- Banned
- #21
Why would ANY intelligent American go to the middle east?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Americans really shouldn't be in Iran. There's a 'Cold War' goin on. Iran has every right to believe that most Americans there, are US spies. Because it's probably true. The US/West and Saudi Arabia are desperately trying to destabilize Iran. I'm sure there are currently numerous US/West spies there.
But the payment was still not a ransom. It was money Iran was legally entitled to.
Again, tell that to Iran, who declared it WAS a ransom and who is now rounding up more hostages, and the other nations/groups that now 'know' America pays ransoms.
No ransom was paid. Stop lying.
Ransom WAS paid, and interest that was not owed. Obama wanted to provide support.
Nice OPINION...but it really doesn't matter what you THINK. Iran believes - and has declared - America paid a ransom. As a result they are kidnapping/arresting more Americans to use as hostages to hold for more ransom.No ransom was paid. Stop lying.
See if you can refute this point by point:
Why the $400 Million Wasn’t Ransom
The deal’s defenders insist that the financial negotiations were totally separate from both the nuclear deal and the hostage talks, and were led by three separate teams. It’s impossible to verify or refute that information.
A stronger argument is that the U.S. had to make a big payment to Iran because of a 35-year-old deal for weapons that were never received. It wasn’t a matter of if, but when and how much. Washington was worried that the tribunal would impose a payment of several billion dollars, as Tehran demanded, and grabbed the opportunity to settle for the $1.7 billion as part of a overall pact at the same time Iran was benefiting from the nuclear agreement.
It’s also reasonable to ask why Iran would release hostages in exchange for $400 million, when—according to the deal’s defenders—it was bound to get at least that amount from the Hague anyway, and could keep the hostages to boot. Of course, it’s impossible to verify if Tehran was truly convinced a bigger, though later, settlement was likely. Still, it’s clear that the payout from the $400 million dispute was coming, and would happen with or without a release of hostages.
“This was not a quid pro quo for hostages,” saysBarbara Slavin, acting director of the Future of Iran Initiative at the Atlantic Council. “It was an opportunity for countries with no diplomatic relations to clear away a number of diplomatic disputes. For the U.S, it was important to get back the detained Americans, and the Iranians wanted their seven citizens out of jail.”
Slavin adds that most of the recent coverage of the U.S.-Iran dealings ignores the importance of the prisoner exchange.
According to Sick: “It was all taken care of at the same time, through separate channels. It was a good deal for U.S. taxpayers, the U.S. obeyed the law, and the payment was always going to happen anyway.”
5 Things You Need to Know About the $400 Million America Sent to Iran
No ransom was paid. Stop lying.
Ransom WAS paid, and interest that was not owed. Obama wanted to provide support.
How many times would you have to be told that this was Iran's money in the first place, money they paid for goods they never received,
before it would get through your thick skull?
As the old saying goes, 'Perception is reality'.Iranian propaganda is the Gospel to you? lol.
As the old saying goes, 'Perception is reality'.
Any American citizen dumb enough
People's minds had to be changed. When you convince Iran and the rest of the world this was not a ransom, invite me to your 'victory' party!Exactly, that's why the Earth was flat, but then inflated into a sphere as perceptions changed.
Any American citizen dumb enough
These are NOT "Americans." They are Israelis with token US citizenship because this is yet another attempt by Zionism to provoke a US war with an enemy of Israel.
Same program, different channel.
I disagree. That money should have been distributed decades ago among the hostages and their families for damages incurred in 1979.
Spoils of war, a policy we should probably adopt.
As to the "interest" paid, we aren't a fucking savings bank. They were due no interest whatsoever.
I disagree. That money should have been distributed decades ago among the hostages and their families for damages incurred in 1979.
Spoils of war, a policy we should probably adopt.
As to the "interest" paid, we aren't a fucking savings bank. They were due no interest whatsoever.
One last fucking time on this issue based on stupid and ignorant "conclusions" by right wingers.....
When REAGAN got our hostages back from Iran in 1981, the US agreed to a decision to be rendered by 9 judges (3 US, 3 Iranians and 3 neutral) as to what to do with the $400 million that Iran had ALREADY paid to the US for weaponry.
The case was due to be settled in early 2016 and the US well-knew that she would lose and Iran would actually be awarded by this panel of judges at a tune of many billions of dollars (because of the interest)....
The US (Obama) decided to settle for a much smaller amount about 1/10th of what Iran would have won with this panel.
Hey Billy, give us the "names" of these "Americans...."