Utterly gullible assholes such as you have never figured out how to distill all the crap out of these polls.
You look even more asinine when you can't even spell it correctly.
I haven't been around here in a while but don't take this the wrong way: are you really retarded or are you just pulling everybody's leg? Ooooooh also, the typo, you are cool!!!!!!!!!!!!! * you are out of bullets* don't show up on Nov.6 or 7, i'm gonna tear you a new asshole.
Welcome back Mr. Obama.
Anyway, I will lower myself to try to educate even a losing moron ***** like you.
Let's use Colorado as an example.
START with some RECENT numbers:
Active Registered Dems as of Oct 2012 = ~ 871,000 +/-
Active Registered Republicans as of Oct 2012 = ~ 912,000 +/-
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VoterRegNumbers/2012/20121019/VotersByPartyStatus.pdf
But, let's look at the Denver Post Poll for Colorado idiots like you rely upon:
The survey sample was 34 percent Republican, 35 percent Democrat and 27 percent unaffiliated
--
Poll: Obama, Romney still essentially tied in Colorado - The Denver Post
Why would a
poll that has more Dims than Republicans in a State with more active Republican voters than Dim voters be deemed all that reliable, pray tell?
The slight edge
artificially and inaccurately given to the Dims
still results in essentially a "tie."
Logic might inform you, if you were not such a hack, that the outcome is more likely to be in favor of the Republican, ESPECIALLY given that it is a weak ass incumbent for whom the Dims would have to get out the vote.
Goodbye Barry! Adios. Hasta la vista, bubbalah. Ciao. Sayonara. Shalom. Aloha. Good riddance.