PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #141
Never heard that one...crazy shytte from the Great Dementor...
"Never heard that one.."
Pretty much covers everything for you, doesn't it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never heard that one...crazy shytte from the Great Dementor...
Doesn't that kind of mess up the premise of the OP? "Being Liberal Makes You a Fascist "
Uhmmmmmmmm . . . . no. This is going right over your head, isn't it?
Please explain how a Fascist and National Socialist states that: ""Both in theory and practice, National Socialism opposes liberalism. ". That alone refutes the OP. Maybe it's going over your head?
it's pathetic that very few "Progressives" cant admit who they really are; socialists or actual communist-leaning morons.
So, the Left....the Liberals/Democrats/Progressives....invented a term they could use in place of "censorship."
"Hate speech."
13. "By hate speech, they mean anything that offends someone else. Speaking out against homosexuality in any way could be considered to be hate speech. The televised sermon of a preacher quoting the Bible in his sermon could be considered hate speech if someone hears it and becomes offended because they are being convicted of their of the sins.
Anyone writing or posting on the Internet that criticizes homosexuals, liberal Democrats, Muslims or illegal aliens could be considered to be engaging in hate crimes. In fact, Alex Nogales, President & CEO of the National Hispanic Media Coalition supports the bill, saying:
I thank Senator Markey for his career-long commitment to ensuring that we have the data necessary to confront and combat hate speech in the media that targets our most vulnerable communities. NHMC has long-recognized that an update to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration's 1993 report, The Role of Telecommunications in Hate Crimes, is long overdue and desperately needed given the incredible evolution of our communications systems over the past 21 years as well as the ever-increasing numbers of hate crimes targeting Latinos and others. As the author of the original piece of legislation directing the 1993 report, there is nobody better than Senator Markey to join Congressman Hakeem Jeffries and others in calling on the NTIA to study this pressing issue once again.
Senator Introduces Bill to Silence Christians and Conservatives
How come none of our board Lefties are ready to jump on board? Hey...you voted for these guys.....that's your team out there.....the Fascists!
There is no such thing as a "hate crime." Crime itself is an act of hate or total disregard for others or their property. This legislation was passed in order to stamp out political opposition to all the ridiculous cultural propaganda from the left. the gay boy that was killed in Wyoming was killed by his gay lover and it was over drugs. He was not crucified on the fence and the reason for this misconception was the coverage by the NY Times, a newspaper whose credentials are questionable at best.
it's pathetic that very few "Progressives" cant admit who they really are; socialists or actual communist-leaning morons.
I'm certain that my point has been proven. As an good fascist, 'reliable Democrat voter,' you find it impossible to criticize Reid and the indefensible attempts to silence any opposing voice.
So...what you evince is a puerile changing of the subject.
Or.....grow a pair and take a stance on the topic.
You have no point! Your premise is based on biased spin.
You wrote (presumably with a straight face):
PoliticalXerox said:3. In recent weeks, people across the political spectrum professed to be aghast when a small coterie of "offended" students shut down commencement speeches by conservatives, centrists and liberals.
4. How, the world of astonished adults wondered, have these students come to believe they could shut people up on any aggrieved whim? They got it from the Majority Leader of the United States Senate and 49 senators. They got it from the many adults who think a little restriction on some speech is OK,....
5. It's part of a broader, active effort to define and limit what people can saynot just in politics or sports, but anywhere anyone tries to open his or her mouth.
No students shut down any commencement speeches. Some students protested speakers, but none of the potential speakers were denied their first amendment right to free speech.
This is fact, and it is undeniable.
You know that's not true.
it's pathetic that very few "Progressives" cant admit who they really are; socialists or actual communist-leaning morons.
The ignorant demagoguery came in the 1960's when liberal college prof's tried to associate conservatives with Nazi's.Cultural Dictionary American Heritage
fascism [( fash -iz-uhm)]
A system of government that flourished in Europe from the 1920s to the end of World War II. Germany under Adolf Hitler, Italy under Mussolini, and Spain under Franco were all fascist states. As a rule, fascist governments are dominated by a dictator, who usually possesses a magnetic personality, wears a showy uniform, and rallies his followers by mass parades; appeals to strident nationalism; and promotes suspicion or hatred of both foreigners and impure people within his own nation, such as the Jews in Germany. Although both communism and fascism are forms of totalitarianism, fascism does not demand state ownership of the means of production, nor is fascism committed to the achievement of economic equality. In theory, communism opposes the identification of government with a single charismatic leader (the cult of personality), which is the cornerstone of fascism. Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing.
Correct.
Fascism is on the right side of the political spectrum.
Its ignorant partisan demagoguery on the part of conservatives to seek to associate liberals with fascists.
Common themes of Fascism are reactionaryism, fear of change, diversity, and dissent, as well as authoritarianism, a self-perception of moral superiority, and an advocacy of militarism.
Although modern American conservatives are not fascists, they nonetheless share many common traits as well as the roots of the same political family tree, the doctrine of Social Darwinism in particular.
So, the Left....the Liberals/Democrats/Progressives....invented a term they could use in place of "censorship."
"Hate speech."
13. "By hate speech, they mean anything that offends someone else. Speaking out against homosexuality in any way could be considered to be hate speech. The televised sermon of a preacher quoting the Bible in his sermon could be considered hate speech if someone hears it and becomes offended because they are being convicted of their of the sins.
