Assassination attempt of Trump in PA

The plot thickens!

Figured I better screenshot it before it's memoryholed...

1000002429.webp
 
But despite all of that, the Democrats are going to lose to him again because of their incompetence
When Hillary lost She conceded

She is still fit to serve in that office. Trump the ***** grabber dept sure rapist. and cheating on his wife porn star ******


But nobody should shoot him for that


Crooks was registered as a Republican and was in active voting status, according to the database service LexisNexis.


So the SHOOTER IS A 20 year old REGISTERED REPUBLICAN WHO LIKED TO PLAY WITH GUNS.
 
Last edited:
They had a gun trained on him…still let him fire at least on shot. A video was played way back 3hrs ago. I called it! Another poster said sipers cant fire until the perp does? Huh? Thats crazy. He was a threat right away crawling on the roof. It appears they were going to let him kill DJT theh kill him. Dead men don’t talk?

The secret service guys had the shooter in their sights well before shots were fired at Trump. They allowed the shooter to fire. Why? This was an inside job.
 
When Hillary lost She concededz

She is still fit to serve in that office. Trump the ***** grabber dept sure rapist. and cheating on his wife porn star ******


But nobody should shoot him for that


Crooks was registered as a Republican and was in active voting status, according to the database service LexisNexis.


So the SHOOTER IS A 20 year old REGISTERED REPUBLICAN WHO LIKED TO PLAY WITH GUNS.

I have no idea how that addresses what I said true or not.
 
The secret service guys had the shooter in their sights well before shots were fired at Trump. They allowed the shooter to fire. Why? This was an inside job.
How do you know that SS had Crooks in their sight well before shots were fired?
 
How do you know that SS had Crooks in their sight well before shots were fired?
Multiple videos posted on this site and elsewhere. Two guns were on the shooter before he fired. He was literally in the SS sights. Why didn't they take the guy out? Why did they wait until the sniper got off shots?
 
Multiple videos posted on this site and elsewhere. Two guns were on the shooter before he fired. He was literally in the SS sights. Why didn't they take the guy out? Why did they wait until the sniper got off shots?
How can you tell who was in whose sights from a video?
 
So you’re just going to make wild accusations that aren’t being reported on anywhere else in any news outlet, and then not provide a single link to back up your claims

Gotcha



I just posted idiot. It's all over the internet. Opening your ******* eyes.


 
15th post

You can’t tell from that video if they had anyone in their sights prior to the shooting.

And there’s a big difference between being “seconds too late” and having the shooter in their sights three full minutes without doing anything, as you claimed
 
You can’t tell from that video if they had anyone in their sights prior to the shooting.

And there’s a big difference between being “seconds too late” and having the shooter in their sights three full minutes without doing anything, as you claimed


I never said a full three minutes. You're lying. But that's what Dims do. They clearly have the shooter lined up and allow him to fire first. Why?
 
I just posted idiot. It's all over the internet. Opening your ******* eyes.



Where in that video is their evidence that the SS had the shooter in their sights?

They could have been doing routine visual sweeps when the shooting started. You can’t tell what they did or did not see from that angle
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom