Arizona court fines failed GOP candidate Kari Lake's lawyers for "unequivocally false" claim

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Well..color me surprised.....NOT!

MSN

www.msn.com

The Arizona Supreme Court ordered defeated GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's attorneys pay $2,000 in sanctions for making an "unequivocally false" claim that more than 35,000 ballots were "injected" into Maricopa County's total after the election.

 

[theHawk]

Well..color me surprised.....NOT!

MSN

www.msn.com

The Arizona Supreme Court ordered defeated GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's attorneys pay $2,000 in sanctions for making an "unequivocally false" claim that more than 35,000 ballots were "injected" into Maricopa County's total after the election.

The judge did not provide any explanation how the claim was false. The estimate was based on the weight of the shipment, which is what the post office does as it is very accurate.

He also said that they should had disputed the signature process before the election, which is completely absurd.

Another political hack covering up the obvious cheating in AZ.

 

[Augustine_]

The judge did not provide any explanation how the claim was false.

Similar to how Kari Lake's lawyers couldn't provide any explanation how the claim was true

 

[pknopp]

Similar to how Kari Lake's lawyers couldn't provide any explanation how the claim was true

Nor provide any actual evidence.

 

[theHawk]

Similar to how Kari Lake's lawyers couldn't provide any explanation how the claim was true

Yes they did, they showed the weight of the delivery, which is what the post office uses to determine how many envelopes there are in large shipments.

 

[miketx]

Well..color me surprised.....NOT!

MSN

www.msn.com

The Arizona Supreme Court ordered defeated GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's attorneys pay $2,000 in sanctions for making an "unequivocally false" claim that more than 35,000 ballots were "injected" into Maricopa County's total after the election.

Similar to how Kari Lake's lawyers couldn't provide any explanation how the claim was true

Nor provide any actual evidence.