Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
OMG - Cyber ninjas say it was rigged , a few months after saying it was rigged and being paid by folk who say it was rigged. Say it aint so !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I don't...But, this could be a case of the totallity of the information hasn't been released yet, and therefore not officially in the public sphere...You asked earlier who Navarro was, he was in the Trump administration but has an impressive background before serving in the administration...If that information was released, there will be a record of it. Why not point to that? Do you really expect anyone to take "because I said so" as proof?Asking if there is a credible source scares you?And on cue and as expected, the usual suspects are doing nothing but crying about the source, refusing to watch videos and putting their hands over their eyes claiming they see nothing. The poor snowflakes expected things about bamboo like their LSM masters claimed. Instead they got the actual facts they can’t just sweep under the rug.
No, that doesn't scare anyone, but it is well known that the only sources you consider "credible" are the liberal media propagandists that you know will not report on this up to, and until it is too big to ignore. Then they will still treat it as CT....
STUNNING in race decided by 10,457 votes!!
3,981 voted despite registered AFTER Oct 15 deadline
11,326 voted who were NOT on rolls on Nov 7 but WERE on Dec 4
18,000 voted and then were removed from rolls AFTER election
74,243 mail-in ballots w/ NO evidence of ever being sent
Obvious cheating happened. Maricopa County has lots of splainin’ to do!
Trump won AZ!
You think anybody is going to watch a 3 hour video? You have presented nothing of value to support your claim.
You say that not knowing or caring that the 3-hour video does that, you lazy bastard.
Correct. I have no idea what that video says. The 10 minutes I watched was concerned with a vote to include or exclude some provision in a bill. Nothing to do with any audit. If you have information to present, then present it.
Watch the entire video then. Come on man. Not even you can be this dense. Meetings and hearings of that nature always begin that way.
You're lazy. Or you're consciously ignoring it because you know there is evidence in the video which will refute your position.
OK. point to where the relevant information starts.
Draino should have never started using warning labels.Their vote counts as they signed up to vote.Not being on voter rolls and still voted would mean what, you stupid mother fucker? JesusThey didn't state that in the video.So the people that found 90k votes that should have been voided are deluded as well?Of course they're deluded. It's utterly transparent, to anyone who has parented a five-year-old, that this entire charade is the result of an egomaniac throwing a fit, a narcissist who simply can't admit he failed. The people pushing this shit are either simpletons who can't parse reality, or nihilists who are deliberately trying to undermine our democracy. Unfortunately, far too many people in the US fill that bill.Apparently, not too deludedWhy do you not think this is not a big deal?
I wouldn't necessarily say that. Could be a very big deal. These jackasses are playing with fire. This kind of crap can bring a country down.
But it's still a circle jerk amongst deluded morons.
So, why are you taking that as fact?
"So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes.."No, I don't...But, this could be a case of the totallity of the information hasn't been released yet, and therefore not officially in the public sphere...You asked earlier who Navarro was, he was in the Trump administration but has an impressive background before serving in the administration...If that information was released, there will be a record of it. Why not point to that? Do you really expect anyone to take "because I said so" as proof?Asking if there is a credible source scares you?And on cue and as expected, the usual suspects are doing nothing but crying about the source, refusing to watch videos and putting their hands over their eyes claiming they see nothing. The poor snowflakes expected things about bamboo like their LSM masters claimed. Instead they got the actual facts they can’t just sweep under the rug.
No, that doesn't scare anyone, but it is well known that the only sources you consider "credible" are the liberal media propagandists that you know will not report on this up to, and until it is too big to ignore. Then they will still treat it as CT....
"Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist and author. He served in the Trump administration as the Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator."
![]()
Peter Navarro - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes....In any case, I think we should wait until the AZ senate puts out their final report...
I'm shocked and dismayed.OMG - Cyber ninjas say it was rigged , a few months after saying it was rigged and being paid by folk who say it was rigged. Say it aint so !!
LOL right? Because cyber security companies have no business involving themselves in electronics and the internet.Why in the holy fuck would I believe that? Because the "Cyber Ninjas" said so? Gimme a break.AGAIN, 90k votes in ONE county. He lost AZ by how many votes?"accept our bullshit elections so our country stays together!"![]()
"throw a fit every time your douchebag loses, consequences be damned!"
Who is the deluded one here?
Because GIGO.LOL right? Because cyber security companies have no business involving themselves in electronics and the internet.Why in the holy fuck would I believe that? Because the "Cyber Ninjas" said so? Gimme a break.AGAIN, 90k votes in ONE county. He lost AZ by how many votes?"accept our bullshit elections so our country stays together!"![]()
"throw a fit every time your douchebag loses, consequences be damned!"
Who is the deluded one here?![]()
If the information hasn't been released, then what is the thread supposed to be about? Somebody who doesn't know spouting numbers?No, I don't...But, this could be a case of the totallity of the information hasn't been released yet, and therefore not officially in the public sphere...You asked earlier who Navarro was, he was in the Trump administration but has an impressive background before serving in the administration...If that information was released, there will be a record of it. Why not point to that? Do you really expect anyone to take "because I said so" as proof?Asking if there is a credible source scares you?And on cue and as expected, the usual suspects are doing nothing but crying about the source, refusing to watch videos and putting their hands over their eyes claiming they see nothing. The poor snowflakes expected things about bamboo like their LSM masters claimed. Instead they got the actual facts they can’t just sweep under the rug.
No, that doesn't scare anyone, but it is well known that the only sources you consider "credible" are the liberal media propagandists that you know will not report on this up to, and until it is too big to ignore. Then they will still treat it as CT....
"Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist and author. He served in the Trump administration as the Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator."
![]()
Peter Navarro - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes....In any case, I think we should wait until the AZ senate puts out their final report...
Yep, knew that, among a slew of other excuses will come as these irregularities are made public...The thing to remember is that the American people will see them, and most of us are not as far down the Socialist rabbit hole as you..."So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes.."No, I don't...But, this could be a case of the totallity of the information hasn't been released yet, and therefore not officially in the public sphere...You asked earlier who Navarro was, he was in the Trump administration but has an impressive background before serving in the administration...If that information was released, there will be a record of it. Why not point to that? Do you really expect anyone to take "because I said so" as proof?Asking if there is a credible source scares you?And on cue and as expected, the usual suspects are doing nothing but crying about the source, refusing to watch videos and putting their hands over their eyes claiming they see nothing. The poor snowflakes expected things about bamboo like their LSM masters claimed. Instead they got the actual facts they can’t just sweep under the rug.
No, that doesn't scare anyone, but it is well known that the only sources you consider "credible" are the liberal media propagandists that you know will not report on this up to, and until it is too big to ignore. Then they will still treat it as CT....
"Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist and author. He served in the Trump administration as the Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator."
![]()
Peter Navarro - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes....In any case, I think we should wait until the AZ senate puts out their final report...
Anyone that voluntarily served under Drump and contributed to his lies has zero credibility.
STUNNING in race decided by 10,457 votes!!
3,981 voted despite registered AFTER Oct 15 deadline
11,326 voted who were NOT on rolls on Nov 7 but WERE on Dec 4
18,000 voted and then were removed from rolls AFTER election
74,243 mail-in ballots w/ NO evidence of ever being sent
Obvious cheating happened. Maricopa County has lots of splainin’ to do!
Trump won AZ!
You think anybody is going to watch a 3 hour video? You have presented nothing of value to support your claim.
You say that not knowing or caring that the 3-hour video does that, you lazy bastard.
Correct. I have no idea what that video says. The 10 minutes I watched was concerned with a vote to include or exclude some provision in a bill. Nothing to do with any audit. If you have information to present, then present it.
Watch the entire video then. Come on man. Not even you can be this dense. Meetings and hearings of that nature always begin that way.
You're lazy. Or you're consciously ignoring it because you know there is evidence in the video which will refute your position.
I asked this before. Lets say Dump actually won. What are you going to do about it?Yep, knew that, among a slew of other excuses will come as these irregularities are made public...The thing to remember is that the American people will see them, and most of us are not as far down the Socialist rabbit hole as you..."So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes.."No, I don't...But, this could be a case of the totallity of the information hasn't been released yet, and therefore not officially in the public sphere...You asked earlier who Navarro was, he was in the Trump administration but has an impressive background before serving in the administration...If that information was released, there will be a record of it. Why not point to that? Do you really expect anyone to take "because I said so" as proof?Asking if there is a credible source scares you?And on cue and as expected, the usual suspects are doing nothing but crying about the source, refusing to watch videos and putting their hands over their eyes claiming they see nothing. The poor snowflakes expected things about bamboo like their LSM masters claimed. Instead they got the actual facts they can’t just sweep under the rug.
No, that doesn't scare anyone, but it is well known that the only sources you consider "credible" are the liberal media propagandists that you know will not report on this up to, and until it is too big to ignore. Then they will still treat it as CT....
"Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist and author. He served in the Trump administration as the Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator."
![]()
Peter Navarro - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes....In any case, I think we should wait until the AZ senate puts out their final report...
Anyone that voluntarily served under Drump and contributed to his lies has zero credibility.
Every time you open your money maker.Because GIGO.LOL right? Because cyber security companies have no business involving themselves in electronics and the internet.Why in the holy fuck would I believe that? Because the "Cyber Ninjas" said so? Gimme a break.AGAIN, 90k votes in ONE county. He lost AZ by how many votes?"accept our bullshit elections so our country stays together!"![]()
"throw a fit every time your douchebag loses, consequences be damned!"
Who is the deluded one here?![]()
You are ignoring what you want to. But im sure thats different, right?This all comes down to people who will believe anything because they want to. It's essentially religion.
I'm literally stunned that the people being paid to say there was voter fraud actually said just that.I'm shocked and dismayed.OMG - Cyber ninjas say it was rigged , a few months after saying it was rigged and being paid by folk who say it was rigged. Say it aint so !!
If the information hasn't been released, then what is the thread supposed to be about? Somebody who doesn't know spouting numbers?No, I don't...But, this could be a case of the totallity of the information hasn't been released yet, and therefore not officially in the public sphere...You asked earlier who Navarro was, he was in the Trump administration but has an impressive background before serving in the administration...If that information was released, there will be a record of it. Why not point to that? Do you really expect anyone to take "because I said so" as proof?Asking if there is a credible source scares you?And on cue and as expected, the usual suspects are doing nothing but crying about the source, refusing to watch videos and putting their hands over their eyes claiming they see nothing. The poor snowflakes expected things about bamboo like their LSM masters claimed. Instead they got the actual facts they can’t just sweep under the rug.
No, that doesn't scare anyone, but it is well known that the only sources you consider "credible" are the liberal media propagandists that you know will not report on this up to, and until it is too big to ignore. Then they will still treat it as CT....
"Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist and author. He served in the Trump administration as the Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator."
![]()
Peter Navarro - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes....In any case, I think we should wait until the AZ senate puts out their final report...
My understanding is that Navarro is analyzing what IS known from the hearing so far. But, like I said, I think it would be best to see the final report...If the information hasn't been released, then what is the thread supposed to be about? Somebody who doesn't know spouting numbers?No, I don't...But, this could be a case of the totallity of the information hasn't been released yet, and therefore not officially in the public sphere...You asked earlier who Navarro was, he was in the Trump administration but has an impressive background before serving in the administration...If that information was released, there will be a record of it. Why not point to that? Do you really expect anyone to take "because I said so" as proof?Asking if there is a credible source scares you?And on cue and as expected, the usual suspects are doing nothing but crying about the source, refusing to watch videos and putting their hands over their eyes claiming they see nothing. The poor snowflakes expected things about bamboo like their LSM masters claimed. Instead they got the actual facts they can’t just sweep under the rug.
No, that doesn't scare anyone, but it is well known that the only sources you consider "credible" are the liberal media propagandists that you know will not report on this up to, and until it is too big to ignore. Then they will still treat it as CT....
"Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist and author. He served in the Trump administration as the Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator."
![]()
Peter Navarro - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, I am pretty sure that just the fact that he served under Trump will disqualify him in your eyes....In any case, I think we should wait until the AZ senate puts out their final report...
I'm ignoring nonsense from idiots.You are ignoring what you want to. But im sure thats different, right?This all comes down to people who will believe anything because they want to. It's essentially religion.