Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

Rye Catcher

Platinum Member
Nov 21, 2019
12,780
7,607
940
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
thanks,, you just described the democrat party to a tee,,
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
Use a mirror.
 
thanks,, you just described the democrat party to a tee,,
Exactly What I was going to point out. Turd Catcher's pathetic attempt to pretend that leftist sociopaths aren't the most tyrannical murderous mob is just as laughable as the bed wetter's 60 year campaign to assert The National German Workers Party was "right wing" and somehow more reprehensible than the regimes of Stalin or Mao that killed many times more people.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
Use a mirror.
I have a window; sad that you and the others above are so out of touch with politics.
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
Use a mirror.
I have a window; sad that you and the others above are so out of touch with politics.
a window and no mirror explains why you dont see your own actions are exactly what you describe in your OP,,,
 
Note to Mods: Not one of the posts in response to this thread have posted a credible response. It's clear that they're all supporters of Donald Trump; Trumpism was an attempt by him to be a leader in the form of Putin, XI, Kim, et al. Sadly they're incapable of acknowledging this truth.
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
The Trumpsters will change the subject of course, as they maintain their intense emotional attachment to an aggressive, flamboyant, hypersensitive, pugilistic, punitive, nationalist authoritarian.

The only question is whether they're lying or simply a part of this group psychosis that has developed over the last five years.
 
Note to Mods: Not one of the posts in response to this thread have posted a credible response. It's clear that they're all supporters of Donald Trump, and thus to acknowledge Trumpism was an attempt by him to be a leader in the form of Putin, XI, Kim, et al.
I dont support trump and gave a response that makes perfect sense when you look in from the outside,,
you just didnt like it because it makes you think and realize that youre one of the bad guys,,
 
Note to Mods: Not one of the posts in response to this thread have posted a credible response. It's clear that they're all supporters of Donald Trump; Trumpism was an attempt by him to be a leader in the form of Putin, XI, Kim, et al. Sadly they're incapable of acknowledging this truth.
That is a lie.

The fact that rhe Harris/Biden administration is governing by executive order proves it.

On a happier note, though, it pleases me that the people who run the facility gave you a window. That was kind of them.
 
Note to Mods: Not one of the posts in response to this thread have posted a credible response. It's clear that they're all supporters of Donald Trump; Trumpism was an attempt by him to be a leader in the form of Putin, XI, Kim, et al. Sadly they're incapable of acknowledging this truth.

Seriously, HOW did you get such a high opinion of yourself? Again, this is precisely what Newsome is.
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
The Trumpsters will change the subject of course, as they maintain their intense emotional attachment to an aggressive, flamboyant, hypersensitive, pugilistic, punitive, nationalist authoritarian.

The only question is whether they're lying or simply a part of this group psychosis that has developed over the last five years.
I would not necessarily call your tds a psychosis, but it has certainly robbed you of even the most scant degree of rationality.

Especially considering how it has been Democrat governors who have been most zealous by way of restricting people's rights and doing so in such strong-armed ways, a person would have to be virtually retarded not to notice.
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
The Trumpsters will change the subject of course, as they maintain their intense emotional attachment to an aggressive, flamboyant, hypersensitive, pugilistic, punitive, nationalist authoritarian.

The only question is whether they're lying or simply a part of this group psychosis that has developed over the last five years.
I would not necessarily call your tds a psychosis, but it has certainly robbed you of even the most scant degree of rationality.

Especially considering how it has been Democrat governors who have been most zealous by way of restricting people's rights and doing so in such strong-armed ways, a person would have to be virtually retarded not to notice.
Precisely as I predicted.

This is too easy. You people literally can't help yourselves.
 
Note to Mods: Not one of the posts in response to this thread have posted a credible response. It's clear that they're all supporters of Donald Trump; Trumpism was an attempt by him to be a leader in the form of Putin, XI, Kim, et al. Sadly they're incapable of acknowledging this truth.
That is a lie.

The fact that rhe Harris/Biden administration is governing by executive order proves it.

On a happier note, though, it pleases me that the people who run the facility gave you a window. That was kind of them.

Your sophistry ["The fact that rhe Harris/Biden administration is governing by executive order proves it."] is ludicrous. The Senate under the leadership of McConnell and the cowardly fear of his caucus (under threats from Trump) put themselves before our country, and We the People. Forcing Biden to issue executive orders to aid the citizens of the United States.

BTW: sophistry is nothing more than a BIG LIE; thus is misspoke, sophistry was clearly too sophisticated
 
Note to Mods: Not one of the posts in response to this thread have posted a credible response. It's clear that they're all supporters of Donald Trump; Trumpism was an attempt by him to be a leader in the form of Putin, XI, Kim, et al. Sadly they're incapable of acknowledging this truth.
That is a lie.

The fact that rhe Harris/Biden administration is governing by executive order proves it.

On a happier note, though, it pleases me that the people who run the facility gave you a window. That was kind of them.

Your sophistry ["The fact that rhe Harris/Biden administration is governing by executive order proves it."] is ludicrous. The Senate under the leadership of McConnell and the cowardly fear of his caucus (under threats from Trump) put themselves before our country, and We the People. Forcing Biden to issue executive orders to aid the citizens of the United States.

BTW: sophistry is nothing more than a BIG LIE; thus is misspoke, sophistry was clearly too sophisticated
its not the job of the feds to aid the american people,,
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.
Partisans on both sides will call the other "authoritarian." I would not have used the term to Trump before he pulled his insurrection bs. But it may be just that he's incapable of accepting losing. Maybe it's more one of his weird defects of personality than a desire to destroy our Republic. LOL

The Dem governors were probably more apt to issue executive decisions banning gatherings during covid. And the gop had some perhaps not totally unfounded concerns that Obama wanted to regulate what employers were able to not cover.

But yes, Xi is a good example of authoritarianism. The Taliban, absolutely.
 
"Authoritarian leadership refers to any situation where a leader keeps hold of as much power and authority as possible. Also known as coercive or dictatorial leadership, authoritarian leaders, tend to keep all the decision-making authority to themselves and make the decisions about policies, procedures, tasks, structures, rewards and punishment themselves. The intention behind most authoritarian leaders is to retain control and they usually require unquestioning obedience and compliance.

"Anyone failing to comply or becoming disobedience are likely to be threatened or actually subjected to some form of punishment.

"Additionally, authoritarian leaders have been found to be significantly more likely to engage in a range of both overt and covert (hidden) manipulative behaviors, tactics and even intimidation to try to ensure compliance with their wishes."

"One of the consequences of authoritarian leadership has been shown to be increased stress levels with employees, particularly when they are working under a regime that is intolerant of mistakes, expects blind obedience and compliance and drives performance through expectations that employees should be working harder and faster."
"Additionally, authoritarian leadership has been show to lead to abuses of power. A number of studies have shown that authoritarian leaders tend to be emotionally detached and are often unable to empathize with others. In effect, they are task rather than people oriented leaders."


Authoritarian leadership: Definition and explanation

What is authoritarian leadership? https://youtu.
www.oxford-review.com

This form of leadership is the antithesis of Western Democratic Republics and exists today in Russia, China, N. Korea, Miramar, Belarus and most Muslim Countries.


intimidation? Llike having band of violent thugs rioting and burning and killing during an election?


I would think any such election, would not be legitimate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top