Welcome to the Banana Republic of America
Elected officials from both parties have no interest in slowing America’s decline and most are cheering it on.
and BOTH parties are at fault.
Banana Republic USA
- Thread starter eagle7-31
- Start date
and BOTH parties are at fault.
- Thread starter
- #2
Start with the indictment of former President Donald Trump. A Manhattan district attorney turned a misdemeanor, long past the statute of limitations, into a federal crime which his Manhattan D.A. predecessor, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, the former New York Attorney General, and the Federal Election Commission deemed to not be a crime and declined to prosecute.Welcome to the Banana Republic of America
Elected officials from both parties have no interest in slowing America’s decline and most are cheering it on.www.americanthinker.com
and BOTH parties are at fault.
Principal players including Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen, in written statements, made clear that even the misdemeanor didn’t happen. Yet here we are with the Democrat party and its weaponized judicial system choosing to indict their political opponent who will be the likely Republican presidential candidate next year.
This does not and never has happened in America, the government in power using such might to destroy their political opponents. Yet here we are.
Banana Republic vs Orange Dictatorship
Tough choice eh?
Seriously, instead of making up your mind over shit you see in the news...wait for the trial?
Tough choice eh?
Seriously, instead of making up your mind over shit you see in the news...wait for the trial?
Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,461
- 2,290
Unless it gets in front of a commie judge, there likely won't be any trial. It will get thrown out on day one.
We have no Commie judges..so you should be golden~
BTW..day one is the arraignment, release conditions and potential gag order. Almost a sure bet Trump will waive time and ask for a continuance as far into the future as he can get.
His team could ask for an immediate probable cause hearing..but usually this is seen as a bad move...as it gives the Prosecution a chance to preview its case without Defense rebuttal. Judge will set a motions hearing...Trump's motion to dismiss no doubt will be heard then.
- Thread starter
- #6
Orange dictatorship? That is a laugh. This is a political kangaroo show trail.
JGalt
Diamond Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 84,754
- 112,464
- 3,635
Welcome to the Banana Republic of America
Elected officials from both parties have no interest in slowing America’s decline and most are cheering it on.
and BOTH parties are at fault.
We are not a banana republic. We're now a whole damned fruit salad republic.
Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,461
- 2,290
Yes we do have commie judges. All Democrats are commies.
Unless there is something in these phony charges that wasn't revealed to the media (which I doubt) then this case should get thrown out for a number of reasons. Campaign regulations and laws are a federal matter, not a city matter. It's already been looked at by the FEC and they found no reason to pursue it. It's way past the statue of limitations. There are no laws against using NDAs to settle private matters. Testimony from Cohen's former lawyer that Cohen stated Trump never reimbursed him and furthermore, told his lawyer Trump knew nothing about him paying Stormy anything. It should be an open and shut case if there is any justice left in this country anymore.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 53,624
- 39,536
- 3,545
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 53,624
- 39,536
- 3,545
You're not wrong.
yidnar
Diamond Member
there was no dictatorship during Trumps 1st term ...
JGalt
Diamond Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 84,754
- 112,464
- 3,635
Tough choice for you, because you don't appear to have the intelligence to know the difference.
"Of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most indifferent or the most obstructed when it came to using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies.
For the Left, Donald Trump is synonymous with “fascism” (or “semi-fascism,” as Joe Biden put it the other day). And for Liz Cheney and most of the NeverTrumpers, he remains an existential threat to democracy.
But to quantify those charges, what exactly has Trump done extralegally - as opposed to his bombast and braggadocio about what he might have wished to have done?
And what are the standards by which to judge this supposed menace?
Did Trump illegally and with a mere signature nullify over $300 billion of contracted student loans—to firm up his college-student and college-graduate base nine weeks before the midterm elections?
If Trump wished to abuse his power over the IRS, he would have followed the Obama model of weaponizing it during a reelection year to go after his ideological enemies.
Did Trump blatantly use the national security apparatus of the government to enhance his own reelection bid in 2020?
Was Trump ever caught on a hot mic promising a Russian president that he would try to ease Russian worries about Eastern European missile defense if only the Russians would give him space during his 2012 campaign for president against Mitt Romney?
Did Trump weaponize the FBI? That is, did the FBI go after journalists, former Obama officials, or Democratic Party activists who variously were attacking Don Jr. or Ivanka on the pretenses of retrieving one of their lost laptops or diaries?
Are there texts of Trump-era FBI agents talking about how to “stop” Hillary Clinton’s or Biden’s election bid?
Did the Trump Justice Department start an investigation of the suspected illegal lobbying of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, who used the former’s political connections to win large cash payments from foreign governments?
Did Trump order an FBI raid on the Obama home, on rumors that there were thousands of documents under dispute with the National Archives in his possession, especially given the Obama record of fiercely fighting any Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to release his documents?
Was Jake Sullivan’s phone grabbed by the FBI at an airport to determine his role in the Russian collusion hoax?
Are there now any former Trump loyalists who, as “anonymous” officials in cabinet agencies or obstructionists on the National Security Council, are writing op-eds about their stealthy daily efforts to undermine Biden’s executive orders or his administration’s action?
Are there now “50 former intelligence officials” who signed affidavits in support of Trump’s allegations about the authenticity of Hunter’s laptop?
Between 2017 and 2020, did Trump’s team systematically seek to change the voting laws in key states to radically transform traditional balloting, in a mail-in or early voting revolution, in which only 30 percent of the electorate would vote on Election Day?
Was there any “dark money” effort analogous to the efforts of corporate and tech money along with DNC activists and Biden operators in what Time magazine’s Molly Ball described as a “conspiracy” to ensure the defeat of Trump’s opponent?
How about Trump’s efforts to revolutionize the very system of government? Did he promote a court-packing scheme to ensure he might not just get a 5-4 majority, but perhaps an 11-4 conservative advantage in a new 15-justice Supreme Court?
Did he dream up ways of getting rid of the Electoral College so the “blue wall” might never return?
Did Trump as president meet with CIA and FBI directors who, in their weekly and daily briefings, apprised him of efforts to monitor, spy, and infiltrate the campaign of Joe Biden?
The strange thing about Trump was that he did not use extraordinary powers to investigate anyone unlawfully. He boasted, he railed, he screamed, he whined, he became at times crude and obnoxious. But he did not use the FBI, the CIA, the Justice Department, or the IRS to go after the Obamas, the Clintons, or the Bidens.
In fact, of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most inept or indifferent, or the most obstructed concerning any issue of using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies. "
The Strangest Thing About "Semi-Fascist" Trump | ZeroHedge
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 52,123
- 19,485
- 2,250
Indeed,both parties are corrupt and one in the same.Too bad trolls like political chic cant accept that fact,she is a disgrace to trump supporters because she ignores that Trump is not part of that corrupt two party system that her hero Bush is we became a banana republic in 1913 and was demonstrated to the whole world on nov 22nd 1963.Welcome to the Banana Republic of America
Elected officials from both parties have no interest in slowing America’s decline and most are cheering it on.
and BOTH parties are at fault.
If this was a banana republic, Trump would already be dead.Welcome to the Banana Republic of America
Elected officials from both parties have no interest in slowing America’s decline and most are cheering it on.
and BOTH parties are at fault.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Currently: Who shouldn't have nuclear weapons asides from responsible (AKA: US/France/Israel/India) countries?- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 10
-
-
-
‘We Push for Peace’ in Minneapolis Poured $6.5M in Nonprofit Assets Into Personal Bank Accounts- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 3
