Article 51 of the Geneva Convention

[g5000]

it's the same threat for Iran leaders to promote death to americans and building nukes they weren't allowed to build. How's it different?

"Death to America" is theater for the rubes. It's for internal consumption.

Like "Make America Great Again" for rubes who have the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.

 

[g5000]

How does it feel, rubes, that Trump has made you into the very neocons you used to sneer about?

 

[IM2]

^^^ new forum name is PutridScum2 after he licked the boots of Iran and bashed America.

Your kind is why our country is in this huge mess.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Tell me how you would feel about a country that did this to America, you ignorant MAGAT piece of hillbilly trash.

 

[Nostra]

The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:

1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf

Military uses them, just like when Clinton and Barry Hussein bombed them, IQ2.

Next dumbass talking point you have been fed?

 

[Muhammed]

The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:

1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf

#6 is being violated by Iran when they use human shields around power plants.

 

[Muhammed]

What about when the iranian occult guard gunned down and murdered over 70,000 citizens in the streets?

That would be a violation of #5.

 

[jc456]

Your kind is why our country is in this huge mess.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Tell me how you would feel about a country that did this to America, you ignorant MAGAT piece of hillbilly trash.

What is the mess again?

 

[Nostra]

That would be a violation of #5.

What about throwing gays off buildings?

 

[jackflash]

The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:

1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf

In islamo land there are no civilians as all islamos(men/women/children) are expected to be soldiers for moon god allah.

 

[22lcidw]

Your kind is why our country is in this huge mess.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Tell me how you would feel about a country that did this to America, you ignorant MAGAT piece of hillbilly trash.

When Islamic people get enough power here, many citizens are going to be in for a surprise or act like it is a surprise.

 

[IM2]

Taking out electricity to limit an enemies ability to produce more weapons and bridges to prevent a military from resupplying are legitimate military targets. Iran intentionally targets civilians in other countries and uses them as shields in their own, yet I don't see you criticizing them. Perhaps you should get your priorities in order.

.

Spare me your autodefense of anything Trump does. My priorities are just fine. I oppose starting wars for no ******* reason.

READ THIS before you even try telling me about my priorities.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Not one of you MAGATS would tolerate THIS. You would be demanding nuclear attacks on whoever did it. But you, sorry ignorant bottom of the barrel, lowest white pieces of crap cannot understand how Iran could chant "Death to America" after we installed a man who oppressed his people and got rich on their misery. I mean, you white right-wingers are truly some arrogant motherfuckers.

 

[IM2]

What is the mess again?

This war, our economy, the Epstein files, and the administration's policies in total.

 

[JustAGuy1]

So is removing a democratically elected government and installing a leader who rules as an autocrat, oppressing his people, causing a revolution as we did in Iran. So GFY, you no good American-hating right-wing bigoted piece of trash.

Stop pretending be tough Isaac, you can't fix the fact that you have a little dick.

 

[IM2]

In islamo land there are no civilians as all islamos(men/women/children) are expected to be soldiers for moon god allah.

Bulshit. STFU.

 

[Nostra]

Spare me your autodefense of anything Trump does. My priorities are just fine. I oppose starting wars for no ******* reason.

READ THIS before you even try telling me about my priorities.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Not one of you MAGATS would tolerate THIS. You would be demanding nuclear attacks on whoever did it. But you, sorry ignorant bottom of the barrel, lowest white pieces of crap cannot understand how Iran could chant "Death to America" after we installed a man who oppressed his people and got rich on their misery. I mean, you white right-wingers are truly some arrogant motherfuckers.

We had plenty of reasons to attack, Gomer.






.

 

[Muhammed]

Your kind is why our country is in this huge mess.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Tell me how you would feel about a country that did this to America, you ignorant MAGAT piece of hillbilly trash.

That's nothing but communist propaganda meant to influence morons. It only works on morons like you, ginger boy..

FACT = There was no coup against Mossadegh. He was fired because he caused immense suffering to the Iranian people and destroyed the economy.

 

[jc456]

This war, our economy, the Epstein files, and the administration's policies in total.

What is messy?

 

[OKTexas]

Spare me your autodefense of anything Trump does. My priorities are just fine. I oppose starting wars for no ******* reason.

READ THIS before you even try telling me about my priorities.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Not one of you MAGATS would tolerate THIS. You would be demanding nuclear attacks on whoever did it. But you, sorry ignorant bottom of the barrel, lowest white pieces of crap cannot understand how Iran could chant "Death to America" after we installed a man who oppressed his people and got rich on their misery. I mean, you white right-wingers are truly some arrogant motherfuckers.

I just explained what legitimate military objectives are, I guess you can't understand since you've never served.

.

 

[IM2]

I just explained what legitimate military objectives are, I guess you can't understand since you've never served.

.

I understand that a legitimate military objective is not to obey an illegal order. You have never fought for what is right here in America. I have. You have fought for corporations. So you can go take your miitay objectice and shove them up your ---. What Trump threatened violated Article 51 of the Geneva Convention.

 

[Auld Phart]

What about throwing gays off buildings?

entertainment?