BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and evven tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

[Sayaras]

Is she naiive?

---

BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and evven tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and even tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back

Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025. Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is...

on-wiki-facts.blogspot.com

Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025.

Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

The begins with repeating what "Hamas official" argues why they can't agree to ceasefire Netanyahu agreed to [beacuse they want a guarantee of not resuming the war after 60 days], presents them as of equal and normal side in the war.

She interviews David Satterfield of the Baker Institute.

She asks Satterfield about UN objecting the US/Israel GHF and his opinion about it.

He replies that we should encourage any food entering.

[She misses the point of playing politics while they all say, the situation there is desperate].

Then she tries something else.

She plays the rhetoric and hyperbolic terminology (such as the G word) to see maybe he will budge. And asks if the US can force Netanyahu...

But Satterfield tells her "let's remind your listeners" whose fault it is there's no ceasefire in Gaza: "that lies exclusively with Hamas." They massacred Jews on Oct 7 and have said they will do it again and again. And reminds Hamas' stubbornness past too - such as late 2023; their goal of "claiming victory." That steps against / forcing Israel will only encourage Hamas.

Then Perry tries another thing. She plays Hamas argument and arguing as "not having a choice."

Satterfield: I would not wish to comment upon a terrorist organization...

 

[Seymour Flops]

I think I agree with the author of that "wiki facts." But the writing is so horrible, it's hard to follow.

It sounds like some of the socks here whose puppet masters use deliberately bad English since their unintentional bad English would be spotted in a sock.

 

[Sayaras]

I think I agree with the author of that "wiki facts." But the writing is so horrible, it's hard to follow.

They don't have the best writing skills [they seem to be of a very young age] but they are right on the dot/s.
And about sockpuppets on Wikipedia... hamas-nick Nableezy seems to be 'in the thick of it.'

 

[Pastelli]

Is she naiive?

---

BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and evven tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and even tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back

Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025. Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is...

on-wiki-facts.blogspot.com

Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025.

Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

The begins with repeating what "Hamas official" argues why they can't agree to ceasefire Netanyahu agreed to [beacuse they want a guarantee of not resuming the war after 60 days], presents them as of equal and normal side in the war.

She interviews David Satterfield of the Baker Institute.

She asks Satterfield about UN objecting the US/Israel GHF and his opinion about it.

He replies that we should encourage any food entering.

[She misses the point of playing politics while they all say, the situation there is desperate].

Then she tries something else.

She plays the rhetoric and hyperbolic terminology (such as the G word) to see maybe he will budge. And asks if the US can force Netanyahu...

But Satterfield tells her "let's remind your listeners" whose fault it is there's no ceasefire in Gaza: "that lies exclusively with Hamas." They massacred Jews on Oct 7 and have said they will do it again and again. And reminds Hamas' stubbornness past too - such as late 2023; their goal of "claiming victory." That steps against / forcing Israel will only encourage Hamas.

Then Perry tries another thing. She plays Hamas argument and arguing as "not having a choice."

Satterfield: I would not wish to comment upon a terrorist organization...

I think Perry is not too smart. Then again, BBC is terribly biased.

 

[shockedcanadian]

This is Europes direction. what it means for the West is anyones guess but I doubt it has a happy ending.

 

[Sayaras]

This is Europes direction. what it means for the West is anyones guess but I doubt it has a happy ending.

Yup Eurabia and Londonistan..
And this is BBC America, AKA BBC exporting its propaganda right here in the US on PBS stations

 

[luiza]

Is she naiive?

---

Over here the BBC surprisingly has become " Good and Moral" and does everything but directly call Israel corrupt , disgusting and Evil .

This suggests that our Intel agencies have advised Sir Queer Harmer and his abject government of the need to distance themselves from the Nazisrael Genocide .

In line with Trumpfys acting .

 

[Rigby5]

Is she naiive?

---

BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and evven tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

BBC News America's anchor advocates for Hamas and even tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back

Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025. Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is...

on-wiki-facts.blogspot.com

Caitríona Perry anchoring BBC News America, May 29, 2025.

Perry advocates for Hamas and tries the Pallyweid drama language but for once, is pushed back.

The begins with repeating what "Hamas official" argues why they can't agree to ceasefire Netanyahu agreed to [beacuse they want a guarantee of not resuming the war after 60 days], presents them as of equal and normal side in the war.

She interviews David Satterfield of the Baker Institute.

She asks Satterfield about UN objecting the US/Israel GHF and his opinion about it.

He replies that we should encourage any food entering.

[She misses the point of playing politics while they all say, the situation there is desperate].

Then she tries something else.

She plays the rhetoric and hyperbolic terminology (such as the G word) to see maybe he will budge. And asks if the US can force Netanyahu...

But Satterfield tells her "let's remind your listeners" whose fault it is there's no ceasefire in Gaza: "that lies exclusively with Hamas." They massacred Jews on Oct 7 and have said they will do it again and again. And reminds Hamas' stubbornness past too - such as late 2023; their goal of "claiming victory." That steps against / forcing Israel will only encourage Hamas.

Then Perry tries another thing. She plays Hamas argument and arguing as "not having a choice."

Satterfield: I would not wish to comment upon a terrorist organization...

Satterfield is an obvious liar because it trivially obvious who is at fault.
Menachem Begin deliberately blew up the British peacekeeper in the King David hotel in 1946.
The only reason to do that is so they could not prevent the genocide of Irgun, Lehi, and Stern from massacring hundreds of native villages like Deir Yassin.

The only possible purpose for the illegal Israeli blockade of international waters to Palestine, has to be genocide.
There is no other possible purpose.

 

[Rigby5]

I think Perry is not too smart. Then again, BBC is terribly biased.

Sure, according to you, the British are going to be biased in favor of the native Palestinian natives?
Not very likely.
You are the one with obvious professional bias.
The ones with all the weapons who have done all the murdering, are the Zionists.
And that is easily proven going back to 1946 when they started the war by blowing up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel.

 

[Rigby5]

This is Europes direction. what it means for the West is anyones guess but I doubt it has a happy ending.

The only "happy ending" would be is the millions of native Palestinians that Israel illegally prevents their RIGHT OF RETURN, would be allowed back into their homes in Palestine.
And the 6 million Israelis who never paid for the homes they illegally took, should be either made to pay or be evicted.

 

[Rigby5]

Yup Eurabia and Londonistan..
And this is BBC America, AKA BBC exporting its propaganda right here in the US on PBS stations

Oh right, its a conspiracy of all those sources who are not for profit.
That obviously is a total lie.
And we all know the truth since it clearly was the Zionists who blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel, in order to start the genocide.