Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did you get that made up shit?
| 2021-I | 2021-II | 2021-III | 2021-IV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | % | |
| Democrat | 30 | 31 | 28 | 28 |
| Democratic-leaning independent | 19 | 18 | 17 | 14 |
| Non-leaning independent | 10 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| Republican-leaning independent | 15 | 17 | 16 | 19 |
| Republican | 25 | 26 | 28 | 28 |
2021?GALLUP POLL
Changes in Party Identification and Leaning, by Quarter, 2021
In politics, as of today, do you consider yourself -- [a Republican, a Democrat] -- or an independent? // As of today, do you lean more to the -- [Democratic Party or the Republican Party]?
2021-I 2021-II 2021-III 2021-IV % % % % Democrat 30 31 28 28 Democratic-leaning independent 19 18 17 14 Non-leaning independent 10 5 8 9 Republican-leaning independent 15 17 16 19 Republican 25 26 28 28
You should laugh. That’s all you have with your stupid assertions. So, 62% of your trailer park ?2021?
This OP is fake news.
As President Trump is indicted for January 6,
more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.5 Au 2023 ~~ By Andrea Widburg
As President Trump is indicted for January 6, more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.
Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictme...www.americanthinker.com
Once Trump announced a rally in D.C., he and his supporters were doomed.
Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictment against Donald Trump. One of the things that Fox News prevented from airing was an interview with former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund, during which he told Tucker that the FBI had “a lot of operatives” in the crowd. There was more, and it all feeds into the reasonable belief that January 6 was a set-up.
January 6 has been enormously useful to the Democrats:
Knowing how useful January 6 was for Democrats—and considering that the “insurrection” narrative kicked within fewer than 24 hours —it’s worth considering a very loose rundown of the timeline.
- It allowed them to certify the electoral college votes without any objections. These objections (which Democrats have vigorously made over the years) are a prerequisite to challenging the count.
- It allowed them to round up almost 1,000 Trump supporters and destroy their lives, a useful lesson to anyone else who might think about opposing the Biden regime…er, administration.
- It allowed them to pretend that the lack of crowds in D.C. for Biden’s inauguration was due to security requirements rather than to the reality, which is that no one would have shown up anyway.
- And, of course, most usefully at all, it’s just allowed them to indict Biden’s chief rival, President Donald Trump, in the lead-up to the 2024 election. The charge, while failing to use the word “insurrection,” essentially alleges that Trump defrauded America by ignoring those of his advisors who believed in the 2024 election (many of whom have been outed as fervent Trump haters) and, instead, looking to evidence of election of fraud and believing that election.
In event after event, it’s the system, not Trump, that’s inexorably pulling the crowd into the Capitol. And in event after event, it was Trump who tried to put the brakes on things, only to be blocked.
- Trump announced a rally in D.C. on the day that the Senate was set to certify the election.
- Trump asks for extra security in D.C. for that day, a request that is refused.
- Trump tells those at the rally who “will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voice heard.”
- The crowd at the Capitol did not become agitated until the police, without any warning to the crowd to disperse, suddenly fired flash bangs into the crowd.
- People in whom the FBI had no interest were filmed removing barriers and urging people into the Capitol. (See here and here.) Significantly, those who weren’t on the front lines would have had no idea that they weren’t being invited into the Capitol, especially because the Capitol police were welcoming them in (which should negate any charges that they were illegally trespassing).
- Trump immediately issued tweets telling the crowd to remain peaceful and disperse. (See here and here.) Soon after, Twitter shut down his account, making his tweet inaccessible for posterity to revisit.
- Trump tried to get to the Capitol to calm the crowd but was prevented from doing so.
- Capitol police apparently beat one Trump supporter to death and shot to death an unarmed woman. Otherwise, no one suffered any serious injuries at the hands of the crowd—although Democrats lied relentlessly about Officer Sicknick, who emerged unscathed on January 6, only to die later from a stroke.
The previously hidden revelations from former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund are entirely consistent with the above facts:
Former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund told Tucker Carlson “there was a fair amount of law enforcement” in the January 6th crowd, in footage exclusively obtained by The National Pulse. The bombshell news follows revelations that Sund had called the events surrounding the Capitol riot “a cover up,” adding his concerns over provocateurs like Ray Epps.
Indeed, added Sund, in over 30 years of police work, he’d never seen so much law enforcement. In the same suppressed interview, Sund also revealed that the FBI had worked with him during the IMF protests and the Bush inauguration.
You can see the entire interview at The National Pulse.
Commentary:
Yes!, It was a setup. conservatives would be wise to watch for even more false flag operations heading into the 2024 elections. Not just the presidential race, but any conservative gathering. Expect moreDemocratgovernor kidnapping plots, more Republican rallies infiltrated by ANTIFA and FBI/Stasi, more terrorist parents protecting their children and there are always those Catholic terrorists. Just watch how it unfolds. It has been so successful so why wouldn't the Maoist/DSA Democrat Commies just ramp it up?
