Arrests Happening for Church Rioters

Good luck. Should be an interesting case considering what can and can't be considered first amendment rights.

Trump's DoJ isn't exactly brimming with competent prosecutors.
Walking into a church is not a first amendment right. The church is private property. Blocking traffic, blocking entrances are all illegal. Protesting is a first amendment right but not on private property. The J6 protests have a stronger right than this group.
 
Has already been provided in the thread.

Their convictions were wiped away by Trump’s pardon.
Bull freakin shit! You threw that out there, then since have refused to provide ANY proof of such...You lying POS....You think because you say it, it becomes fact?

Give us the names or be branded a liar....AGAIN!
 
Some mere magistrate judge thinks he can direct that the DOJ not arrest Don Lemon.


It will be interesting to see if this judicial interference gets appealed.

The judicial branch is looking like a complete joke
 
No it's not, it's a clear violation of federal law and FACE Act

You're being deliberately obtuse
Not entirely clear. FACE is mostly concerned with people blocking access (as was happening in the abortion clinics that I pointed out) and using threats or force.

They might be able to be prosecuted under the FACE act, but they didn’t barricade doors and as far as I can tell haven’t been threatening people but I haven’t seen everything.
 
Not entirely clear. FACE is mostly concerned with people blocking access (as was happening in the abortion clinics that I pointed out) and using threats or force.

They might be able to be prosecuted under the FACE act, but they didn’t barricade doors and as far as I can tell haven’t been threatening people but I haven’t seen everything.

Nobody is buying your bs dude
 
Walking into a church is not a first amendment right. The church is private property. Blocking traffic, blocking entrances are all illegal. Protesting is a first amendment right but not on private property. The J6 protests have a stronger right than this group.
It's open to the public, so it's not like they're immediately trespassing just by walking in. But again, trespassing isn't a federal charge.
 
It’s open to the public, and they’re free to trespass them.

But that’s not a federal charge.

Breaking and entering is stupid.

"Open to the public" does not mean the private business/church has no right to kick you out if you're disruptive. Hello?

The federal charge is FACE law 3. If MN was actually a lawful state, they would also be charged with trespassing, etc.
 
15th post
"Open to the public" does not mean the private business/church has no right to kick you out if you're disruptive. Hello?
I never said otherwise. But this isn't about trespassing.
The federal charge is FACE law 3. If MN was actually a lawful state, they would also be charged with trespassing, etc.
Maybe, maybe not. These protestors did less than the protestors in at the abortion clinics that Trump pardoned.
 
Apparently the judicial activism has begun.


This 'judge' thinks you can use the 1st Amendment to trample on the 1st Amendment. Absolute lunacy.

It's not even a first amendment issue so much as it's trespassing. When you've been asked to leave and you don't it's trespassing.
 
Back
Top Bottom