As a Trump Appointed Federal Judge, Fernando Rodriguez Jr., Has Use of the Alien nemies Act As a Vehicle To Deport Venezuelan Nationals What Now?

[struth]

Garcia's in El Salvador and there's jackshit anyone can do about it except Bukele and he's not so inclined. I suppose Trump could invade El Salvador to free Garcia, but I don't see that happening. He is where he belongs.

Invasion to kidnap the illegal terrorist is what the Dems are basically campaigning on now

 

[Care4all]

Garcia's in El Salvador and there's jackshit anyone can do about it except Bukele and he's not so inclined. I suppose Trump could invade El Salvador to free Garcia, but I don't see that happening. He is where he belongs.

Bukele will do anything Trump asks him to do. To pretend like he wouldn't return him if actually asked by Trump, is simply mouthing trump rhetoric and untrue. According to the ElSalvadoran Vice President, they are only holding Garcia, because in an arrangement, the USA is PAYING ElSalvador to hold him and other prisoners.

And Trump said in a tv news media interview that Bukele would return him, if he asked him to....it's on tape.

 

[Care4all]

Actually if you read the orders, they found it credible he was in a gang, likewise they found his fears of a rival gang retaliation credible too, thus they withheld deporting him at the time to El Salvador but deportable anywhere else

he decided not to find another country to move to over the past 6 years, and instead continued his gang life, a gang that is now a terrorist organization.

And the rival gang is no longer a threat.

There was no rival gang retaliation involved in him being given protection. Stop spreading the Trumper created lies. Read the court decisions.

 

[Meathead]

Bukele will do anything Trump asks him to do. To pretend like he wouldn't return him if actually asked by Trump, is simply mouthing trump rhetoric and untrue. According to the ElSalvadoran Vice President, they are only holding Garcia, because in an arrangement, the USA is PAYING ElSalvador to hold him and other prisoners.

And Trump said in a tv news media interview that Bukele would return him, if he asked him to....it's on tape.

I'm sure Trump asked Bukele with a nudge and a wink. I can only imagine how upset Trump was when he was denied.

 

[struth]

There was no rival gang retaliation involved in him being given protection. Stop spreading the Trumper created lies. Read the court decisions.

Read the order that’s what the judge said…of course he called “gangs”. “Social groups” but we all know nobody has a credible fear of a social group that’s not a violent gang

 

[scruffy]

Without due process, anyone can be deported by this admin, Citizens, non citizens...with just their claim of yahdahdahdahdahdah...

(I know you don't live here)

You should stop listening to CNN. Turn off MS-LSD and the rest of the bullshit MSM.

Everyone gets due process.

If you're a member of a terrorist organization, you get deported. That's due process. That's what the law says.

Until Congress decides otherwise, the Executive Branch is in charge of all immigration matters and all national security matters. That is due process under the law.

 

[jknowgood]

WASHINGTON — A federal judge appointed by President Donald Trump on Thursday rejected the Trump administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport Venezuelans it alleges are members of the criminal organization Tren de Aragua.

Trump-appointed federal judge rejects use of Alien Enemies Act in Venezuelan deportations

The ruling was the first time a judge weighed in on the merits of Trump's invocation of the wartime authority granted in 1798.

www.nbcnews.com

U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr., of the Southern District of Texas, wrote in an opinion that he does not question the executive branch’s authority to direct the detention and removal of aliens who engage in criminal activity, and he noted the administration can continue to rely on the Immigration and Nationality Act for those proceedings.

But Rodriguez, who was nominated in Trump's first term, wrote that the question at the center of the lawsuit was whether Trump could use the Alien Enemies Act to detain and remove Venezuelans who were members of Tren de Aragua, and he argued that "the historical record renders clear that the President’s invocation of the AEA through the Proclamation exceeds the scope of the statute and is contrary to the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute’s terms."

