Zone1 Behind The 60 Year Republican Plot To Destroy American Democracy

skews13

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
10,737
Reaction score
14,365
Points
2,415
The founding premise of the modern conservative movement tracks back a generation before Stormer’s book to a Republican thought leader named Russell Kirk.

Kirk argued that the middle class was becoming a threat to America; without clearly defined classes and power structures — essentially without the morbidly rich in complete control of everything — he worried that society would devolve into chaos.

The opening chapter of his book was about Edmund Burke, the Irish conservative who wrote, in 1790, that hairdressers and candlemakers should not be allowed to run for political office or even to vote:

“The occupation of a hairdresser or of a working tallow-chandler cannot be a matter of honor to any person — to say nothing of a number of other more servile employments. Such descriptions of men ought not to suffer oppression from the state; but the state suffers oppression if such as they, either individually or collectively, are permitted to rule. In this you think you are combating prejudice, but you are at war with nature...”

Throughout the 1950s, Kirk and his warnings of the dangers of an activist middle-class developed a small following; the most prominent of his proponents were William F. Buckley Jr. and Barry Goldwater. Most Republicans, though, considered him a crackpot.

But when the birth-control pill was legalized in 1961 and the Vietnam War heated up a few years later, those marginalized groups Kirk had warned his wealthy white male followers about began to rise up in protest.

 
How can you have a clean debate over this stupidity and blatant flame-,baiting?
Perfectly legitimate debate, based on actual books, and strategies by Republicans. A very well laid out set of historical facts by Hartmann, that are beyond any dispute.

Feel free to dispute any fact in the article, with any factual basis or facts, that show any of the information to be false or misconstrued.
 
rightwinger

An unfortunate history the present party cannot escape. As Hartmann points out in well researched history, using the information from their own writings.

The hardest part for them is having to defend it.

Much less debate it. But I'm open to debate any of them that wish to try.
 
How can you have a clean debate over this stupidity and blatant flame-,baiting?
‘The Republican/Conservative “solution” to the “crisis” these five movements represented was put into place in 1981 when Ronald Reagan was sworn into office: the explicit goal of the morbidly rich white men funding the so-called Reagan Revolution was to take the middle class down a peg to end the protests of the ’60s and ’70s, restore “social stability,” and increase corporate profitability.
[…]
Thus, Reagan massively cut taxes on rich people and raised taxes on working-class people 11 times. For example, he put income taxes on Social Security and unemployment payments, and put in a mechanism to track and tax tips income, all of which had previously been tax-free but were exclusively needed and used by middle-class people.
[…]
So, to save America from herself, Reagan gutted the American middle class, transferring over $50 trillion in wealth from working class people into the money bins of the morbidly rich.’

And Reagan was in fact successful in destroying the middle class.
 
Perfectly legitimate debate, based on actual books, and strategies by Republicans. A very well laid out set of historical facts by Hartmann, that are beyond any dispute.

Feel free to dispute any fact in the article, with any factual basis or facts, that show any of the information to be false or misconstrued.
Your linked article is behind a paywall.
I refuse to support a leftist propaganda hack website just to read their lies that you endorse.
Try starting with public available, no pay, and factual site to support your absurdities.
 
‘The Republican/Conservative “solution” to the “crisis” these five movements represented was put into place in 1981 when Ronald Reagan was sworn into office: the explicit goal of the morbidly rich white men funding the so-called Reagan Revolution was to take the middle class down a peg to end the protests of the ’60s and ’70s, restore “social stability,” and increase corporate profitability.
[…]
Thus, Reagan massively cut taxes on rich people and raised taxes on working-class people 11 times. For example, he put income taxes on Social Security and unemployment payments, and put in a mechanism to track and tax tips income, all of which had previously been tax-free but were exclusively needed and used by middle-class people.
[…]
So, to save America from herself, Reagan gutted the American middle class, transferring over $50 trillion in wealth from working class people into the money bins of the morbidly rich.’

And Reagan was in fact successful in destroying the middle class.
Reagan started the process of destroying unions.
Collective bargaining rights were whittled down. “Right to Work” meant right to low pay.

Since Reagan, salaries have been stagnant, pensions and health benefits have been eliminated and job security is nonexistent
 
What is kind of warped is when average working people get a rise in wages across the board, the wealthy cry about inflation. Is that to suppress wages? Telling us paying double time wages for overtime is wrong. 5 weeks paid vacation is too much. Social security is a pinning scheme. Entitlements are bankrupting america. Pensions are bad......all lies
 
Back
Top Bottom