beneficial.
How do you define "racist?"Truth is you are a racist. Is that an immoral truth?
I think that it has to do with percentages.I worked around them and lived with them for years. Some are ok people, but a lot are brutal animals.
Tucker is right. There is freedom in America. We have the right to choose our friends. If only we had more people fighting the good fight like Tucker Carlson.
---Tucker Carlson says ‘being racist is not a crime’---
MSN
www.msn.com
Got to disagree with this ^^^. It is more useless PC crap semantics. There is no difference between calling a person from Asia Oriental or Asian. That portion of the world has been known as the Orient for centuries. So it stands to reason that someone from there could be reasonably called Oriental or Asian interchangeably. I have never heard of any logical reason for the change. PC police.I'm sorry but is this 1923? "Orientals"? I lol'ed though...geez
I use "Oriental" to mean China and nations that learned civilization from China. These are Korea, Japan, and Vietnam. I do not use it in a derogatory way. I like Orientals, and Oriental culture.Got to disagree with this ^^^. It is more useless PC crap semantics. There is no difference between calling a person from Asia Oriental or Asian. That portion of the world has been known as the Orient for centuries. So it stands to reason that someone from there could be reasonably called Oriental or Asian interchangeably. I have never heard of any logical reason for the change. PC police.