The United States is not now at war with Venezuela. The United States declared war since December 7, 1941. He does not that authority, he never had that authority. We are NOT with El Salvador either. Deportations to that nation are totally illegal.

 

[jknowgood]

Without due process, anyone can be deported by this admin, Citizens, non citizens...with just their claim of yahdahdahdahdahdah...

(I know you don't live here)

No just illegals.

 

[Care4all]

If you're a member of a terrorist organization, you get deported. That's due process. That's what the law says

Nope! How do you know they are a terrorist as fact, without a hearing by a neutral arbitrator, (judge) hearing both side's evidence?

You know, the only way to catch mistakes before they happen, is for some form of DUE process by a judge overseeing, to take place...

I think the admin is up to 5 mistakes with people wrongly accused and disappeared in the US. by the admin and in to the ElSalvadoran torture prison....all now working their way through the courts, finally...

 

[White 6]

Trump took advice from Mitch O'Connell and others. There is more to this. We know Joe was not even cognizant most of the time and we sure would like to know who was signing his EO's and legislation if needed. Progs would have had the person or persons in prison already. Not us.

Joe was not and is not involved in Donny's attempt to use Alien Enemies Act.
"Not us."? I was not aware you were headed to prison. When is your report date?

 

[struth]

Nope! How do you know they are a terrorist as fact, without a hearing by a neutral arbitrator, (judge) hearing both side's evidence?

You know, the only way to catch mistakes before they happen, is for some form of DUE process by a judge overseeing, to take place...

I think the admin is up to 5 mistakes with people wrongly accused and disappeared in the US. by the admin and in to the ElSalvadoran torture prison....all now working their way through the courts, finally...

There are ways terrorist organizations can challenge their designation.

Until they do and win, then there members are in fact terrorist

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

View attachment 1107384

Why are you the only one talking about it.

 

[0311]

Deport you, problem solved!

Deport all MAGA MAGGOTS. Send to their land of Milk and Honey.....which is Russia.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Dimocrats hoping and praying that judges will help them keep the millions of third-worlders that Joe Biden invited to flood in.
They will do everything in their power to not lose them.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Deport all MAGA MAGGOTS. Send to their land of Milk and Honey.....which is Russia.

Send all Dimocrat maggots (you first) to your utopia of China.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Send all Dimocrat maggots (you first) to your utopia of China.

Once you are in Russia.

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 1107384

The statement is partially true. The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) did not eliminate the need for a hearing before deportation for everyone, but it did create new streamlined deportation processes that can bypass a full hearing in some cases.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

1. Expedited Removal:

• IIRIRA introduced expedited removal, allowing immigration officers to summarily remove certain noncitizens without a hearing before an immigration judge.
  
  
• This process applies to individuals who are inadmissible, such as those lacking valid entry documents or those who entered the U.S. without being admitted or paroled and have been in the country for less than two years.
  
  
• Expedited removal is not reviewable by an immigration judge and has limited options for relief.
  
  
• However, if an individual claims a "credible fear" of persecution, they are entitled to an individualized interview to determine if they should proceed with a full removal hearing before an immigration judge.
  

2. Stipulated Removal:

• IIRIRA also created stipulated removal, where noncitizens can voluntarily agree to their deportation without appearing before an immigration judge.
• These individuals are often advised of their rights and presented with forms to sign, sometimes without the assistance of an attorney.
• They essentially give up their right to a full hearing in exchange for a faster and less adversarial process.
  

3. Mandatory Deportation:

• The 1996 laws also made it easier to deport noncitizens, particularly those convicted of certain crimes, by removing discretion from immigration judges and other officials.
  
  
• This meant that individuals who might have otherwise been eligible for relief under previous laws were now subject to mandatory deportation.
  
  
• For example, a noncitizen convicted of an aggravated felony could not apply for withholding of removal, which would have previously protected them from deportation.
  

