Bakers fined for not working homosexual "wedding" continue fighting for their freedoms

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)
I would think by now that it would have sunken into your brain Seawytch, especially after the 7th circuit just told the country, that race and deviant sex behaviors are not in the same legal or moral or any other type of category together.

Since you're striving to make a comparison, and you're talking about your deviant behaviors, it would be more accurate to say "Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument? The Jews about the nazis putting them to death in death camps." Behavior to behavior; not not-behavior to behavior.

And the nazis had behaviors that were well documented and understood. "LGBTQ" (speaking of delusions) is all over the map and even they aren't sure of their own leanings. Hence why lesbians seek out masculine looking women who use dildos; and gay men seek out the femme (bottom) types for an artificial vagina. I mean HELLO closeted-issues! If heteros were up to the counterpart behavior in their camp, the gays would be screaming "COME OUT OF THE CLOSET ALREADY!" to the rooftops. I guess it only works one way.....which of course then defies logical reasoning...which is the definition of delusional behavior and thoughts..

Behavior and thoughts....behavior and thoughts...........behavior and thoughts...........
Homosexuality will soon be as protected as race, gender, and religion. The path is forward not where you want it to go, back to when gays hid in the closet. Do your job and start dealing with reality. Homosexuals are now almost completely on an equal basis with white Christian heterosexuals. That might suck for you but it doesn't for the rest of us.
As it has happened before. Social structures that have normalized homosexuality fail, the gays are slaughtered and we start all over again.
Kind of like what happens with all minorities......maybe this is why white hetero males are getting so nervous.
 
You are even more ignorant then the guy that made the comment. Yall have only read blerbs you cut and past from google. Now, this topic if "off" topic for this thread, but if you and other guy would like us three can mosey to the bull ring a d discuss the bible and specifically says about divorce, who did it and what it means. Hint, there is much more then Yall think on the topic. As for homosexuality, it's covered plenty and we can go over that one to in round 2 if Yall feel like it.

I'd be happy to converse with you, when you are less deluded and can communicate in English.

But the point still stands. There are a SHITLOAD of behaviors in the Bible that Mr. and Mrs. Wifebeater didn't consider worth denying service over, including

Divorce
Women wearing Pants
Women speaking up in Church
Women wearing braids
Women wearing jewelry
People with Tattoos

Now, on Divorce, spefically, the bible goes back and forth on that one. But what Jesus said- specifically- is that it's a big no-no. And the Catholic Church, which is the majority of people who called themselves "Christians", still say it's a bad thing.

On the other hand, Jesus never said anything about homosexuality. St. Paul did, but St. Paul isn't Jesus. Neither is Moses.
 
The constitution is the only test required for religion. It is an historically tested belief. How is this in any way the same as what could actually be a delusion or obsessive compulsive disorder?

And I can't prove a black man is a black man using an objective test?

You can't be serious?

Perfectly serious.

You claimed their was an objective test for all characteristics listed in Title II (of the 1964 Civil Rights Act).

So what is the objective test for religious beliefs?


I can prove a black man is a black man. (1) visual examination - the person on the left is white, the person on the left is black. (2) DNA testing which is an objective test.


mib_primary.jpg



>>>>

Religion is a founding principle of the United States constitution.

Where is sexual orientation?

Oh, snap
 
My knowledge of history does quite well. Gays have reached acceptance before. Then that culture is overrun, the Gays are slaughtered and its time to start all over. If that wasn't true, homosexuality would have been accepted as normal for 6,000 or so years.

Sadly, the barbarism of islam is spreading without much in the way of stopping it. That will more than likely be the cause of the next wholesale slaughter.

Not that anyone will care. It's the way the world goes.
You won't be able to find even one society in which homosexuality was the cause of its downfall. Go try if you like, you won't find one.

What does kill societies is when morons like you gain too much authority. That is a death sentence eventually.
Gays have never caused the downfall of any society. This is the myth you tell yourself so you will feel better about your degeneracy and abnormality. Acceptance of homosexuality is a symptom. Not a cause. By the time any society gets to the point of acceptance, it is already quite sick and on the road to a collective death. Pus doesn't cause infection. Pus is the result of infection.
I'm straight, dummy, and you are as stupid about that as everything else.

Do you have an objective test to prove it?
No. There is no such test.

Thank you.
 
Animals have no sexual orientation. They only have instinct. The instinct is to mate. Animal romance was invented by Disney.
They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.
They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
 
They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.
They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.
 
