Rigby5
Diamond Member
the evidence does not indicate there was a clear and present danger that required doing so.You mean the Israeli accusations that was the case? No, however even if accurate, that does not justify putting innocent foreign nationals at risk, the evidence does not indicate there was a clear and present danger that required doing so. The Israelis are incredibly fortunate that they didn't end up injuring or killing a foreign national in that attack given that American and Qatari news organizations occupied that building.Did you miss the part about the terrorists holding up there?How would that justify a missile strike on a building full of innocent people, not to mention International News Outlets?This is a massive story! Both the AP and Al-Jazeera media offices were sharing space with Hamas terrorists in a building owned and operated by a Hamas group.
What evidence would that be? That they were coordinating the ongoing daily rocket launches into civilian areas in Israel? What needs to be happening before you see a "clear and present danger", Dumbass?
Israel clearly started beating, arresting, shooting, and illegally confiscating homes first.
There is no way anyone can blame Hamas for this, which was totally and completely the fault of Israel and their hyper evil military.