Ba-Boom!!! Goes the 9th Circuit...

[Ridgerunner]

Trump has now named 10 judges to the 9th Circuit — more than one-third of its active judges — compared with seven appointed by President Obama over eight years.

California and 8 other States are now dominated by Conservative Judges...

"Trump has effectively flipped the circuit," said 9th Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr., an appointee of President George W. Bush.

Trump has flipped the 9th Circuit — and some new judges are causing a 'shock wave'

 

[JGalt]

Trump flipped it!

 

[Zorro!]

Trump has now named 10 judges to the 9th Circuit — more than one-third of its active judges — compared with seven appointed by President Obama over eight years.

California and 8 other States are now dominated by Conservative Judges...

"Trump has effectively flipped the circuit," said 9th Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr., an appointee of President George W. Bush.

Trump has flipped the 9th Circuit — and some new judges are causing a 'shock wave'

“SHOCK WAVE:” LA Times troubled by Trump’s “flipping” of the 9th Circuit.

This “shock wave” is just a nonsense comment, an attempt to paint these appointments as some sort of unprecedented makeover just seven years after Reid and Obama did the same damned thing on the other coast. It’s as overblown as the hyperbole over the Ninth Circuit’s rate of reversals.​

But it does remind conservatives and moderates about the consequences of the next election. Who do they want to see appointing the next two Supreme Court justices and dozens of appellate judges — Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump?​

When Democrats dominate the judiciary we’re told — even by Chief Justice Roberts, who certainly knows better — that judges have no party. When Republicans dominate, we’re told the judiciary has become “politicized.”

 

[Oddball]

 

[Lysistrata]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

 

[Oddball]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

STFU and go drink some more fortified wine, moonbat!

 

[Zorro!]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

Read Gorsuch's book: A REPUBLIC IF YOU CAN KEEP IT!

 

[westwall]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

Supposed to be being the operative word. However we have watched activist progressive judge after activist progressive judge rule against legit cases purely on ideological grounds.

Now you get to experience that .

 

[Oddball]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

Supposed to be being the operative word. However we have watched activist progressive judge after activist progressive judge rule against legit cases purely on ideological grounds.

Now you get to experience that .

The fuckwits have never imagined how life would be if the shoe were on the other foot.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

That's been happening for years

 

[Lysistrata]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

Read Gorsuch's book: A REPUBLIC IF YOU CAN KEEP IT!

And why should I trust Gorsuch? He seems like an acolyte of Scalia, who really fancied that society should have a cast system/pecking order and that the justice system should be ruled by this idiocy. We do not need any judges who have not read the briefs in the case, listened to the case, and come to the bench with their minds already made up. Americans deserve better.

 

[Dale Smith]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.[/QUOTEBut yet? They are not and legislate from the bench and they are incorporated. They are nothing but administrators working on behalf the owners of USA.INC and members of the BAR that enforce statutory law in lieu of common law.

 

[Zorro!]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

Read Gorsuch's book: A REPUBLIC IF YOU CAN KEEP IT!

And why should I trust Gorsuch? He seems like an acolyte of Scalia, who really fancied that society should have a cast system/pecking order and that the justice system should be ruled by this idiocy...

You falsely slander a good man who has passed.

 

[Zorro!]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

Supposed to be being the operative word. However we have watched activist progressive judge after activist progressive judge rule against legit cases purely on ideological grounds.

Now you get to experience that .

Actually they won't Trump's appointing judges that actually follow the LAW and the CONSTITUTION.

 

[Zorro!]

You are sure he has flipped the 9th?

Democratic appointees still make up the majority of active judges — 16 to 13.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Wikipedia

 

[Oddball]

Why would this be something to celebrate? Judges are supposed to be impartial so that all litigants who come before them get a fair shake. Otherwise, the public's faith in the justice system and the rule of law is destroyed.

Read Gorsuch's book: A REPUBLIC IF YOU CAN KEEP IT!

And why should I trust Gorsuch? He seems like an acolyte of Scalia, who really fancied that society should have a cast system/pecking order and that the justice system should be ruled by this idiocy. We do not need any judges who have not read the briefs in the case, listened to the case, and come to the bench with their minds already made up. Americans deserve better.

And why should I trust Sotomayor? She seems like an acolyte of Ginsburg, who really fancied that society should have a cast system/pecking order and that the justice system should be ruled by this idiocy. We do not need any judges who have not read the briefs in the case, listened to the case, and come to the bench with their minds already made up. Americans deserve better.

Cuts both way, dingbat.