You won't be able to find even one society in which homosexuality was the cause of its downfall. Go try if you like, you won't find one.

What does kill societies is when morons like you gain too much authority. That is a death sentence eventually.
Gays have never caused the downfall of any society. This is the myth you tell yourself so you will feel better about your degeneracy and abnormality. Acceptance of homosexuality is a symptom. Not a cause. By the time any society gets to the point of acceptance, it is already quite sick and on the road to a collective death. Pus doesn't cause infection. Pus is the result of infection.
I'm straight, dummy, and you are as stupid about that as everything else.

Do you have an objective test to prove it?
No. There is no such test.

Thank you.
You're welcome.
 
I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?
Animals have no sexual orientation. They only have instinct. The instinct is to mate. Animal romance was invented by Disney.
They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.
They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.

And, according to our friend Frank, because that behavior exists in nature, the killing of the male, by the other male, should be a protected right.

You simply can't make this shit up!
No one has said that. Homosexuality is not murder. And we limit homosexual behavior just as we do heterosexual behavior, to age appropriate groups unlike certain primates in which adults have sex with juveniles. Just because some animals eat their young doesn't mean we are going to protect that in humans. We require them to rise above such things but bears and humans still shit in the woods. That isn't going away regardless of what laws we pass.

Then your primate example was pure deflection.

Thanks
 
They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

It's irrelevant.
 
They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

I sure do, you seem a bit confused though.
 
Religion is a founding principle of the United States constitution.
No. And it is mentioned in the third amendment submitted that wasn't ratified as the Bill of Rights until more than two years after the Constitution itself was ratified.
 
Last edited:
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

It's irrelevant.
The biology is entirely relevant. Human sexuality, including sexual orientation, has never been about making babies. And humans aren't the only species that that is true for. Sex and sexuality are tools not biological imperatives.
 
Last edited:
They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.
They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Bingo. That's exactly what it is.
 
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

I sure do, you seem a bit confused though.
If you knew of the biology you wouldn't be making such idiotic arguments. Sexual orientation is a sliding scale. not a light switch on or off.
kinsey-scale-2.png
 
They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Bingo. That's exactly what it is.
Just shut your trap, ignorant drunk.
 
All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

It's irrelevant.
The biology is entirely relevant. Human sexuality, including sexual orientation, has never been about making babies. And humans aren't the only species that that is true for. Sex and sexuality are tools not imperatives.

I don't see how it's relevant. But then I think government should protect equal rights, and not get into the business of deciding what is 'normal'.
 
15th post
All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

I sure do, you seem a bit confused though.
If you knew of the biology you wouldn't be making such idiotic arguments. Sexual orientation is a sliding scale. not a light switch on or off.
kinsey-scale-2.png
There are sliding scales of all obsessive compulsive behavior. Homosexuality is more like compulsive handwashing or hoarding than it is to normal desire.
 
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

It's irrelevant.
The biology is entirely relevant. Human sexuality, including sexual orientation, has never been about making babies. And humans aren't the only species that that is true for. Sex and sexuality are tools not imperatives.

I don't see how it's relevant. But then I think government should protect equal rights, and not get into the business of deciding what is 'normal'.
Biology cannot be dictated by those with an agenda. It is what it is. The homophobes want to dictate biology therefore, reality. And it doesn't work that way.
 
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Homosexuality is not in conflict with biology. You simply do not know what the biology is to begin with.

I sure do, you seem a bit confused though.
If you knew of the biology you wouldn't be making such idiotic arguments. Sexual orientation is a sliding scale. not a light switch on or off.
kinsey-scale-2.png
There are sliding scales of all obsessive compulsive behavior. Homosexuality is more like compulsive handwashing or hoarding than it is to normal desire.
Your ignorance is beyond the ability of anyone to resolve. You simply refuse to accept the science and reality. Leave it at that.

This, or very close to it, is the reality, that you cannot accept.

queereka2.jpg
 
Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no ******* clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

All primates can and do suffer obsessive compulsive disorders.

What's your point?
That is unrelated to sexual orientation, completely.

No at all. An orientation that directly conflicts with biology is simply compulsive behavior.
Bingo. That's exactly what it is.
Just shut your trap, ignorant drunk.
See how insane you are. You actually think people pay attention to pixels on the internet!

You are nothing kiddo. You are an empty ass looking to get filled and don't know what to do between.
 
Back
Top Bottom