Being Liberal Makes You a Fascist

[bedowin62]

Desperation, thy name is PoliticalChic.

sayeth the leftard pretending record welfare and food stamps is "forward progress"

 

[PoliticalChic]

Desperation, thy name is PoliticalChic.

What an insipid post......nothing to say about the fascism of your party?

 

[Synthaholic]

Desperation, thy name is PoliticalChic.

What an insipid post......nothing to say about the fascism of your party?

Yes. You don't know the definition of Fascism.

 

[bedowin62]

Desperation, thy name is PoliticalChic.

What an insipid post......nothing to say about the fascism of your party?

Yes. You don't know the definition of Fascism.

sure dork; and you say we dont know the meaning of Socialism either

you say many things in America already are "socialist" in nature: the schools, police, fire departments, libraries

you want MORE of that

but get all butt-hurt when it is rightly pointed out that means you're a socialist

idiots and hypocrites

 

[PoliticalChic]

Desperation, thy name is PoliticalChic.

What an insipid post......nothing to say about the fascism of your party?

Yes. You don't know the definition of Fascism.

What have we here?

The summer school drop out telling the teacher about subject that I just instructed you on....



So....any comment on the fascism of your party....or should we simply agree that you agree whole-heartedly with Reid, and desire to censor any opposing speech....

...you know, like any good fascist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The fact is the greatest liberal of the Wilson era was Robert LaFollette, who opposed WWI, and much of the other crap the author of this thread is trying to pass off as liberalism.

Pop quiz:

Do you know who beat LaFollette in his 1946 run for the Senate?

 

[Synthaholic]

What an insipid post......nothing to say about the fascism of your party?

Yes. You don't know the definition of Fascism.

What have we here?

The summer school drop out telling the teacher about subject that I just instructed you on....



So....any comment on the fascism of your party....or should we simply agree that you agree whole-heartedly with Reid, and desire to censor any opposing speech....

...you know, like any good fascist.

^^^ Still doesn't know the definition of Fascist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes. You don't know the definition of Fascism.

What have we here?

The summer school drop out telling the teacher about subject that I just instructed you on....



So....any comment on the fascism of your party....or should we simply agree that you agree whole-heartedly with Reid, and desire to censor any opposing speech....

...you know, like any good fascist.

^^^ Still doesn't know the definition of Fascist.

Still running from the question.

 

[Plasmaball]

No..

 

[PoliticalChic]

No..

Evidence is strongly to the contrary.

 

[BlindBoo]

Damn, I thought it was Lincoln who was the President of the first Fascist Nation. Maybe that was a Confederate who told me that. But it was Wilson huh? The guy who proposed the League of Nations and gave in on Women's suffrage? Fascist indeed. He was really a racist, why not a fascist too!

No cookies before bedtime for me I guess.

So.....now that you've mended your ways, and agree that Wilson was a fascist as well as a racist....and that Republicans forced him to provide women with the vote,.....is it redundant for me to remind all of how the government functioned under fascist-Progressive Wilson?


Like this:

The Justice Department had its own quasi-official fascisti, the American Protective League, the APL. They has ‘Secret Service’ badges, and were charged with keeping an eye on neighbors, co-workers and friends, including reading neighbor’s mail and listening in on their phones with government approval. Membership exceeded a quarter million. Zinn, Howard, “The Twentieth Century: A People’s History,” p.89-92


a. In Rockford, Illinois, the army asked the APL to extract confessions from 21 black soldiers charged with assaulting white women.
Barry, “The Great Influenza,” p. 124.


b. The APL Vigilante Patrol cracked down on “seditious street oratory,” and as ‘head crackers’ against ‘slackers’ who avoided conscription.





"....keeping an eye on neighbors..."

