Kruska
Diamond Member
This isn't about Ukraine being in the right or Russia, or who started or who caused this ridiculous war - which kind of puts you out of Balance.Whatever symbolic or military / political significance the battle of Bakhmut’s may have … it is not comparable to Stalingrad. Calling Zelensky “the Goebbels Scholar” doesn’t make him a Nazi either.
Krushka can talk up his crazy parallels all he wants — but independent and sovereign Ukraine, even aided by NATO and even under hard Ukrainian nationalist leadership, is not comparable to Hitler and his fascist / imperialist alliance seeking “lebensraum,” genocide against Slavic people & Jews, world domination, etc.
Ukraine did not invade deep into Russia seeking to destroy it. Just the opposite. However much we may regret that this war broke out, or assign “historical blame” to one side or another (including the U.S.), and want to encourage peace, it is clear that a significant Russian defeat of its invasion is necessary, and has to a large extent already occurred. Russia’s desire to “un-make” Ukraine completely or put it back totally under its political control is impossible, and would be disastrous if it were to succeed.
Listen to the ex-Russian president openly declare the nationalist Kiev regime must cease to exist:
Kiev regime must cease to exist – ex-Russian president
P.S. By the way, Kruska , the American English term for the old class of aristocratic and princely landlords (who no longer exist) is, I believe, “Boyars.”
This was about comparing the failures and tactical similarities between Bachmut and Stalingrad - and both (off-course you don't like the comparison) had an extreme impact onto the future of that time Nazi Germany and now Ukraine - losses that can't be replaced at ease or even at all - and can't be hidden from the Ukrainian public. And further gives proof of the inability of the Goebbels scholar in regards to military issues. And as such the total failure of this Ukraine government and the artificial Ukraine construct itself.
Anyone who is familiar with Czarist Russia's history knows that the term Bojar (бояре) or (боляри) derives from that area and is independent from what American or English might have called their nobility - especially with America that never had a ruling nobility class. And the ages old English 13th century version of Boyar comes from the French Boyard.
BTW - you write like you need friends to support you - uh...guys please help me... this Kruska... - you are just a silly and pathetic person.