Conservatives need to be very, very careful.
It is highly probable that there was indeed a conspiracy to obstruct government processes, but it was the opposite of what Smith alleges. It was a Democratic operation led by Nancy Pelosi and demonstrated by FBI/Stasi operatives. Among the many reasons for the Left to prevent Trump's re-election is the possibility that a real inquiry into Jan 6 would be conducted.
Andrea Wilberg is a journalist for a conservative blog.This OP is fake news.
I own my house. Do you?You should laugh. That’s all you have with your stupid assertions. So, 62% of your trailer park ?
61 cases did nothing to convince people there was no fraud. We saw state elections run like total shit and anything that could have proven there was no fraud or fraud was never allowed to be seen. No forensic audits and no evidentiary hearings.Andrea Wilberg is a journalist for a conservative blog.
Just a hit job with no references, no evidence. Too bad she didn’t supply her story 61 times before…to a judge.
So, you know little about the legal system. You go before a judge WITH YOUR EVIDENCE, SHOW THE JUDGE then ask for a hearing. Otherwise, every Tom Dick and Donald could just tie up the courts asking for a hearing with no evidence.61 cases did nothing to convince people there was no fraud. We saw state elections run like total shit and anything that could have proven there was no fraud or fraud was never allowed to be seen. No forensic audits and no evidentiary hearings.
It is not going away but the last word will not be from the people who did this or jerks like you that support them. Count on it.
I lost count of them, and you ?I own my house. Do you?
You cannot show your evidence without an evidentiary hearing. You know nothing about the law.So, you know little about the legal system. You go before a judge WITH YOUR EVIDENCE, SHOW THE JUDGE then ask for a hearing. Otherwise, every Tom Dick and Donald could just tie up the courts asking for a hearing with no evidence.
So far, the judges or anyone else have not seen the evidence, just blather. Maybe you could help us. Trump announced he was going to show it a while back, but, we’re still waiting. You know where he’s hiding it ?
I forgot you are elite. You are also a dumb fuck.I lost count of them, and you ?
The difference between your story and mine is, I actually looked why his hearings were all dismissed. You just have your head up trump’s ass. Now tell us where Trumps evidence is hiding. Where is it BS artist. Where ?You cannot show your evidence without an evidentiary hearing. You know nothing about the law.
Of course….I’m a brain surgeon too. Have been real busy since Trump came into office. I’ll clear my calendar for you if you wish. It will take just a few minutes to get your head out of his buttocks.I forgot you are elite. You are also a dumb fuck.
No one forced trump to go this route. He did this to himself. As will be revealed during his trial , he and others conspired in an organized effort with militia leaders ( most already convicted ) in sedition. Fortunately the sane people on the other side did not overreact to this sad futile attempt to destroy our country. If they had an there was a lot of bloodshed ( as trump had hoped / no concern for his followers he put in harm's way ) trump could have declared martial law and achieved his goal of dictatorship.
As President Trump is indicted for January 6,
more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.5 Au 2023 ~~ By Andrea WidburgAs President Trump is indicted for January 6, more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.
Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictme...
Once Trump announced a rally in D.C., he
Elite-select group that is superior in terms of ability or qualities to the rest of a group or society:I forgot you are elite. You are also a dumb fuck.
That's ironic, seeing as you folks have put all your hopes on an ambulance chaser in Fulton County.Dershowitz should put the fire out on what little hair he has left. He has become a caricature. Not that he ever resembled anything more than a high priced ambulance chaser.
Since the speech at the Elipse is a matter of record, his hot defense attorney can introduce any part of it she wishes in her client's defense. And there's nothing Smith can do to stop her.
Yup.No one forced trump to go this route. He did this to himself. As will be revealed during his trial , he and others conspired in an organized effort with militia leaders ( most already convicted ) in sedition. Fortunately the sane people on the other side did not overreact to this sad futile attempt to destroy our country. If they had an there was a lot of bloodshed ( as trump had hoped / no concern for his followers he put in harm's way ) trump could have declared martial law and achieved his goal of dictatorship.
All your article says is that judges, because they were told there was no fraud, dismissed the cases.The difference between your story and mine is, I actually looked why his hearings were all dismissed. You just have your head up trump’s ass. Now tell us where Trumps evidence is hiding. Where is it BS artist. Where ?
They refused because the offer was fishy , trump wanted greater numbers for greater violence and loss of life. Then he could declare martial law and remain president , fabricating other events to stay in power. He admired despots so much he thought America would be better off with a dictator.As usual, you are confused.
NO ONE has argued that Trump ordered NG. He did, as multiple sources state, offer the NG. And Pelosi and the idiot mayor of DC refused.
NG must be requested. Trump offered NG, they refused to request them.
