Bakers fined for not working homosexual "wedding" continue fighting for their freedoms

[P@triot]

If those involved in polygamy and incest are that interested in obtaining legal marriage, let them engage in the same fight as gays had to make. It was not easy

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Bwahahahaha! It's not their argument to make. The federal government has exactly 0 jurisdiction over marriage. Any other false narratives you want to try? Watching you throw shit at the wall and praying something sticks is fall down hilarious.

Federal Government has jurisdiction of equal protection of our laws

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection. They could vote. They could carry a firearm. They could attend public schools. They could practice their religion. There was not one single thing that a heterosexual was permitted to do that a homosexual was denied. Not one. Even marriage. A gay man was free to marry any woman he wanted and a gay woman was free to marry any man she wanted.

But I salute you for trying a new false narrative! That one didn't stick. Any others you'd like to try out?

 

[rightwinger]

If those involved in polygamy and incest are that interested in obtaining legal marriage, let them engage in the same fight as gays had to make. It was not easy

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Bwahahahaha! It's not their argument to make. The federal government has exactly 0 jurisdiction over marriage. Any other false narratives you want to try? Watching you throw shit at the wall and praying something sticks is fall down hilarious.

Federal Government has jurisdiction of equal protection of our laws

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection. They could vote. They could carry a firearm. They could attend public schools. They could practice their religion. There was not one single thing that a heterosexual was permitted to do that a homosexual was denied. Not one. Even marriage. A gay man was free to marry any woman he wanted and a gay woman was free to marry any man she wanted.

But I salute you for trying a new false narrative! That one didn't stick. Any others you'd like to try out?

Couldn't serve their country or marry the person they loved

Doesn't sound equal to me

 

[Syriusly]

I guess we're never going to get an answer to this vitally important question in this debate from the LGBT devotees:"

I guess we are never goint to get an answer to this vitally important question:

Why is Silhouette such a hateful bigot towards gay Americans?

 

[Syriusly]

If those involved in polygamy and incest are that interested in obtaining legal marriage, let them engage in the same fight as gays had to make. It was not easy

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Bwahahahaha! It's not their argument to make. The federal government has exactly 0 jurisdiction over marriage. Any other false narratives you want to try? Watching you throw shit at the wall and praying something sticks is fall down hilarious.

Federal Government has jurisdiction of equal protection of our laws

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection.

Nope.

There were laws passed to specifically target homosexuals in America- and law enforcement specifically targeted gay Americans for persecution.

Now that the homophobic bigots can't legally discriminate against homosexuals, they claim they are the victims.

 

[Syriusly]

If those involved in polygamy and incest are that interested in obtaining legal marriage, let them engage in the same fight as gays had to make. It was not easy

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Which works deliciously well now for family and multi partner marriage with the exclussion of "one man to one woman"

LOL- still enjoying your butt hurt that Americans who are gay can now legally marry each other- and how you predict the End of Times because of it.

 

[Syriusly]

Just calling it like I see it. I can see polygamy being legal.....not incest

Typical hypocrite liberal. "Love wins" except when they don't want it to. They cry about how people can't help who they love and nobody should attempt to tell them - and then they say "incest shouldn't be legal".

I'm just saying I doubt incest will ever be legal......do you disagree?

Sadly...no. Progressives are so sick and twisted, I have no doubt they will get it legalized through other illegal methods (just as they did with gay marriage). Right now they are working on getting pedophilia legalized. I'm sure within a decade they will get that done somehow.

Who is working on getting pedophilia legalized?

The only ones I see talking about it is right wing nut jobs.

 

[P@triot]

Who is working on getting pedophilia legalized? The only ones I see talking about it is right wing nut jobs.

Progressives are. Have been doing it for about a decade now - though the past year or so they've really ramped up their efforts.

The reason you "only see" conservatives talking about is the same reason you say that about everything - we're the only one's informed and engaged. You people prefer ideology over reality so you stay willfully ignorant. It's easier for you people - plus it frees up your time for the stuff you really care about....like Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

 

[Bush92]

....if the majority of the People didn't want gay marriage to be legal...

What do you mean "if"? Aside from the polls which shows the American people overwhelmingly reject it, all one has to do is look at Proposition 8 in California. When the most liberal state in the union votes down gay marriage, it's pretty clear that American people reject it.

What - have you really convinced yourself in your mind that the people of Utah, Texas, and Florida are supporting it while Californians aren't?

Gay federal judge and later SCOTUS overturned the will of the people.

 

[P@triot]

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection.

Nope. There were laws passed to specifically target homosexuals in America- and law enforcement specifically targeted gay Americans for persecution. Now that the homophobic bigots can't legally discriminate against homosexuals, they claim they are the victims.

No matter what how many times you tell that lie it will still be a lie. Homosexuals always had equal protection. They could vote. They could carry a firearm. They could attend public schools. They could practice their religion. There was not one single thing that a heterosexual was permitted to do that a homosexual was denied. Not one. Even marriage. A gay man was free to marry any woman he wanted and a gay woman was free to marry any man she wanted.

But I salute you for trying a new false narrative! That one didn't stick. Any others you'd like to try out?

 

[IsaacNewton]

Walmart Workers Refuse To Make Cop's Retirement Cake

Bake the f'ing cake.

 

[rightwinger]

....if the majority of the People didn't want gay marriage to be legal...

What do you mean "if"? Aside from the polls which shows the American people overwhelmingly reject it, all one has to do is look at Proposition 8 in California. When the most liberal state in the union votes down gay marriage, it's pretty clear that American people reject it.

What - have you really convinced yourself in your mind that the people of Utah, Texas, and Florida are supporting it while Californians aren't?

Gay federal judge and later SCOTUS overturned the will of the people.

Over 50 percent supported gay marriage

 

[g5000]

If those involved in polygamy and incest are that interested in obtaining legal marriage, let them engage in the same fight as gays had to make. It was not easy

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Bwahahahaha! It's not their argument to make. The federal government has exactly 0 jurisdiction over marriage. Any other false narratives you want to try? Watching you throw shit at the wall and praying something sticks is fall down hilarious.

Federal Government has jurisdiction of equal protection of our laws

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection. They could vote. They could carry a firearm. They could attend public schools. They could practice their religion. There was not one single thing that a heterosexual was permitted to do that a homosexual was denied. Not one. Even marriage. A gay man was free to marry any woman he wanted and a gay woman was free to marry any man she wanted.

But I salute you for trying a new false narrative! That one didn't stick. Any others you'd like to try out?

What a retard you are. Please tell us you aren't actually this ******* stupid.

Let's ban interracial marriages and claim blacks have the same rights as everyone else. Hey, a black man can marry any black woman he wants, amiright?

A bible compliant marriage...one man, one woman, one race.

 

[WillowTree]

Fuckin big government fascists

And put a little Shug Avery pee in it!

 

[P@triot]

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Bwahahahaha! It's not their argument to make. The federal government has exactly 0 jurisdiction over marriage. Any other false narratives you want to try? Watching you throw shit at the wall and praying something sticks is fall down hilarious.

Federal Government has jurisdiction of equal protection of our laws

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection. They could vote. They could carry a firearm. They could attend public schools. They could practice their religion. There was not one single thing that a heterosexual was permitted to do that a homosexual was denied. Not one. Even marriage. A gay man was free to marry any woman he wanted and a gay woman was free to marry any man she wanted.

But I salute you for trying a new false narrative! That one didn't stick. Any others you'd like to try out?

What a retard you are. Please tell us you aren't actually this ******* stupid.

Let's ban interracial marriages and claim blacks have the same rights as everyone else. Hey, a black man can marry any black woman he wants, amiright?

Typical progressive who has a meltdown in the face of indisputable facts. What does race have to do with anything (other than your inability to make a logical, rational argument for your unhinged, irrational position)?

Would you like to try any debate tactic other than "you're racist" while sobbing like a little girl?

 

[P@triot]

....if the majority of the People didn't want gay marriage to be legal...

What do you mean "if"? Aside from the polls which shows the American people overwhelmingly reject it, all one has to do is look at Proposition 8 in California. When the most liberal state in the union votes down gay marriage, it's pretty clear that American people reject it.

What - have you really convinced yourself in your mind that the people of Utah, Texas, and Florida are supporting it while Californians aren't?

Gay federal judge and later SCOTUS overturned the will of the people.

Over 50 percent supported gay marriage

Over 99.999% of "statistics" by rightwinger are 100% fake.

 

[bodecea]

If those involved in polygamy and incest are that interested in obtaining legal marriage, let them engage in the same fight as gays had to make. It was not easy

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Bwahahahaha! It's not their argument to make. The federal government has exactly 0 jurisdiction over marriage. Any other false narratives you want to try? Watching you throw shit at the wall and praying something sticks is fall down hilarious.

