Honesty is never wasted. lol. THAT is why I want exhaustive studies. I have a Bio-Chemistry Minor and I am in AWE of what they have achieved with mRNA; BUT I want them thoroughly researched and let the SCIENCE go where it may. It may well be that they were amazingly fantastic in very many but also it may be that many also had negative effects; it's a matter of THOROUGH research. Not Science aimed at getting a desired result; Paradigm saturation springs to mind.The 3% where not effective, yes. I suppose something about the way their immune system works, due to individual genetic, though I am no immunologist. Always exceptions, just like with the Covid inoculations (notice I used "inoculations" not vaccines, recognizing difference) many people, probably vast majority, realizing benefit and protection, even if it only amounted to lighter case. But, there were and are a significant number, whose systemic reactions put them at mortal risk, even death. It invites questions of, 1. what is different in their genetic make up, that react so different? 2. If it is possibly genetic, how can there still be no definitive test to know who would be at risk if taking the inoculation? Worse, (and more cynical), the question, Or is there already such a test? I cannot honestly rule that out, due to possibly very expensive, and again only of benefit to the tiny fraction, those written off by scientific community in the name of maximum benefit over cost and profit ethics or lack there of. Damn! What a cynical sonovabitch paragraph for me to even write!
Greg