BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and evven tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

Sayaras

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2023
Messages
4,597
Reaction score
2,631
Points
928
Is she naiive?




BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and evven tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.
Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025.

Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

The begins with repeating what "Hamas official" argues why they can't agree to ceasefire Netanyahu agreed to [beacuse they want a guarantee of not resuming the war after 60 days], presents them as of equal and normal side in the war.

She interviews David Satterfield of the Baker Institute.

She asks Satterfield about UN objecting the US/Israel GHF and his opinion about it.

He replies that we should encourage any food entering.

[She misses the point of playing politics while they all say, the situation there is desperate].

Then she tries something else.

She plays the rhetoric and hyperbolic terminology (such as the G word) to see maybe he will budge. And asks if the US can force Netanyahu...

But Satterfield tells her "let's remind your listeners" whose fault it is there's no ceasefire in Gaza: "that lies exclusively with Hamas." They massacred Jews on Oct 7 and have said they will do it again and again. And reminds Hamas' stubbornness past too - such as late 2023; their goal of "claiming victory." That steps against / forcing Israel will only encourage Hamas.

Then Perry tries another thing. She plays Hamas argument and arguing as "not having a choice."

Satterfield: I would not wish to comment upon a terrorist organization...

a9640914af65e134520f43f5f4e27b28c3a23ce8.jpg

4446fdc7e08c5655611b08c01ab931fc63d1563e.jpg

8722d25c6543f779e5d249962005ff02ef680eae.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think I agree with the author of that "wiki facts." But the writing is so horrible, it's hard to follow.

It sounds like some of the socks here whose puppet masters use deliberately bad English since their unintentional bad English would be spotted in a sock.
 
I think I agree with the author of that "wiki facts." But the writing is so horrible, it's hard to follow.
They don't have the best writing skills [they seem to be of a very young age] but they are right on the dot/s.
And about sockpuppets on Wikipedia... hamas-nick Nableezy seems to be 'in the thick of it.'
 
Last edited:
Is she naiive?




BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and evven tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.
Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025.

Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

The begins with repeating what "Hamas official" argues why they can't agree to ceasefire Netanyahu agreed to [beacuse they want a guarantee of not resuming the war after 60 days], presents them as of equal and normal side in the war.

She interviews David Satterfield of the Baker Institute.

She asks Satterfield about UN objecting the US/Israel GHF and his opinion about it.

He replies that we should encourage any food entering.

[She misses the point of playing politics while they all say, the situation there is desperate].

Then she tries something else.

She plays the rhetoric and hyperbolic terminology (such as the G word) to see maybe he will budge. And asks if the US can force Netanyahu...

But Satterfield tells her "let's remind your listeners" whose fault it is there's no ceasefire in Gaza: "that lies exclusively with Hamas." They massacred Jews on Oct 7 and have said they will do it again and again. And reminds Hamas' stubbornness past too - such as late 2023; their goal of "claiming victory." That steps against / forcing Israel will only encourage Hamas.

Then Perry tries another thing. She plays Hamas argument and arguing as "not having a choice."

Satterfield: I would not wish to comment upon a terrorist organization...

a9640914af65e134520f43f5f4e27b28c3a23ce8.jpg

4446fdc7e08c5655611b08c01ab931fc63d1563e.jpg

8722d25c6543f779e5d249962005ff02ef680eae.jpg
I think Perry is not too smart. Then again, BBC is terribly biased.
 
This is Europes direction. what it means for the West is anyones guess but I doubt it has a happy ending.
Yup Eurabia and Londonistan..
And this is BBC America, AKA BBC exporting its propaganda right here in the US on PBS stations
 
Is she naiive?



Over here the BBC surprisingly has become " Good and Moral" and does everything but directly call Israel corrupt , disgusting and Evil .

This suggests that our Intel agencies have advised Sir Queer Harmer and his abject government of the need to distance themselves from the Nazisrael Genocide .

In line with Trumpfys acting .
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom