Axios Deletes Fact-Check on Kamala Harris

Mr. Friscus

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2020
4,493
4,714
1,938
More Big Tech Democrat activism

1. Harris, when asked about Trumps response to the pandemic:
“There was no stockpile … of vaccines. There was no national strategy or plan for vaccinations. We were leaving it to the states and local leaders to try and figure it out. And so in many ways, we’re starting from scratch on something that’s been raging for almost an entire year!”

2. Leftist media source Axios at first pointed out Harris' wrong claim in a tweet
“.@VP Harris to @mikeallen: ‘There was no national strategy or plan for [COVID-19] vaccinations. We’re starting from scratch.’ At a press conference last month, Fauci said ‘we certainly are not starting from scratch’ on vaccine distribution.'”

3. Leftist "fact-check" site Politifact agreed
“.@VP told @mikeallen that ‘there was no national strategy or plan for vaccinations’ and that Biden admin was ‘starting from scratch.’ That’s wrong. The Trump admin had a plan to distribute to locations chosen by states and let them take it from there.”

4. Axios deletes their fact check, and instead change it so that it's only her quotes, not a fact check, without bringing up Fauci's cross-check of her false claims

5. It's important to note that the Axios reporter who covers Harris was dating a Biden administration member.


Deleting fact-checks for Kamala Harris. Just another daily example of Big Tech Democrat activism, protecting who they support.
 
quit supporting these corrupt companies.... support the little guys
 
When someone deletes a statement from the VP because it's pure, made up bullshit, that means that the VP is ignorant and that a lot of people would rather you remain ignorant of that fact.
 
Seems half true?

There was a plan to get vaccines and distribute to the states, but no national plan to get the vaccines in to the arms of the people....that was left up to the 50 States to do their own thing?
 
Seems half true?

There was a plan to get vaccines and distribute to the states, but no national plan to get the vaccines in to the arms of the people....that was left up to the 50 States to do their own thing?

Yes. Allowing states to govern themselves is a plan. It's anti-dictator behavior, allowing state freedoms. It's not as if the only option is some gigantic gov't decree. The states will definitely be more efficient by distributing it themselves.
 
Seems half true?

There was a plan to get vaccines and distribute to the states, but no national plan to get the vaccines in to the arms of the people....that was left up to the 50 States to do their own thing?

Yes. Allowing states to govern themselves is a plan. It's anti-dictator behavior, allowing state freedoms. It's not as if the only option is some gigantic gov't decree. The states will definitely be more efficient by distributing it themselves.
The State's clearly need help from the federal gvt because they are failing in getting people vaccinated quickly.... I don't know if it is money for opening vaccination centers... or to set up good systems to request a vaccine, or infomercials promoting it or whatever, but the state's need a unified game plan.
 
The State's clearly need help from the federal gvt because they are failing in getting people vaccinated quickly.... I don't know if it is money for opening vaccination centers... or to set up good systems to request a vaccine, or infomercials promoting it or whatever, but the state's need a unified game plan.

Why do you think the federal government will do a better job coming into states and setting things up than the states themselves? Historically, that's not how it works. The Federal government screws up most things and makes them worse.
 
She is a straight up fucking liar. They are not starting from scratch on a vaccine distribution strategy.

What an evil lying bitch.
 

Forum List

Back
Top