Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Deregulating Wall Street, tearing down the barrier between investment and commercial banks, ending Glass-Steagall, were the primary contributing factors in the financial meltdown of 2008. The problem with regulations is that people with lots of money can hire lobbyists and lawyers to make those regulations to suit their own needs. They have the power to create all the conditions to benefit themselves at the expense of everyone else.I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismNothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
Its not about that, were not libs, we dont want to be given shit and treated like children. I just want him to stop regulation.and build a wall.......anything else is gravy.
I think you mean "we're", the wall will never happen, regulation will do what it does now, protect the substantial people and corporate power/wealth at the expense of society at large, and really now; Trump treated you like children and you loved it.
Nah he didnt. So you admit regulation is.for crony capitalism and not good for us? Thats new, welcome aboard!
And the wall will happen, just another panick by you guys when it goes up. why are you so opposed to it?
Regulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismNothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
Its not about that, were not libs, we dont want to be given shit and treated like children. I just want him to stop regulation.and build a wall.......anything else is gravy.
I think you mean "we're", the wall will never happen, regulation will do what it does now, protect the substantial people and corporate power/wealth at the expense of society at large, and really now; Trump treated you like children and you loved it.
Nah he didnt. So you admit regulation is.for crony capitalism and not good for us? Thats new, welcome aboard!
And the wall will happen, just another panick by you guys when it goes up. why are you so opposed to it?
Regulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismIts not about that, were not libs, we dont want to be given shit and treated like children. I just want him to stop regulation.and build a wall.......anything else is gravy.
I think you mean "we're", the wall will never happen, regulation will do what it does now, protect the substantial people and corporate power/wealth at the expense of society at large, and really now; Trump treated you like children and you loved it.
Nah he didnt. So you admit regulation is.for crony capitalism and not good for us? Thats new, welcome aboard!
And the wall will happen, just another panick by you guys when it goes up. why are you so opposed to it?
Regulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
You're as nuts as Don is on this wall biz, watch. Yeah, we agree, regulations and the struggle over them are pretty much corporate power asserting its influence over the unsubstantial people and to the detriment of society at large. The very last thing the "job creator" class wants in this society is a level playing field.
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismIts not about that, were not libs, we dont want to be given shit and treated like children. I just want him to stop regulation.and build a wall.......anything else is gravy.
I think you mean "we're", the wall will never happen, regulation will do what it does now, protect the substantial people and corporate power/wealth at the expense of society at large, and really now; Trump treated you like children and you loved it.
Nah he didnt. So you admit regulation is.for crony capitalism and not good for us? Thats new, welcome aboard!
And the wall will happen, just another panick by you guys when it goes up. why are you so opposed to it?
Regulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
When do you think that will happen? After four years, will you still be saying that?
Americans are generally very susceptible to advertising , so it isn't too surprising to see people respond favorably to sophisticated marketing techniques and name recognition. Having Hilary Clinton as an opponent helps too.I think it's important to remember that the Presidency of Donald Trump is largely a rejection of a globalist economic and political agenda. People don't like the idea of multi national corporations controlling our future. Let's hope Trump means at least part of what he says he means.Frank was House Banking committee chairperson with oversight responsibility for Fannie Mae during the democrat majority in the 2nd half of Bush's 2nd term. Frank told Americans that Fannie was solvent and doing fine when it was obviously on the verge of collapse. Either Frank was a fool or he set up the Fannie debacle as the biggest October surprise in history. Unfortunately the media never asked him what the hell he was talking about and of course democrats used the collapse for political gain.
Nothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismI think you mean "we're", the wall will never happen, regulation will do what it does now, protect the substantial people and corporate power/wealth at the expense of society at large, and really now; Trump treated you like children and you loved it.
Nah he didnt. So you admit regulation is.for crony capitalism and not good for us? Thats new, welcome aboard!
And the wall will happen, just another panick by you guys when it goes up. why are you so opposed to it?
Regulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
When do you think that will happen? After four years, will you still be saying that?
What the wall?
Literally.
Mod Note: Constructive Anarchy --- Rules require that you include a brief summary in the Opening Post for the scope of the discussion. This prevents web-bots and gives moderators and members an idea of what will be considered "on-topic" for discussion.. Thx.....
