Arrest these people

[ChristisKing]

The ones about securing our borders and reducing crime come to mind.

No wonder I suddenly got a taste for tacos.

You cannot put American citizens in GTMO because it is in a foreign country. Technically, you would be deporting them. That is why we kept the terrorists locked up there instead of in the US.

Since when are ILLEGAL immigrants American citizens?

Greene has always stood up for women

Yeah but not she's standing up for the party who don't know what a woman is.

Um...retard?

These patriots are asking our military to ignore unlawful orders.

As a retired vet, I well remember the extensive training we received about unlawful orders.

Idiot.

.

It's unlawful to get people out of our country who are here illegally?

 

[Winco]

Biden is the one that sexually assaulted his own daughter, didn't hear you condemn it.

That's simply because you have trump like reading and comprehension skills.

JFC, trump is the worst POTUS ever.
History will be very unkind for this man.

"No, I don't take ANY responsibility at all." djt

 

[Winco]

Yeah but not she's standing up for the party who don't know what a woman is.

Just stop b&)#*&$.
Dear Lord.

 

[Lesh]

What were the Nuremberg trials about?

Asking for a friend

 

[IM2]

Wrong as usual.

 

[Lockback]

Wrong as usual.

Jeffries would never do anything wrong because he's BLACK.
Right?

 

[martybegan]

Weird, because I'm leaning more on the side of WHOEVER is on the Epstein List and WHOEVER is covering it up.............

Those ^^^^^^^ are the true SCUM.

But I constantly see your point, protect the pedos ........................................... but WHY?

 

[IM2]

Jeffries would never do anything wrong because he's BLACK.
Right?

No. You would be very wise not to start ranting on things that come from James Comer. This is the guy who swore Biden was crooked, but every bit of evidence he showed proved that everything he claimed was a lie.

Hakeem Jeffries responds to Jeffrey Epstein email revelations​

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has responded after his name allegedly appeared in a 2013 email sent to Jeffrey Epstein.

Jeffries faced fresh scrutiny after House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer pointed to the email—which Epstein received from a political consulting firm, Dynamic SRG, promoting a fundraiser linked to the congressman.

Newsweek has contacted Dynamic SRG and Jeffries for comment via email sent outside regular working hours.

The message, which asked recipients to contact the firm if they were interested in attending a fundraising dinner or getting to “know Hakeem better,” was not authored or sent by Jeffries himself.

The document does not show evidence of Jeffries meeting Epstein or of Epstein donating in response to the solicitation. It is also unclear if Epstein responded to the email. There is no suggestion Jeffries was aware the email was being sent or to whom it would go.

MSN

You believe every lie coming from Republicans. YOU are the one who believes whites are perfect. That whites never do wrong. So don't project yourself on me, chump.

 

[Lockback]

No. You would be very wise not to start ranting on things that come from James Comer. This is the guy who swore Biden was crooked, but every bit of evidence he showed proved that everything he claimed was a lie.

Hakeem Jeffries responds to Jeffrey Epstein email revelations​

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has responded after his name allegedly appeared in a 2013 email sent to Jeffrey Epstein.

Jeffries faced fresh scrutiny after House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer pointed to the email—which Epstein received from a political consulting firm, Dynamic SRG, promoting a fundraiser linked to the congressman.

Newsweek has contacted Dynamic SRG and Jeffries for comment via email sent outside regular working hours.

The message, which asked recipients to contact the firm if they were interested in attending a fundraising dinner or getting to “know Hakeem better,” was not authored or sent by Jeffries himself.

The document does not show evidence of Jeffries meeting Epstein or of Epstein donating in response to the solicitation. It is also unclear if Epstein responded to the email. There is no suggestion Jeffries was aware the email was being sent or to whom it would go.

MSN

You believe every lie coming from Republicans. YOU are the one who believes whites are perfect. That whites never do wrong. So don't project yourself on me, chump.

Hee hee ... just open up and pour more racism into the country. That's the way you make things better!

 

[jknowgood]

That's simply because you have trump like reading and comprehension skills.

JFC, trump is the worst POTUS ever.
History will be very unkind for this man.

"No, I don't take ANY responsibility at all." djt

What does that have to do with Biden sexually abusing his own daughter? Trump is doing what he said he would do. His first 9 months has been incredible, if it wasn't. You loons wouldn't be freaking out about it.

 

[Delldude]

No. You would be very wise not to start ranting on things that come from James Comer. This is the guy who swore Biden was crooked, but every bit of evidence he showed proved that everything he claimed was a lie.

Why were criminal referrals sent to DOJ then? Beyond that, why did Biden give preemptive blanket pardons to all involved then?

******* DUH.

There is no suggestion Jeffries was aware the email was being sent or to whom it would go.

It was his staff who arrange and set up his social events.
He's obviously lying.

 

[debbiedowner]

Sounds rather insurrectiony. Send em to the gulag, they aren't fit to serve

I See X left out illegal orders. That is what they said.

FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders - Military Law Task Force

This FAQ (drafted by members of the MLTF) can also be found in printable PDF format here: Illegal Orders FAQ – 11NOV2025 DoD Instruction 1325.06 permits a servicemember to possess a single copy of this document. FAQs on refusing illegal orders Version 2 – released November 11, 2025 Do I have...

nlgmltf.org

OP never been in the military I see as you do not have to obey an illegal order.

1. Do I have the right to refuse illegal orders?

1. Yes! All members of the military have the right, and in some cases have the duty, to refuse illegal orders. Your oath is to the Constitution (which incorporates international treaties ratified by the U.S. on human rights and the law of war), not to the Commander-In-Chief or to any other individual in the chain of command.

 

[debbiedowner]

I notice there is no mention of which orders they’re supposed to ignore.

There is in the original text which op and x left out. It was illegal orders.

 

[martybegan]

There is in the original text which op and x left out. It was illegal orders.

Progs think any order given by Trump is an illegal order. Without definition it's meaningless coming from twats like you.

 

[Delldude]

OP never been in the military I see as you do not have to obey an illegal order.

But you have to prove it was illegal....

 

[Care4all]

Time to charge people with sedition and treason. Lock them up and throw away the keys.

You can't. Because they used the term illegal and unconstitutional orders... Which the military takes an oath to....

They did not encourage defying orders, but defying illegal orders or unconstitutional orders when presented to the military, which they are sworn under oath, to do....thus the congress critters... can't be gotten on sedition or treason.

 

[westwall]

You can't. Because they used the term illegal and unconstitutional orders... Which the military takes an oath to....

They did not encourage defying orders, but defying illegal orders or unconstitutional orders when presented to the military, which they are sworn under oath, to do....thus the congress critters... can't be gotten on sedition or treason.

There is nothing Trump has ordered that is unconstitutional.

 

[Delldude]

You can't. Because they used the term illegal and unconstitutional orders... Which the military takes an oath to....

They did not encourage defying orders, but defying illegal orders or unconstitutional orders when presented to the military, which they are sworn under oath, to do....thus the congress critters... can't be gotten on sedition or treason.

Leaving the stooges that make a determination that Trump's orders are unconstitutional from Clowns like you screaming that on the Internet.

Genius

 

[norwegen]

Since when do Democrats care about the Constitution?

To them, it's a living document, so, you know, up for interpretation.

Their little bobbleheads can bobble right off their shoulders for all I care. They're useless, anyway.

 

[Rawley]

Those people are scum, pure and simple.

You have to ask - they thought this was a good idea?