No, it's not. The difference between liberty and freedom, a complexity that is also used to control low IQs in America, is embedded in the "choice" of the preposition, which is not choice but a mandate.
A choice of (types of mental illness many call religion [italics]) is no choice. That is why Putin knows and has said, that religion is absolutely necessary. That is why Lincoln may have written a book denouncing the bible, but according to Herndon, a friend talked him out of it, thereby ensuring Lincoln's political future (Seidel, p. 112).
'The phrases founders, founding fathers, and framers are loaded terms, but are difficult to avoid when writing a book of this kind....Who qualifies to rank among the founders? Does the pantheon include everyone who signed a founding document? If so, which document or documents?
The Declaration of Independence or the Constitution? Only six men signed both. What about the Articles of Confederation? What about the people who were present for the debates on these documents but who did not sign or who refused to sign? What about those who had an important contribution and impact, like Thomas Paine, but who neither debated nor signed?
Should greater weight be given those who were more instrumental - for instance James Madison, who wrote most of the Constitution, defended it in The Federalist Papers, and was the force behind the Bill of Rights? What about someone like Vice President Aaron Burr, who was an active politician and altered our history, but contributed less to the development of ideas and the debates that shaped our country?
....So please do not abandon reason when reading that term in this book. Assume that I'm referring to the major founders or the majority of the founders, and by all means, disagree with me.'
(Seidel, The Founding Myth, p. 23)
