Beatle Bashes Bush at White House

[Toro]

Bashing Bush is so 2005.

 

[Skull Pilot]

The beatles sucked in the 60s collectively and they sucked individually.


"Yeah Yeah yeah, Love me do"

Pop slop shitty music.

yea they were pretty bad.....over a billion in record sales.....name another group that even comes close............

SO because a bunch of idiotic swooning teeny boppers bought their albums they are somehow musical prodigies?

Their music sucked.

 

[geauxtohell]

Who gives a shit what celebrities think anyway? I mean seriously when did people turn to a Beatle for political opinion?

However, that being said, is it really appropriate for a guest of the White House to bashing a former resident of said WH? I think not. it was poor taste.

although the k00ks consider them experts!!

Do you listen to Hannity or Limbaugh? They are entertainers. What makes them experets? They have no degree or special life experience in politics.

 

[Angelhair]

Love the way some naturalized citizens come here and make it their 'job' to rag on our presidents - sometimes past and present. I guess the freedom of speech makes them somewhat nuts!

 

[rightwinger]

McCartney aside, you would be hard pressed to find anyone outside the US who has a favorable opinion of Bush. It got Obama a Nobel Prize

 

[Toro]

McCartney aside, you would be hard pressed to find anyone outside the US who has a favorable opinion of Bush. It got Obama a Nobel Prize

Amen to that. Obama got the Prize simply because he wasn't Bush. Not exactly a worthy reason, but the bar was set awfully low.

 

[rightwinger]

McCartney aside, you would be hard pressed to find anyone outside the US who has a favorable opinion of Bush. It got Obama a Nobel Prize

Amen to that. Obama got the Prize simply because he wasn't Bush. Not exactly a worthy reason, but the bar was set awfully low.

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

 

[Skull Pilot]

McCartney aside, you would be hard pressed to find anyone outside the US who has a favorable opinion of Bush. It got Obama a Nobel Prize

Amen to that. Obama got the Prize simply because he wasn't Bush. Not exactly a worthy reason, but the bar was set awfully low.

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

Excuse me but what European country has had a black president of Prime minister in the last two centuries?

And we're the racists?

 

[rightwinger]

Amen to that. Obama got the Prize simply because he wasn't Bush. Not exactly a worthy reason, but the bar was set awfully low.

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

Excuse me but what European country has had a black president of Prime minister in the last two centuries?

And we're the racists?

Thats the best you can come up with? Europe does not have the percentage of blacks that the US does nor the history of violence and officially sanctioned discrimination. Our racist past is part of our history. Obama is a significant message that we have moved past that history.

 

[Harry Dresden]

SO because a bunch of idiotic swooning teeny boppers bought their albums they are somehow musical prodigies?

Their music sucked.

thats just your opinion Skull,you dont like them......and it takes more than just swooning teeny boppers to do the sales..... on this you are no doubt an extreme minority....when they came out i liked the Animals,Kinks and Stones much more than them.....but you cant take away what they accomplished.....i cant stand Michael Jackson.....but in the world of the music video.....that guy accomplished allot.....and should be recognized for it....why dont you tell us who you think is a greater sixties band than the Beatles.....i would like to know...

 

[Harry Dresden]

McCartney aside, you would be hard pressed to find anyone outside the US who has a favorable opinion of Bush. It got Obama a Nobel Prize

come on Rw....that prize was kinda not warrented.....if they would have waited until his term is up and he was succesful at bringing peace somewhere.....then he deserved it.....he hasnt brought peace to Iraq,Afghanistan..... Iran aint kissing the guy.....NKorea aint kissing the guy.....peace with the Israelie/Palistinian thing?.....he hasnt done shit for Africa....hell this country is even more divided than before he took over....WHERE has he gotten some piece besides his wife?....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

.....at least Mandela and King brought people together and actually accomplished something Rw...just giving a peace prize to a guy because he is NOT Bush and because he is BLACK.....thats not saying much for the prize itself OR those who actually deserved it that year....but of course they did give it to Arafat that one year....so it dont mean much anymore anyway...

 

[sangha]

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

.....at least Mandela and King brought people together and actually accomplished something Rw...just giving a peace prize to a guy because he is NOT Bush and because he is BLACK.....thats not saying much for the prize itself OR those who actually deserved it that year....but of course they did give it to Arafat that one year....so it dont mean much anymore anyway...

It's obvious that conservatives are still bitter over Obama's Nobel prize. They can't stop talking about. It's in several threads that have nothing to do with Obama.

The wingnuts are obsessed

 

[Stephanie]

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

.....at least Mandela and King brought people together and actually accomplished something Rw...just giving a peace prize to a guy because he is NOT Bush and because he is BLACK.....thats not saying much for the prize itself OR those who actually deserved it that year....but of course they did give it to Arafat that one year....so it dont mean much anymore anyway...

It's obvious that conservatives are still bitter over Obama's Nobel prize. They can't stop talking about. It's in several threads that have nothing to do with Obama.

The wingnuts are obsessed

well heck, nothing like being awarded a peace prize for doing absolutely JACK SHIT.
and by the way, where is all that peace in the world since the Messiah Obama was suppose to bring it by just "being elected".