Brings this to mind:
"The White House is now urging we, the people to turn against one another and report spreading what they deem to be "disinformation" pertaining to the health care debate. From the White House's own website, here is their tyrannical decree:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov." Facts Are Stubborn Things | The White House "
flag@whitehouse.gov asks Americans to send them sources of disinformation in the health care debate - Omaha Sarpy County Conservative | Examiner.com



Another Liberal fascist?

Ah the blending of Liberal, Fascist, and Progressive, then mix in a hundred years of time and whala, a Progressive Racsict becomes a Liberal Fascist.

I think it was his daughter that made the difference in his stance on the 19th Amendment not Republicans.

 

[Synthaholic]

What have we here?

The summer school drop out telling the teacher about subject that I just instructed you on....



So....any comment on the fascism of your party....or should we simply agree that you agree whole-heartedly with Reid, and desire to censor any opposing speech....

...you know, like any good fascist.

^^^ Still doesn't know the definition of Fascist.

Still running from the question.

There is no question. Just another fact-free cut and paste from the human Xerox machine.

 

[bedowin62]

^^^ Still doesn't know the definition of Fascist.

Still running from the question.

There is no question. Just another fact-free cut and paste from the human Xerox machine.

running from actual facts and reality is what left-wing nutjobs do

record welfare and food stamps is their legacy]

but try to get them to admit it

 

[Bush92]

Being a liberal today (there are no "progressives" that movement died out in 1920's) means you are a 1960's Weather Underground communist.

 

[Valerie]

Being a liberal, fascist, socialist, communist, progressive makes you either a blithering idiot, or a criminally insane authoritarian sociopath.

And a bed wetter.

You can NOT have a liberal/socialist/populist government without the use of FORCE.

It just can't be done.

Impossible.

That is why every populist revolution in the History of Man has turned from being a popular/populist movement into a tyrannical, dictatorial, murdering, imprisoning blood-fest.

Every one of them. Every time.

Conservatives and , to a lesser extent, Republicans know this. We eschew populism because we have a brain. We know what happens when populist leaders like Fidel, Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, 'Ugo, Pol Pot, Uncle Ho and every other murdering scumbag leftist in the history of this world takes power.

It isn't so much that we object to the goals -- Egalitarianism isn't really all that bad. Neither is a little bit of wealth redistribution.

Health Care for all is a laudable goal and so is ending poverty.

But here's the rub..... It never stops there.

There are laws that have to be passed to make these things possible.

And Laws are useless without enforcement.

Look at that word for a second or two.

Tell me what you see. What do you see in the word 'enforcement' that libturds are too stupid to understand?

I'll tell you, it is enFORCEment.

You have to enFORCE laws to make them work. Without the use of force (try not paying your taxes and see what happens) none of it works.

Conservatives and most Republicans don't want the government using force on its citizens any more than absolutely necessary.

dimocrap scum want goobermint to FORCE us to do their bidding. To FORCE us to eat they way they want. To FORCE us to think the way they want (ask Donald Sterling or the Dolphins Don Jones) to FORCE us to give up our hard-earned money. To FORCE us to change our morals. To FORCE......

You get the picture.

To dimocrap scum, the goobermint is everything. Know why?

Simple, because they and only they can use FORCE of law to get their way.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth, people.

The only thing that separates them from Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc is that they don't have control of the Army.

That is NOT a point in rhetoric. THAT is a fact.

It is why the hate the Military. Because they know that the United States Military would swat them like a troublesome bug if they tried to do what they really want to do -- Gulags, re-education camps, etc.

That will be the next major battle we wage. To keep dimocrap scum from taking over the Military.

They're trying. Hard. really hard.

And they're making some inroads.

Be aware, people. I'm not kidding when I call dimocraps the scum of the earth.

They're worse than that.

you seem awful emotional about having to live by rule of law.

 

[Pete7469]

At the very least being liberal makes you an idiot.

I'm sure it's been said, but somehow it can't be stressed enough.

 

[Pete7469]

Being a liberal, fascist, socialist, communist, progressive makes you either a blithering idiot, or a criminally insane authoritarian sociopath.

And a bed wetter.

You can NOT have a liberal/socialist/populist government without the use of FORCE.

It just can't be done.

Impossible.

That is why every populist revolution in the History of Man has turned from being a popular/populist movement into a tyrannical, dictatorial, murdering, imprisoning blood-fest.

Every one of them. Every time.

Conservatives and , to a lesser extent, Republicans know this. We eschew populism because we have a brain. We know what happens when populist leaders like Fidel, Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, 'Ugo, Pol Pot, Uncle Ho and every other murdering scumbag leftist in the history of this world takes power.

It isn't so much that we object to the goals -- Egalitarianism isn't really all that bad. Neither is a little bit of wealth redistribution.

Health Care for all is a laudable goal and so is ending poverty.

But here's the rub..... It never stops there.

There are laws that have to be passed to make these things possible.

And Laws are useless without enforcement.

Look at that word for a second or two.

Tell me what you see. What do you see in the word 'enforcement' that libturds are too stupid to understand?

I'll tell you, it is enFORCEment.

You have to enFORCE laws to make them work. Without the use of force (try not paying your taxes and see what happens) none of it works.

Conservatives and most Republicans don't want the government using force on its citizens any more than absolutely necessary.

dimocrap scum want goobermint to FORCE us to do their bidding. To FORCE us to eat they way they want. To FORCE us to think the way they want (ask Donald Sterling or the Dolphins Don Jones) to FORCE us to give up our hard-earned money. To FORCE us to change our morals. To FORCE......

You get the picture.

To dimocrap scum, the goobermint is everything. Know why?

Simple, because they and only they can use FORCE of law to get their way.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth, people.

The only thing that separates them from Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc is that they don't have control of the Army.

That is NOT a point in rhetoric. THAT is a fact.

It is why the hate the Military. Because they know that the United States Military would swat them like a troublesome bug if they tried to do what they really want to do -- Gulags, re-education camps, etc.

That will be the next major battle we wage. To keep dimocrap scum from taking over the Military.

They're trying. Hard. really hard.

And they're making some inroads.

Be aware, people. I'm not kidding when I call dimocraps the scum of the earth.

They're worse than that.

you seem awful emotional about having to live by rule of law.

Laws passed by congress or judicial fiat?

 

[Pete7469]

Being a liberal today (there are no "progressives" that movement died out in 1920's) means you are a 1960's Weather Underground communist.

I just call them ALL bed wetters.

They like to call themselves "progressive", even though history has shown governments founded on marxist philosophy are REGRESSIVE at best.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Being a liberal today (there are no "progressives" that movement died out in 1920's) means you are a 1960's Weather Underground communist.

I just call them ALL bed wetters.

How curious, that's what we call you. Now what?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Damn, I thought it was Lincoln who was the President of the first Fascist Nation. Maybe that was a Confederate who told me that. But it was Wilson huh? The guy who proposed the League of Nations and gave in on Women's suffrage? Fascist indeed. He was really a racist, why not a fascist too!

No cookies before bedtime for me I guess.

So.....now that you've mended your ways, and agree that Wilson was a fascist as well as a racist....and that Republicans forced him to provide women with the vote,.....is it redundant for me to remind all of how the government functioned under fascist-Progressive Wilson?


Like this:

The Justice Department had its own quasi-official fascisti, the American Protective League, the APL. They has ‘Secret Service’ badges, and were charged with keeping an eye on neighbors, co-workers and friends, including reading neighbor’s mail and listening in on their phones with government approval. Membership exceeded a quarter million. Zinn, Howard, “The Twentieth Century: A People’s History,” p.89-92


a. In Rockford, Illinois, the army asked the APL to extract confessions from 21 black soldiers charged with assaulting white women.
Barry, “The Great Influenza,” p. 124.


b. The APL Vigilante Patrol cracked down on “seditious street oratory,” and as ‘head crackers’ against ‘slackers’ who avoided conscription.





"....keeping an eye on neighbors..."

Brings this to mind:
"The White House is now urging we, the people to turn against one another and report spreading what they deem to be "disinformation" pertaining to the health care debate. From the White House's own website, here is their tyrannical decree:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov." Facts Are Stubborn Things | The White House "
flag@whitehouse.gov asks Americans to send them sources of disinformation in the health care debate - Omaha Sarpy County Conservative | Examiner.com



Another Liberal fascist?

Ah the blending of Liberal, Fascist, and Progressive, then mix in a hundred years of time and whala, a Progressive Racsict becomes a Liberal Fascist.

I think it was his daughter that made the difference in his stance on the 19th Amendment not Republicans.

"I think it was his daughter that made the difference in his stance on the 19th Amendment not Republicans."

Then you'd be wrong.



1. It was a Republican who introduced what became the 19th Amendment, women’s suffrage. On May 21, 1919, U.S. Representative James R. Mann (1856-1922), a Republican from Illinois and chairman of the Suffrage Committee, proposed the House resolution to approve the Susan Anthony Amendment granting women the right to vote. The measure passed the House 304-89—a full 42 votes above the required two-thirds majority.
19th Amendment - Women?s History - HISTORY.com


2. The 1919 vote in the House of Representatives was possible because Republicans had retaken control of the House. Attempts to get it passed through Democrat-controlled Congresses had failed.


3. The Senate vote was approved only after a Democrat filibuster; and 82% of the Republican Senators voted for it….and 54% of the Democrats.

4. 26 of the 36 states that ratified the 19th Amendment had Republican legislatures.


5. Two weeks later, on June 4, 1919, the Senate passed the 19th Amendment by two votes over its two-thirds required majority, 56-25. The amendment was then sent to the states for ratification. Within six days of the ratification cycle, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin each ratified the amendment. Kansas, New York and Ohio followed on June 16, 1919. By March of the following year, a total of 35 states had approved the amendment, one state shy of the two-thirds required for ratification. Southern states were adamantly opposed to the amendment, however, and seven of them—Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, South Carolina and Virginia—had already rejected it before Tennessee's vote on August 18, 1920. It was up to Tennessee to tip the scale for woman suffrage.
Op. Cit.


6. The outlook appeared bleak, given the outcomes in other Southern states and given the position of Tennessee's state legislators in their 48-48 tie. The state's decision came down to 23-year-old Representative Harry T. Burn (1895-1977), a Republican from McMinn County, to cast the deciding vote. Although Burn opposed the amendment, his mother convinced him to approve it. (Mrs. Burn reportedly wrote to her son: "Don't forget to be a good boy and help Mrs. Catt put the 'rat' in ratification.") With Burn's vote, the 19th Amendment was ratified. Certification by U.S. Secretary of State Bainbridge Colby (1869-1950) followed on August 26, 1920.
Op. Cit.


7. President Wilson is the chief opponent of their national enfranchisement".[24] Another banner on August 14, 1917, referred to "Kaiser Wilson" and compared the plight of the German people with that of American women. With this manner of protest, the women were subject to arrests and many were jailed.[25] On October 17, Alice Paul was sentenced to seven months and on October 30 began a hunger strike, but after a few days prison authorities began to force feed her.[24] After years of opposition, Wilson changed his position in 1918 to advocate women's suffrage as a war measure.[26] Women's suffrage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




Now....more help in your understanding:
"Ah the blending of Liberal, Fascist, and Progressive,......."

Liberal, Progressive, Democrat, socialist, communist, and fascist....

Each and every one is a philosophy based on big government with the collective primary to the individual. To one degree or another, they all believe in the same doctrine: totalitarianism.


Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right. WORLD | Let's admit who we are | Marvin Olasky | July 17, 2010

Nazi...national socialism....based on nationalism and/or race...
Communism....international socialism.



Study, now.

There will be a short quiz....