4. Reinstatement of Removal:

• IIRIRA also created a provision for reinstatement of removal, allowing immigration authorities to deport any individual who illegally re-entered the U.S. after being deported, regardless of their subsequent eligibility for relief.
• This process eliminated the need for a hearing for those who had been previously deported and then illegally returned to the U.S.
  

• Expedited Removal Explainer | American Immigration Council
  Feb 20, 2025 — Expedited removal is a process by which low-level immigration officers can summarily remove certain noncitizens from t...
  
  
  
  American Immigration Council
  
  
  
  
  
  
• The Growth of Summary Deportations from the United States
  Apr 28, 2014 — In 1996, as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), Congress established str...
  
  
  
  American Immigration Council
  
  
  
  
  
  
• Deportation Without a Hearing: A Primer
  Jul 6, 2017 — The expedited process is not reviewable by an immigration judge and has only extremely limited options for relief. For ...
  
  
  
  Bipartisan Policy Center
  
  
  
  
  
  
• Show all

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Once you are in Russia.

I don't want anything to do with Russia. I will stay here, you need to go.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

The statement is partially true. The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) did not eliminate the need for a hearing before deportation for everyone, but it did create new streamlined deportation processes that can bypass a full hearing in some cases.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

1. Expedited Removal:

• IIRIRA introduced expedited removal, allowing immigration officers to summarily remove certain noncitizens without a hearing before an immigration judge.
  
  
• This process applies to individuals who are inadmissible, such as those lacking valid entry documents or those who entered the U.S. without being admitted or paroled and have been in the country for less than two years.
  
  
• Expedited removal is not reviewable by an immigration judge and has limited options for relief.
  
  
• However, if an individual claims a "credible fear" of persecution, they are entitled to an individualized interview to determine if they should proceed with a full removal hearing before an immigration judge.

2. Stipulated Removal:

• IIRIRA also created stipulated removal, where noncitizens can voluntarily agree to their deportation without appearing before an immigration judge.
• These individuals are often advised of their rights and presented with forms to sign, sometimes without the assistance of an attorney.
• They essentially give up their right to a full hearing in exchange for a faster and less adversarial process.

3. Mandatory Deportation:

• The 1996 laws also made it easier to deport noncitizens, particularly those convicted of certain crimes, by removing discretion from immigration judges and other officials.
  
  
• This meant that individuals who might have otherwise been eligible for relief under previous laws were now subject to mandatory deportation.
  
  
• For example, a noncitizen convicted of an aggravated felony could not apply for withholding of removal, which would have previously protected them from deportation.

4. Reinstatement of Removal:

• IIRIRA also created a provision for reinstatement of removal, allowing immigration authorities to deport any individual who illegally re-entered the U.S. after being deported, regardless of their subsequent eligibility for relief.
• This process eliminated the need for a hearing for those who had been previously deported and then illegally returned to the U.S.

• Expedited Removal Explainer | American Immigration Council
  Feb 20, 2025 — Expedited removal is a process by which low-level immigration officers can summarily remove certain noncitizens from t...
  View attachment 1107473
  American Immigration Council
  
  View attachment 1107474
  
  
• The Growth of Summary Deportations from the United States
  Apr 28, 2014 — In 1996, as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), Congress established str...
  View attachment 1107478
  American Immigration Council
  
  View attachment 1107475
  
  
• Deportation Without a Hearing: A Primer
  Jul 6, 2017 — The expedited process is not reviewable by an immigration judge and has only extremely limited options for relief. For ...
  View attachment 1107476
  Bipartisan Policy Center
  
  View attachment 1107477
  
  
• Show all

Bill Clinton and Obama deported millions, there is not a chance in hell that all of them received a 'due process'. You guys were ok with it then, today since it's Trump, and he told you to NEVER jump out of an airplane, you guys would be lining up to do it.

 

[Moonglow]

Send all Dimocrat maggots (you first) to your utopia of China.

That place is fer MAGATS.
Yer butt buddy Elon does billions of dollars of production in China and Trump: