Arrests Happening for Church Rioters

Matters not. Facts don’t care about your feelings.
In Minnesota, a terroristic threat is defined under Statute 609.713, which criminalizes threats of violence intended to terrorize another person or cause public inconvenience.

25 CFR § 11.402

Terroristic​

The Federal statute defining terroristic threats is outlined in 25 CFR § 11.402. This statute states that a person is guilty of a misdemeanor if they threaten to commit any crime of violence with the purpose to terrorize another...

Care to try again?
ICE executing warrantless searches, arresting people without probable cause, assaulting individuals exercising first amendment rights, racially profiling minorities and detaining them without reasonable suspicion.
That is totally incorrect....

Removal Process​

As part of its mission, ERO removes individuals from the U.S. who are subject to final orders of removal, which may be issued by an immigration judge within the Department of Justice (DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) or through other administrative means.


So, what we see happening here, and leftists like you are obstructing unlawfully, is that these ICE teams are going to specific locations where an individual named in a specific order of removal are. Now, if there are other illegals there at the time of arrest, than they will be picked up as well, and taken in for their hearings...

As for the protesters being arrested, they are breaking federal law with their actions, and can be prosecuted under federal law....And I for one hope they are....
 
The DoJ is doing their job by arresting these people....Clearly laid out in the indictment...

Now, considering how progressives have corrupted our judicial system with judges ruling on their ideological feelings instead of the law, we will have to wait and see....
Apparently the judicial activism has begun.


This 'judge' thinks you can use the 1st Amendment to trample on the 1st Amendment. Absolute lunacy.
 
In Minnesota, a terroristic threat is defined under Statute 609.713, which criminalizes threats of violence intended to terrorize another person or cause public inconvenience.

25 CFR § 11.402

Terroristic​

The Federal statute defining terroristic threats is outlined in 25 CFR § 11.402. This statute states that a person is guilty of a misdemeanor if they threaten to commit any crime of violence with the purpose to terrorize another...

Care to try again?

That is totally incorrect....

Removal Process​

As part of its mission, ERO removes individuals from the U.S. who are subject to final orders of removal, which may be issued by an immigration judge within the Department of Justice (DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) or through other administrative means.


So, what we see happening here, and leftists like you are obstructing unlawfully, is that these ICE teams are going to specific locations where an individual named in a specific order of removal are. Now, if there are other illegals there at the time of arrest, than they will be picked up as well, and taken in for their hearings...

As for the protesters being arrested, they are breaking federal law with their actions, and can be prosecuted under federal law....And I for one hope they are....
You’re totally ignorant of what’s going on and you choose to remain as such.

Examples are plentiful:


 
Apparently the judicial activism has begun.


This 'judge' thinks you can use the 1st Amendment to trample on the 1st Amendment. Absolute lunacy.
If Bondi is intent, she will get an indictment anyway....A Magistrate is probably the lowest in the line of appeal....But, I take your point....and agree, our judicial system needs to be seriously looked at for partisan bias on the bench, and rooted out.
 
FACE ACT violation....It has shit-all to do with the 1st.
When the entirety of the illegal conduct boils down to their speech, you may intersect with the 1st amendment.
 
You’re totally ignorant of what’s going on and you choose to remain as such.

Examples are plentiful:


Are you seriously trying to give me three left wing articles from The Hill, Common Dreams (for Christ sake), and CNN?

Man GTFOH....You've lost this argument before you even started....
 
You’re totally ignorant of what’s going on and you choose to remain as such.

Examples are plentiful:


.

Blogs that don't mean squat.






.
 
Give an example of right wingers physically obstructing an abortion clinic.
Has already been provided in the thread.

Their convictions were wiped away by Trump’s pardon.
 
15th post
Are you suggesting all places open to the public are susceptible to protests inside of the establishment?
Individuals can be trespassed, for sure. That’s not what’s going on here.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom