Zone1 Behind The 60 Year Republican Plot To Destroy American Democracy

Republicanism, for one. Rule of law.
Still waiting for your explanation of this nonsense you posted. Why is it you all can throw material out with nothing to back it up. This is the clean zone, you're supposed to debate nicely. So let's go, send out the explanation for us.
 
Todays Republicans have evolved directly from the John Birch Society

You're missing the Roy Cohn connection. Cohn was Joe McCarthy's lawyer and advisor, and Donald Trump's mentor. The list of toxic influences embraced by the Republican Party, is endless.

There is Ayn Rand and effect of her writings, giving voice to the notion that the poor are to blame for being poor.

Last but certainly not least is Milton Friedman whose Nobel Prize winning theory, that market capitalism thrived when all regulations, social programs, unions and government ownership of infrastructure was ended. His policies were adopted throughout South American leading to increased poverty and concentration of wealth at the top.

In order to stifle public opposition to the loss of unions, healthcare, and social programs, the CIA backed right wing governments of 1970's South America were forced by the American controlled IMF and World Bank to rewrite their constitutions enshrining these principles and eliminating all leftist notions. In response, right wing dictators throughout the region "disappeared" an entire generation of lawyers, university professors, and union leadership. Anybody who spoke out about the government was taken off the streets in broad daylight, never to be seen or heard from again.

There are echoes of these policies in the Trump Administration already.
 
You're missing the Roy Cohn connection. Cohn was Joe McCarthy's lawyer and advisor, and Donald Trump's mentor. The list of toxic influences embraced by the Republican Party, is endless.

There is Ayn Rand and effect of her writings, giving voice to the notion that the poor are to blame for being poor.

Last but certainly not least is Milton Friedman whose Nobel Prize winning theory, that market capitalism thrived when all regulations, social programs, unions and government ownership of infrastructure was ended. His policies were adopted throughout South American leading to increased poverty and concentration of wealth at the top.

In order to stifle public opposition to the loss of unions, healthcare, and social programs, the CIA backed right wing governments of 1970's South America were forced by the American controlled IMF and World Bank to rewrite their constitutions enshrining these principles and eliminating all leftist notions. In response, right wing dictators throughout the region "disappeared" an entire generation of lawyers, university professors, and union leadership. Anybody who spoke out about the government was taken off the streets in broad daylight, never to be seen or heard from again.

There are echoes of these policies in the Trump Administration already.
Todays Republicans evolved from

The Know Nothings
McCarthyism
John Birch Society
Silent Majority
Reaganism
Tea Party
MAGA
 
You're missing the Roy Cohn connection. Cohn was Joe McCarthy's lawyer and advisor, and Donald Trump's mentor. The list of toxic influences embraced by the Republican Party, is endless.

There is Ayn Rand and effect of her writings, giving voice to the notion that the poor are to blame for being poor.
Oh grand canadian, why are poor poor?
 
That is no more true than saying Democrats have evolved directly from THEIR ROOTS in the KKK.
RW populist
Birchers opposed immigration
Opposed foreign entanglements
Opposed UN
States Rights
Anti Communist
Embraced Conspiracy Theories
 
Last edited:
The founding premise of the modern conservative movement tracks back a generation before Stormer’s book to a Republican thought leader named Russell Kirk.

Kirk argued that the middle class was becoming a threat to America; without clearly defined classes and power structures — essentially without the morbidly rich in complete control of everything — he worried that society would devolve into chaos.

The opening chapter of his book was about Edmund Burke, the Irish conservative who wrote, in 1790, that hairdressers and candlemakers should not be allowed to run for political office or even to vote:

“The occupation of a hairdresser or of a working tallow-chandler cannot be a matter of honor to any person — to say nothing of a number of other more servile employments. Such descriptions of men ought not to suffer oppression from the state; but the state suffers oppression if such as they, either individually or collectively, are permitted to rule. In this you think you are combating prejudice, but you are at war with nature...”

Throughout the 1950s, Kirk and his warnings of the dangers of an activist middle-class developed a small following; the most prominent of his proponents were William F. Buckley Jr. and Barry Goldwater. Most Republicans, though, considered him a crackpot.

But when the birth-control pill was legalized in 1961 and the Vietnam War heated up a few years later, those marginalized groups Kirk had warned his wealthy white male followers about began to rise up in protest.

Cool story, bro. Needs more dragons.
 
We just hurt our self's, When we fight for any one party to have ALL control.
Balance of power serves 70% of the nation best. ITS MESSY but government always has been.
ITS run by humans, and they can be greedy for money & power.
 
We just hurt our self's, When we fight for any one party to have ALL control.
Balance of power serves 70% of the nation best. ITS MESSY but government always has been.
ITS run by humans, and they can be greedy for money & power.

Because we have more than 2 parties, we frequently have "minority governments" - where the party with the most number of seats doesn't have a 50+% of the seats in Parliament. Our current government is 2 seats short of a majority, and will need help from one of the other 4 left wing parties to pass any legislation.

If the minority government proposes legislation which fails to pass, the government falls, and we have an election within 42 days. This minority government will be much safer than Trudeau's government because his min
she's all comfy cozy with her new master PM. I'm sure she's out grazing at this time like a good little sheep.

You mean the man who pledged to SERVE all Canadians. That guy???? The one who is currently working on his first budget, to be presented to the Canadian people next week???? That guy?
 
You mean the man who pledged to SERVE all Canadians. That guy???? The one who is currently working on his first budget, to be presented to the Canadian people next week???? That guy?
There’s the sheep telling the world that all Canadians!! You really are hypnotized
 
15th post
The founding premise of the modern conservative movement tracks back a generation before Stormer’s book to a Republican thought leader named Russell Kirk.

Kirk argued that the middle class was becoming a threat to America; without clearly defined classes and power structures — essentially without the morbidly rich in complete control of everything — he worried that society would devolve into chaos.

The opening chapter of his book was about Edmund Burke, the Irish conservative who wrote, in 1790, that hairdressers and candlemakers should not be allowed to run for political office or even to vote:

“The occupation of a hairdresser or of a working tallow-chandler cannot be a matter of honor to any person — to say nothing of a number of other more servile employments. Such descriptions of men ought not to suffer oppression from the state; but the state suffers oppression if such as they, either individually or collectively, are permitted to rule. In this you think you are combating prejudice, but you are at war with nature...”

Throughout the 1950s, Kirk and his warnings of the dangers of an activist middle-class developed a small following; the most prominent of his proponents were William F. Buckley Jr. and Barry Goldwater. Most Republicans, though, considered him a crackpot.

But when the birth-control pill was legalized in 1961 and the Vietnam War heated up a few years later, those marginalized groups Kirk had warned his wealthy white male followers about began to rise up in protest.



The democrat Party importing voters
 
The founding premise of the modern conservative movement tracks back a generation before Stormer’s book to a Republican thought leader named Russell Kirk.

Kirk argued that the middle class was becoming a threat to America; without clearly defined classes and power structures — essentially without the morbidly rich in complete control of everything — he worried that society would devolve into chaos.

The opening chapter of his book was about Edmund Burke, the Irish conservative who wrote, in 1790, that hairdressers and candlemakers should not be allowed to run for political office or even to vote:

“The occupation of a hairdresser or of a working tallow-chandler cannot be a matter of honor to any person — to say nothing of a number of other more servile employments. Such descriptions of men ought not to suffer oppression from the state; but the state suffers oppression if such as they, either individually or collectively, are permitted to rule. In this you think you are combating prejudice, but you are at war with nature...”

Throughout the 1950s, Kirk and his warnings of the dangers of an activist middle-class developed a small following; the most prominent of his proponents were William F. Buckley Jr. and Barry Goldwater. Most Republicans, though, considered him a crackpot.

But when the birth-control pill was legalized in 1961 and the Vietnam War heated up a few years later, those marginalized groups Kirk had warned his wealthy white male followers about began to rise up in protest.

 
I was a staunch critic of the GOP for decades because they were the party of the DC establishment and served the establishment very well. No one was more happy when GW Bush brought about an end to the GOP reign of terror and killed the party for the voter base. What did the democraps immediately do? They became the dedicated party of the DC establishment and went far beyond. This is why no one likes the current democrap party, they are all establishment shills. The people have to stop voting for these establishment politicians and sooner than later the existing politicians are going to have to address all the Big Money corruption in the government. Killing Citiziens United is an important first step.
 
The GOP used to be progressive and then they started worshiping at the alter of the God on the currency.

They were generally middle of the road.

The GOP was founded by, and generally worked for the wealthy bankasiess interests. Both Stephen Douglass and Abraham Lincoln were railroad lawyers.

Railroads and iron and steel interests and their Wall Street Allie’s do,instead the GOP well into the 20th Century.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom