Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 54,242
- 16,467
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #241
The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud
Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...www.yahoo.com
More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
Look it up.
So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?
Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.
LOL
That's going nowhere. There's nothing unconstitutional about Act77
I'm glad you skipped over the other stuff.
How the States may have violated the Federal and State Constitutions?
Feel stupid yet?
One has to be smart to feel stupid...Faun doesn't know the difference....
Or, maybe the argument you read in a fortune cookie at lunch isn't as useful as say, the actual election results.
Or Barr confirming that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
No county votes over 99% for one party and Barr is as scared of BLM as anyone else, including myself.
And who says that any county votes over 99% for one party?
Was it the rambling conspiracy theorist from youtube? It was the rambling conspiracy theorist from youtube.