You are some kind of stupid son. You didn't even read what I posted. The state Senate and its consultants. Who do you think these consultants are? Cyber Ninjas, company that led Arizona GOP election 'audit,' is shutting downHow is an audit illegal? You cannot answer, can you?
So, certifications of the election were stamped. Does that make them illegal too? What you see is evidence the election was fraudulent because of the laws clearly broken and you cannot handle it.
Because He Said So
- Thread starter Road Runner
- Start date
Cyber Ninjas, company that led Arizona GOP election 'audit,' is shutting down
Arizona election officials this week released a report rebutting almost every claim by Cyber Ninjas in its ballot review, NBC News reports.
You aren't mentally well; Rather than breaking the official chain of custody, the Arizona election officials should have either made paper copies of the ballots or scanned the ballots for viewing electronically. You can't bring in illegal Cyber Ninjas after the fact you idiot.How is an audit illegal? You cannot answer, can you?
So, certifications of the election were stamped. Does that make them illegal too? What you see is evidence the election was fraudulent because of the laws clearly broken and you cannot handle it.
Arizona Senate, Which Hired Cyber Ninjas, Now Desperately Seeking Its Election Records All this is the fault of Arizona State Republicans. It's their fuck up.How is an audit illegal? You cannot answer, can you?
So, certifications of the election were stamped. Does that make them illegal too? What you see is evidence the election was fraudulent because of the laws clearly broken and you cannot handle it.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
Dude, 2+2=4. It always will be. Whatever mistakes Arizona Republicans made or didn't make, is on them. Doesn't give them the legal authority to hire outside private help, to muddy the waters even more.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 10,910
- 7,195
- 938
Today, there are no challenges to the 2020 presidential election anywhere in the nation.
All fantasies have been exhausted in every legal venue.
Even the most fanatical politicians, prosecutors, media entertainers, and investigators have been thwarted by reality.
Every recount, audit, and court challenge failed to overcome the truth.
All illegal recourses to overthrow the election have also fizzled.
None of the multiple conspiracies that fester in the minds of the deluded could withstand evidentiary rigor and even remotely rise to the level of credibility.
Nor can the deluded understand why Trumpy lawyers', Trumpy pols', Trumpy prosecutors', and Trumpy investigators' attempts to foist the falsehoods on the nation have all been abandoned by them.
The dastardly, vast conspiracy was the complicity of 7,052,770 more Americans casting ballots for the winner instead of the loser whose unpopularity had been confirmed, consistently, throughout his four years.
Fifty states under both Republican and Democratic administrations certified the will of their electorates, and the Congress of the United States, under the auspices of the Vice President of the United States, respected the Constitution of the United States in officially recognizing the results:
All fantasies have been exhausted in every legal venue.
Even the most fanatical politicians, prosecutors, media entertainers, and investigators have been thwarted by reality.
Every recount, audit, and court challenge failed to overcome the truth.
All illegal recourses to overthrow the election have also fizzled.
None of the multiple conspiracies that fester in the minds of the deluded could withstand evidentiary rigor and even remotely rise to the level of credibility.
Nor can the deluded understand why Trumpy lawyers', Trumpy pols', Trumpy prosecutors', and Trumpy investigators' attempts to foist the falsehoods on the nation have all been abandoned by them.
The dastardly, vast conspiracy was the complicity of 7,052,770 more Americans casting ballots for the winner instead of the loser whose unpopularity had been confirmed, consistently, throughout his four years.
Fifty states under both Republican and Democratic administrations certified the will of their electorates, and the Congress of the United States, under the auspices of the Vice President of the United States, respected the Constitution of the United States in officially recognizing the results:
Biden: 306 Electoral Votes // Trump: 232 Electoral Votes
The paranoid fantasy of the dead-ender crackpots of Trumpery relentlessly metastasizes to engulf the legion of all those rabid Trumpy pom pom flailers, all of whom finally gave up their attempts to deny the American public their prerogative.
It changes everything. Once you bring in a private team of auditors illegally, all bets are off. It's game over for you. But you aren't smart enough to know that.
Awesome post. Too bad the Trump nincompoops will never accept reality.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 10,910
- 7,195
- 938
It is as if a crackpot conspiracy theory metastasized throughout the Land of Oz, and demented Munchkins were doggedly goose stepping along their Yellow Brick Road shrieking paeans of allegiance to the moldering Wicked Witch, incapable of accepting the incontrovertible evidence of her passing.
Who said one coming from outside private companies handling my votes were, when records were not preserved? https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1417796/download Republican election officials didn't preserve them in a way that outside audits would be valid. Therefore, they are illegal. Too bad you are not smart enough to understand that.
Last edited:
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
Huh? That's a stupid argument that says nothing, and proves even less. What have you got, a fork in your fucking head? I already posted the illegality of it through links. You're like a spin top who can't stop long enough to read what someone posted in order to keep up. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1417796/download Read the statutes you idiot, instead of spinning around like a dunce;
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
You saying the audits were illegal is and was a lie. Where is the word "illegal" used in your link? This is your second chance.Huh? That's a stupid argument that says nothing, and proves even less. What have you got, a fork in your fucking head? I already posted the illegality of it through links. You're like a spin top who can't stop long enough to read what someone posted in order to keep up. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1417796/download Read the statutes you idiot, instead of spinning around like a dunce;
Election audits are exceedingly rare. But the Department is concerned that some jurisdictions conducting them may be using, or proposing to use, procedures that risk violating the Civil Rights Act. The duty to retain and preserve election records necessarily requires that elections officials maintain the security and integrity of those records and their attendant chain of custody, so that a complete and 3 | Federal Law Constraints on Post-Election “Audits” U.S. Department of Justice uncompromised record of federal elections can be reliably accessed and used in federal law enforcement matters. Where election records leave the control of elections officials, the systems for maintaining the security, integrity and chain of custody of those records can easily be broken. Moreover, where elections records are no longer under the control of elections officials, this can lead to a significant risk of the records being lost, stolen, altered, compromised, or destroyed. This risk is exacerbated if the election records are given to private actors who have neither experience nor expertise in handling such records and who are unfamiliar with the obligations imposed by federal law.
Therefore, if the original election official who has custody of records covered by the Act hands over those election records to other officials (for example, to legislators or other officeholders) or the official turns over the records to private parties (such as companies that offer to conduct “forensic examinations”), the Department interprets the Act to require that “administrative procedures be in place giving election officers ultimate management authority over the retention and security of those election records, including the right to physically access” such records. Id. In other words, the obligation to retain and preserve election records remains intact regardless of who has physical possession of those records. Jurisdictions must ensure that if they conduct post-election ballot examinations, they also continue to comply with the retention and preservation requirements of Section 301. There are federal criminal penalties attached to willful failures to comply with the retention and preservation requirements of the Civil Rights Act. First, Section 301 itself makes it a federal crime for “[a]ny officer of election” or “custodian” of election records to willfully fail to comply with the retention and preservation requirements. 52 U.S.C. § 20701. Second, Section 302 provides that any “person, whether or not an officer of election or custodian, who willfully steals, destroys, conceals, mutilates, or alters any record or paper” covered by Section 301’s retention and preservation requirement is subject to federal criminal penalties. Id. § 20702. Violators of either section can face fines of up to $1000 and imprisonment of up to one year for each violation.
New Judge to Handle Cyber Ninjas Contempt of Court, Daily Fines | Bloomberg Government
A new judge will hear the case that resulted in daily fines against a company that was hired to audit votes cast in Arizona’s most populous county, according to court documents filed Wednesday.
about.bgov.com
In one lawsuit, Hannah found the company in contempt for failing to turn over public records and ordered the daily fine. In the second lawsuit, Judge Michael Kemp ordered CEO Doug Logan to appear for a deposition by Jan. 27 or risk sanctions and a civil arrest warrant. The people you are defending have violated the law. The people you are defending have violated the law.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
Election audits are exceedingly rare. But the Department is concerned that some jurisdictions conducting them may be using, or proposing to use, procedures that risk violating the Civil Rights Act. The duty to retain and preserve election records necessarily requires that elections officials maintain the security and integrity of those records and their attendant chain of custody, so that a complete and 3 | Federal Law Constraints on Post-Election “Audits” U.S. Department of Justice uncompromised record of federal elections can be reliably accessed and used in federal law enforcement matters. Where election records leave the control of elections officials, the systems for maintaining the security, integrity and chain of custody of those records can easily be broken. Moreover, where elections records are no longer under the control of elections officials, this can lead to a significant risk of the records being lost, stolen, altered, compromised, or destroyed. This risk is exacerbated if the election records are given to private actors who have neither experience nor expertise in handling such records and who are unfamiliar with the obligations imposed by federal law.
Therefore, if the original election official who has custody of records covered by the Act hands over those election records to other officials (for example, to legislators or other officeholders) or the official turns over the records to private parties (such as companies that offer to conduct “forensic examinations”), the Department interprets the Act to require that “administrative procedures be in place giving election officers ultimate management authority over the retention and security of those election records, including the right to physically access” such records. Id. In other words, the obligation to retain and preserve election records remains intact regardless of who has physical possession of those records. Jurisdictions must ensure that if they conduct post-election ballot examinations, they also continue to comply with the retention and preservation requirements of Section 301. There are federal criminal penalties attached to willful failures to comply with the retention and preservation requirements of the Civil Rights Act. First, Section 301 itself makes it a federal crime for “[a]ny officer of election” or “custodian” of election records to willfully fail to comply with the retention and preservation requirements. 52 U.S.C. § 20701. Second, Section 302 provides that any “person, whether or not an officer of election or custodian, who willfully steals, destroys, conceals, mutilates, or alters any record or paper” covered by Section 301’s retention and preservation requirement is subject to federal criminal penalties. Id. § 20702. Violators of either section can face fines of up to $1000 and imprisonment of up to one year for each violation.
New Judge to Handle Cyber Ninjas Contempt of Court, Daily Fines | Bloomberg Government
A new judge will hear the case that resulted in daily fines against a company that was hired to audit votes cast in Arizona’s most populous county, according to court documents filed Wednesday.
In one lawsuit, Hannah found the company in contempt for failing to turn over public records and ordered the daily fine. In the second lawsuit, Judge Michael Kemp ordered CEO Doug Logan to appear for a deposition by Jan. 27 or risk sanctions and a civil arrest warrant. The people you are defending have violated the law.
So? Has the DOJ proven any of those things happened? Have there been any arrests? You are blowing smoke because only corruption, not legality, stands in the way of the truth. In Nov. AZ. will elect the people who will get the evidence into a courtroom and Joe can kiss his ass goodbye.
In one lawsuit, Hannah found the company in contempt for failing to turn over public records and ordered the daily fine. They were fined.
The second one is ongoing; Judge Michael Kemp ordered CEO Doug Logan to appear for a deposition by Jan. 27 or risk sanctions and a civil arrest warrant. The people you are defending have violated the law.
Similar threads