Americans are generally very susceptible to advertising , so it isn't too surprising to see people respond favorably to sophisticated marketing techniques and name recognition. Having Hilary Clinton as an opponent helps too.I think it's important to remember that the Presidency of Donald Trump is largely a rejection of a globalist economic and political agenda. People don't like the idea of multi national corporations controlling our future. Let's hope Trump means at least part of what he says he means.Frank was House Banking committee chairperson with oversight responsibility for Fannie Mae during the democrat majority in the 2nd half of Bush's 2nd term. Frank told Americans that Fannie was solvent and doing fine when it was obviously on the verge of collapse. Either Frank was a fool or he set up the Fannie debacle as the biggest October surprise in history. Unfortunately the media never asked him what the hell he was talking about and of course democrats used the collapse for political gain.
Nothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
Hilary was terrible, hopefully the dems figure it out.
But the posr about advertising is ironic since the dems have hollywood.and.the artistic community, but still need the Supreme Court to pass their laws.
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismNah he didnt. So you admit regulation is.for crony capitalism and not good for us? Thats new, welcome aboard!
And the wall will happen, just another panick by you guys when it goes up. why are you so opposed to it?
Regulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
When do you think that will happen? After four years, will you still be saying that?
What the wall?
Of course, the wall. Will you just treat it like all your conspiracy theories, and make up some justification each time it just doesn't happen? Is there a point where you will admit it's just not happening? 1 year, 2 years, after Trump is no longer president?
Keep thinking that, Hillary was great!!!!Americans are generally very susceptible to advertising , so it isn't too surprising to see people respond favorably to sophisticated marketing techniques and name recognition. Having Hilary Clinton as an opponent helps too.I think it's important to remember that the Presidency of Donald Trump is largely a rejection of a globalist economic and political agenda. People don't like the idea of multi national corporations controlling our future. Let's hope Trump means at least part of what he says he means.Frank was House Banking committee chairperson with oversight responsibility for Fannie Mae during the democrat majority in the 2nd half of Bush's 2nd term. Frank told Americans that Fannie was solvent and doing fine when it was obviously on the verge of collapse. Either Frank was a fool or he set up the Fannie debacle as the biggest October surprise in history. Unfortunately the media never asked him what the hell he was talking about and of course democrats used the collapse for political gain.
Nothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
Hilary was terrible, hopefully the dems figure it out.
But the posr about advertising is ironic since the dems have hollywood.and.the artistic community, but still need the Supreme Court to pass their laws.
Hillary got 2.65 million more votes than Trump did. The voters did't think she was terrible.
Literally.
Mod Note: Constructive Anarchy --- Rules require that you include a brief summary in the Opening Post for the scope of the discussion. This prevents web-bots and gives moderators and members an idea of what will be considered "on-topic" for discussion.. Thx.....
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismRegulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
When do you think that will happen? After four years, will you still be saying that?
What the wall?
Of course, the wall. Will you just treat it like all your conspiracy theories, and make up some justification each time it just doesn't happen? Is there a point where you will admit it's just not happening? 1 year, 2 years, after Trump is no longer president?
So why wont it be built? Is this like Trump couldnt possibly win the Presidency?
Frank was House Banking committee chairperson with oversight responsibility for Fannie Mae during the democrat majority in the 2nd half of Bush's 2nd term. Frank told Americans that Fannie was solvent and doing fine when it was obviously on the verge of collapse. Either Frank was a fool or he set up the Fannie debacle as the biggest October surprise in history. Unfortunately the media never asked him what the hell he was talking about and of course democrats used the collapse for political gain.
And Trump won with less votes than it took for Romney to lose. I wonder what happened there? Where did the voters go?Americans are generally very susceptible to advertising , so it isn't too surprising to see people respond favorably to sophisticated marketing techniques and name recognition. Having Hilary Clinton as an opponent helps too.I think it's important to remember that the Presidency of Donald Trump is largely a rejection of a globalist economic and political agenda. People don't like the idea of multi national corporations controlling our future. Let's hope Trump means at least part of what he says he means.Frank was House Banking committee chairperson with oversight responsibility for Fannie Mae during the democrat majority in the 2nd half of Bush's 2nd term. Frank told Americans that Fannie was solvent and doing fine when it was obviously on the verge of collapse. Either Frank was a fool or he set up the Fannie debacle as the biggest October surprise in history. Unfortunately the media never asked him what the hell he was talking about and of course democrats used the collapse for political gain.
Nothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
Hilary was terrible, hopefully the dems figure it out.
But the posr about advertising is ironic since the dems have hollywood.and.the artistic community, but still need the Supreme Court to pass their laws.
Hillary got 2.65 million more votes than Trump did. The voters did't think she was terrible.
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialism
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
When do you think that will happen? After four years, will you still be saying that?
What the wall?
Of course, the wall. Will you just treat it like all your conspiracy theories, and make up some justification each time it just doesn't happen? Is there a point where you will admit it's just not happening? 1 year, 2 years, after Trump is no longer president?
So why wont it be built? Is this like Trump couldnt possibly win the Presidency?
Unless you have been in a cave, or only listen to fox and other fake news sites, you have heard most of the reasons it will never be built.
Frank was House Banking committee chairperson with oversight responsibility for Fannie Mae during the democrat majority in the 2nd half of Bush's 2nd term. Frank told Americans that Fannie was solvent and doing fine when it was obviously on the verge of collapse. Either Frank was a fool or he set up the Fannie debacle as the biggest October surprise in history. Unfortunately the media never asked him what the hell he was talking about and of course democrats used the collapse for political gain.
The housing meltdown was already underway before Barney Frank was head of any banking committee
When do you think that will happen? After four years, will you still be saying that?
What the wall?
Of course, the wall. Will you just treat it like all your conspiracy theories, and make up some justification each time it just doesn't happen? Is there a point where you will admit it's just not happening? 1 year, 2 years, after Trump is no longer president?
So why wont it be built? Is this like Trump couldnt possibly win the Presidency?
Unless you have been in a cave, or only listen to fox and other fake news sites, you have heard most of the reasons it will never be built.
Do tell? I want to hear your reason?
You can't think for yourself?
Lay one down on me, lets discuss it
Thats a lie. Romney got 61 million, Trump got 63 million. Both dems got 65 millionAnd Trump won with less votes than it took for Romney to lose. I wonder what happened there? Where did the voters go?Americans are generally very susceptible to advertising , so it isn't too surprising to see people respond favorably to sophisticated marketing techniques and name recognition. Having Hilary Clinton as an opponent helps too.I think it's important to remember that the Presidency of Donald Trump is largely a rejection of a globalist economic and political agenda. People don't like the idea of multi national corporations controlling our future. Let's hope Trump means at least part of what he says he means.
Nothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
Hilary was terrible, hopefully the dems figure it out.
But the posr about advertising is ironic since the dems have hollywood.and.the artistic community, but still need the Supreme Court to pass their laws.
Hillary got 2.65 million more votes than Trump did. The voters did't think she was terrible.
I agree some regulations are good, but the vast majority are either bearucrats on a power trip, wanting to justify their existance, to stop rivals(mostly companies) or to try and install socialismI think you mean "we're", the wall will never happen, regulation will do what it does now, protect the substantial people and corporate power/wealth at the expense of society at large, and really now; Trump treated you like children and you loved it.
Nah he didnt. So you admit regulation is.for crony capitalism and not good for us? Thats new, welcome aboard!
And the wall will happen, just another panick by you guys when it goes up. why are you so opposed to it?
Regulation in and of itself is neither good, bad, or indifferent. Your media being owned by only 6 major multinational corporations is the result of deregulation of the FCC under Clinton.
Watch, there will be no wall Mexico pays for, don't be silly.
Wall will be built and Mexico will pay for it, one way or another.
You're as nuts as Don is on this wall biz, watch. Yeah, we agree, regulations and the struggle over them are pretty much corporate power asserting its influence over the unsubstantial people and to the detriment of society at large. The very last thing the "job creator" class wants in this society is a level playing field.
Well its natural to want an advantage, but atleast people are seeing big business and big govt are on the same side.
Regulations are political weapons and are rarely used for the common good.
The wall will be built. And I cant wait for that fight.
Thats a lie. Romney got 61 million, Trump got 63 million. Both dems got 65 millionAnd Trump won with less votes than it took for Romney to lose. I wonder what happened there? Where did the voters go?Americans are generally very susceptible to advertising , so it isn't too surprising to see people respond favorably to sophisticated marketing techniques and name recognition. Having Hilary Clinton as an opponent helps too.Nothing is going to change, watch. At some point the american public is going to have to figure out that no celebrity 1%er is coming down to same them, from them.
Hilary was terrible, hopefully the dems figure it out.
But the posr about advertising is ironic since the dems have hollywood.and.the artistic community, but still need the Supreme Court to pass their laws.
Hillary got 2.65 million more votes than Trump did. The voters did't think she was terrible.
Try finding the number than regurgitatiing leftwing talking points.