Federal Government has jurisdiction of equal protection of our laws

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection. They could vote. They could carry a firearm. They could attend public schools. They could practice their religion. There was not one single thing that a heterosexual was permitted to do that a homosexual was denied. Not one. Even marriage. A gay man was free to marry any woman he wanted and a gay woman was free to marry any man she wanted.

But I salute you for trying a new false narrative! That one didn't stick. Any others you'd like to try out?

Once, after WWII ended, an American soldier and a Soviet soldier met at a bar and, of course, the talk led to comparisons between their two countries. The American soldier bragged that in America they had freedom of speech. "I can call President Truman a son of a ***** and nothing will happen to me." The Soviet soldier replied "We too have freedom of speech. In the USSR I can call President Truman a son of a ***** and nothing will happen to me either"....Same freedom of speech.

 

[P@triot]

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Bwahahahaha! It's not their argument to make. The federal government has exactly 0 jurisdiction over marriage. Any other false narratives you want to try? Watching you throw shit at the wall and praying something sticks is fall down hilarious.

Federal Government has jurisdiction of equal protection of our laws

Another disingenuous false narrative. Homosexuals always had equal protection. They could vote. They could carry a firearm. They could attend public schools. They could practice their religion. There was not one single thing that a heterosexual was permitted to do that a homosexual was denied. Not one. Even marriage. A gay man was free to marry any woman he wanted and a gay woman was free to marry any man she wanted.

But I salute you for trying a new false narrative! That one didn't stick. Any others you'd like to try out?

Once, after WWII ended, an American soldier and a Soviet soldier met at a bar and, of course, the talk led to comparisons between their two countries. The American soldier bragged that in America they had freedom of speech. "I can call President Truman a son of a ***** and nothing will happen to me." The Soviet soldier replied "We too have freedom of speech. In the USSR I can call President Truman a son of a ***** and nothing will happen to me either"....Same freedom of speech.

It's not the same freedom of speech at all. It's just a weak attempt to give the illusion based on disingenuous wording.

Let's try an accurate example:

The American soldiers says "I can call any leader of the nation I am a citizen of a "son of a *****"

The Soviet soldier says "I can't"

 

[WorldWatcher]

Typical progressive who has a meltdown in the face of indisputable facts. What does race have to do with anything (other than your inability to make a logical, rational argument for your unhinged, irrational position)?

Would you like to try any debate tactic other than "you're racist" while sobbing like a little girl?

That wasn't a "liberal argument", the fact that people could marry but only in their same race and they were treated the same was an argument used by the State of Virginia before the Supreme Court in the Loving case in 1968 to show there was no discrimination. The case that ended interracial marriage bans.

It didn't fly then either.


>>>>

 

[P@triot]

Typical progressive who has a meltdown in the face of indisputable facts. What does race have to do with anything (other than your inability to make a logical, rational argument for your unhinged, irrational position)?

Would you like to try any debate tactic other than "you're racist" while sobbing like a little girl?

That wasn't a "liberal argument", the fact that people could marry but only in their same race and they were treated the same was an argument used by the State of Virginia before the Supreme Court in the Loving case in 1968 to show there was no discrimination. The case that ended interracial marriage bans.

It didn't fly then either

It's the equivalent of pointing to the sun to prove that you have toenails. What does it have to do with the fact that homosexuals were never denied a single right? Ever. You name a right - and homosexuals had it. They could vote, carry a firearm, practice their religion, etc. They could even marry - a homosexual man could marry any woman he wanted and a homosexual woman could marry any man that she wanted.

 

[Pop23]

If those involved in polygamy and incest are that interested in obtaining legal marriage, let them engage in the same fight as gays had to make. It was not easy

What? It was extremely easy. All they did was stack the Supreme Court with some radical political activists (instead of actual justices) and they in turn simply bypassed the people, the law, and the U.S. Constitution.

We have had a conservative court since the 70's

They ruled in the favor of same sex marriage because they had an overwhelming argument

Which works deliciously well now for family and multi partner marriage with the exclussion of "one man to one woman"

LOL- still enjoying your butt hurt that Americans who are gay can now legally marry each other- and how you predict the End of Times because of it.

And the argument showing I'm wrong is?