 

[rightwinger]

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

.....at least Mandela and King brought people together and actually accomplished something Rw...just giving a peace prize to a guy because he is NOT Bush and because he is BLACK.....thats not saying much for the prize itself OR those who actually deserved it that year....but of course they did give it to Arafat that one year....so it dont mean much anymore anyway...

at least Mandela and King brought people together

When King won the Nobel in 1964 conservatives howled about what a travesty it was. In their view he was tearing America apart at the seams. Mandella had a similar response that he was nothing but a criminal.

Obama's election in 2008 was a historic accomplishment for not just the US but the world. For the Nobel Prize committee to acknowledge it will eventually be considered as a no brainer

 

[Stephanie]

Obama won the Nobel Prize for two reasons:

First because he was not Bush: Bush terrified the world with his simplistic foreign policy, single minded solutions, unwillingness to use diplomacy, lies, torture...... In 2009, Obama laid the groundwork for open diplomatic relations, listening to the concerns of other nations and willingness to cooperate as part of the global community rather than dictate.

Secondly, Obama won because he was black. In itself, being black is not much of an accomplishment. But being black in a country with the racial history of the US and rising to the ranks of the presidency is an accomplishment of historical significance. If you look at the line of black Nobel Prize winners......Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandella and now Obama it shows a recognition by the Nobel committee of the struggles of blacks in obtaining equal treatment

.....at least Mandela and King brought people together and actually accomplished something Rw...just giving a peace prize to a guy because he is NOT Bush and because he is BLACK.....thats not saying much for the prize itself OR those who actually deserved it that year....but of course they did give it to Arafat that one year....so it dont mean much anymore anyway...

at least Mandela and King brought people together

When King won the Nobel in 1964 conservatives howled about what a travesty it was. In their view he was tearing America apart at the seams. Mandella had a similar response that he was nothing but a criminal.

Obama's election in 2008 was a historic accomplishment for not just the US but the world. Fot the Nobel Prize committee to acknowledge it will eventually be considered as a no brainer

OMG. his being elected was was a historic accomplishment for the WORLD.
good gawd.

 

[rightwinger]

.....at least Mandela and King brought people together and actually accomplished something Rw...just giving a peace prize to a guy because he is NOT Bush and because he is BLACK.....thats not saying much for the prize itself OR those who actually deserved it that year....but of course they did give it to Arafat that one year....so it dont mean much anymore anyway...

at least Mandela and King brought people together

When King won the Nobel in 1964 conservatives howled about what a travesty it was. In their view he was tearing America apart at the seams. Mandella had a similar response that he was nothing but a criminal.

Obama's election in 2008 was a historic accomplishment for not just the US but the world. Fot the Nobel Prize committee to acknowledge it will eventually be considered as a no brainer

OMG. his being elected was was a historic accomplishment for the WORLD.
good gawd.

Absolutely it was.....did you miss the global news coverage that day? It was a celebrated event not just for the sake of the US, but the world as a whole.

To paraphrase Joe Biden......

A Black Man being elected as President of the United States is a Big ******* Deal

 

[rightwinger]

Abroad, Obama's victory spurs joy - Los Angeles Times

In country after country, elation over Obama's victory was palpable, the hunger for a change of American leadership as strong outside the U.S. as in it. And there was wonderment that, in the world's most powerful democracy, a man with African roots and the middle name Hussein, an upstart fighter who took on political heavyweights, could capture the highest office in the land.

 

[sitarro]

Funny is funny dude.

Get a sense of humor.

Knowing conservative goof the way I do (at least the quirkiest of them) this will snowball into a hatred of Wings (first) and then the Beatles.

Pretty soon they will be setting Beatles albums on fire and driving over them with tractors.

Kind of like they did with the Dixie Chicks. I mean, that Natalie Maines was just so wrong and un-American for daring to criticize George W. Bush.

She was so wrong too. Iraq turned out to be sooooo justified.

/sarcasm

Maybe more liberal entertainers should speak up more often, they seem to get the issues better than the conservatives.

I already hate Wings. and right now I think Lennon's "How do you sleep" is the greatest song ever written.

Really? The greatest song ever written? We get that you hate McCartney but to elevate Lennon to a higher status than he deserves is a joke. Lennon kind of did his goofy little political stunts with that asshole Ono and that is suppose to make him so very deep....... that's the joke. Lennon was truly nothing without McCartney, he was always very one dimensional.

 

[sitarro]

When King won the Nobel in 1964 conservatives howled about what a travesty it was. In their view he was tearing America apart at the seams. Mandella had a similar response that he was nothing but a criminal.

Obama's election in 2008 was a historic accomplishment for not just the US but the world. Fot the Nobel Prize committee to acknowledge it will eventually be considered as a no brainer

OMG. his being elected was was a historic accomplishment for the WORLD.
good gawd.

Absolutely it was.....did you miss the global news coverage that day? It was a celebrated event not just for the sake of the US, but the world as a whole.

To paraphrase Joe Biden......

A Black Man being elected as President of the United States is a Big ******* Deal

"Paraphrasing" Joe Biden.......... that is really pathetic. Only imbeciles around the world were impressed with the ripoff purchase of the Presidency by George Soros for that little African boy Obama.