Anyone writing or posting on the Internet that criticizes homosexuals, liberal Democrats, Muslims or illegal aliens could be considered to be engaging in hate crimes. In fact, Alex Nogales, President & CEO of the National Hispanic Media Coalition supports the bill, saying:
I thank Senator Markey for his career-long commitment to ensuring that we have the data necessary to confront and combat hate speech in the media that targets our most vulnerable communities. NHMC has long-recognized that an update to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration's 1993 report, The Role of Telecommunications in Hate Crimes, is long overdue and desperately needed given the incredible evolution of our communications systems over the past 21 years as well as the ever-increasing numbers of hate crimes targeting Latinos and others. As the author of the original piece of legislation directing the 1993 report, there is nobody better than Senator Markey to join Congressman Hakeem Jeffries and others in calling on the NTIA to study this pressing issue once again.
Senator Introduces Bill to Silence Christians and Conservatives
How come none of our board Lefties are ready to jump on board? Hey...you voted for these guys.....that's your team out there.....the Fascists!
Nope they mean those who "advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate, as de-scribed in the Hate Crime Statistics Act
Hate Crime Statistics Act - Hate Crime Statistics, 2009
But that was just a report they requested isn't it? The hate crime laws are already in place.
There is no question. Just another fact-free cut and paste from the human Xerox machine.
I'm certain that my point has been proven. As an good fascist, 'reliable Democrat voter,' you find it impossible to criticize Reid and the indefensible attempts to silence any opposing voice.
So...what you evince is a puerile changing of the subject.
Or.....grow a pair and take a stance on the topic.
You have no point! Your premise is based on biased spin.
You wrote (presumably with a straight face):
PoliticalXerox said:3. In recent weeks, people across the political spectrum professed to be aghast when a small coterie of "offended" students shut down commencement speeches by conservatives, centrists and liberals.
4. How, the world of astonished adults wondered, have these students come to believe they could shut people up on any aggrieved whim? They got it from the Majority Leader of the United States Senate and 49 senators. They got it from the many adults who think a little restriction on some speech is OK,....
5. It's part of a broader, active effort to define and limit what people can saynot just in politics or sports, but anywhere anyone tries to open his or her mouth.
No students shut down any commencement speeches. Some students protested speakers, but none of the potential speakers were denied their first amendment right to free speech.
This is fact, and it is undeniable.
So, the Left....the Liberals/Democrats/Progressives....invented a term they could use in place of "censorship."
"Hate speech."
13. "By hate speech, they mean anything that offends someone else. Speaking out against homosexuality in any way could be considered to be hate speech. The televised sermon of a preacher quoting the Bible in his sermon could be considered hate speech if someone hears it and becomes offended because they are being convicted of their of the sins.
Anyone writing or posting on the Internet that criticizes homosexuals, liberal Democrats, Muslims or illegal aliens could be considered to be engaging in hate crimes. In fact, Alex Nogales, President & CEO of the National Hispanic Media Coalition supports the bill, saying:
I thank Senator Markey for his career-long commitment to ensuring that we have the data necessary to confront and combat hate speech in the media that targets our most vulnerable communities. NHMC has long-recognized that an update to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration's 1993 report, The Role of Telecommunications in Hate Crimes, is long overdue and desperately needed given the incredible evolution of our communications systems over the past 21 years as well as the ever-increasing numbers of hate crimes targeting Latinos and others. As the author of the original piece of legislation directing the 1993 report, there is nobody better than Senator Markey to join Congressman Hakeem Jeffries and others in calling on the NTIA to study this pressing issue once again.
Senator Introduces Bill to Silence Christians and Conservatives
How come none of our board Lefties are ready to jump on board? Hey...you voted for these guys.....that's your team out there.....the Fascists!
Nope they mean those who "advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate, as de-scribed in the Hate Crime Statistics Act
Hate Crime Statistics Act - Hate Crime Statistics, 2009
But that was just a report they requested isn't it? The hate crime laws are already in place.
Are you pretending that you don't know it's all going to be about interpretation?
Are you?
Nope they mean those who "advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate, as de-scribed in the Hate Crime Statistics Act
Hate Crime Statistics Act - Hate Crime Statistics, 2009
But that was just a report they requested isn't it? The hate crime laws are already in place.
Are you pretending that you don't know it's all going to be about interpretation?
Are you?
Do you have a crystal ball or something?
well, do you?
![]()
I'm certain that my point has been proven. As an good fascist, 'reliable Democrat voter,' you find it impossible to criticize Reid and the indefensible attempts to silence any opposing voice.
So...what you evince is a puerile changing of the subject.
Or.....grow a pair and take a stance on the topic.
You have no point! Your premise is based on biased spin.
You wrote (presumably with a straight face):
PoliticalXerox said:3. In recent weeks, people across the political spectrum professed to be aghast when a small coterie of "offended" students shut down commencement speeches by conservatives, centrists and liberals.
4. How, the world of astonished adults wondered, have these students come to believe they could shut people up on any aggrieved whim? They got it from the Majority Leader of the United States Senate and 49 senators. They got it from the many adults who think a little restriction on some speech is OK,....
5. It's part of a broader, active effort to define and limit what people can saynot just in politics or sports, but anywhere anyone tries to open his or her mouth.
No students shut down any commencement speeches. Some students protested speakers, but none of the potential speakers were denied their first amendment right to free speech.
This is fact, and it is undeniable.
Hey, pal.....I'm going to use your quote in an OP about exactly that.
If you have no objection, it will be with attribution.....if you do object, I'll leave your name off.
RSVP
You have no point! Your premise is based on biased spin.
You wrote (presumably with a straight face):
No students shut down any commencement speeches. Some students protested speakers, but none of the potential speakers were denied their first amendment right to free speech.
This is fact, and it is undeniable.
Hey, pal.....I'm going to use your quote in an OP about exactly that.
If you have no objection, it will be with attribution.....if you do object, I'll leave your name off.
RSVP
You need to start by proving that a job giving a commencement speech is a free speech right.