Arizona Attorney General Brnovich Has Done Nothing with Criminal Activities Identified in 2020 Election Audit

[g5000]

Let's go one by one through the Cyber Ninjas list:


23,344 mail-in ballots from prior address:

 

[g5000]

10,342 potential voters that voted in multiple counties.

 

[g5000]

9,041 more ballots returned by voter than received.

 

[g5000]

I don't know why I'm bothering, really. The tards are just gonna go, "NUH-UH!"

And then invent a whole new bullshit claim.

 

[g5000]

3,432 official results do not match who voted.

Arizona 'audit': A multitude of unsubstantiated claims and no proof of fraud

The long-awaited and repeatedly delayed report of the Arizona Senate’s purported "audit" of the election in Maricopa County featured a plethora of unsubstantiated allegations that files were deleted, equipment was improperly connected to the internet, signatures weren’t properly verified and...

www.azmirror.com

Logan said one of the audit’s findings, that 3,432 more ballots were cast than were shown in a file of voters provided by the county, was resolved when election officials explained on Thursday that those voters didn’t show up in the files because their addresses are protected. The addresses of certain voters, such as law enforcement members, judges and domestic violence victims, are kept confidential under state law.

 

[g5000]

Finally, the last "question" on the list: 2,592 more duplicates than original ballots.

'Irresponsible and dangerous': Maricopa County responds to questions raised in Arizona audit

County officials responded to many of the claims as the Cyber Ninjas CEO and others presented their review of the county's 2020 election.

www.azcentral.com

County workers duplicate a ballot when, for some reason, the ballot won't be accepted by the ballot tabulating machine. This could happen if a ballot is torn or stained or for various other reasons.

Cyber Ninjas said it found that the county counted 2,592 more duplicated ballots than it had originally sent to duplication.

The county says it's confident that its duplication process was accurate, especially because this was confirmed in a court case challenging the issue that was eventually dismissed.

 

[Delldude]

All of the "irregularities" found by the inexperienced and ridiculously named Cyber Ninjas were debunked within 24 hours of them posting their results.

Try to catch up.

Debunked by liberal fact checkers?

 

[g5000]

Debunked by liberal fact checkers?

See posts 21 through 26.

Especially post 24.

 

[Delldude]

See posts 21 through 26.

Especially post 24.

Only issue with that is the testimony from World Renowned Forensic Document Analyst Erich Speckin that makes the Maricopa comments rather meaningless.

 

[lennypartiv]

Debunked by liberal fact checkers?

That's how they do it. Someone points out all the "extra" ballots in AZ and liberals come up with some flimsy excuse.

 

[Delldude]

See posts 21 through 26.

Especially post 24.

I did.....not one of your 'factual' links addressed the fact of forensic ballot examination.

Why is that?

 

[g5000]

I did.....not one of your 'factual' links addressed the fact of forensic ballot examination.

Why is that?

Actually, they did.

 

[g5000]

I did.....not one of your 'factual' links addressed the fact of forensic ballot examination.

Why is that?

In other words, "NUH-UH!"

 

[Delldude]

Actually, they did.

Not one of your 'read these posts' addresses forensic examination as was done by World Renowned Forensic Document Analyst Erich Speckin.

 

[g5000]

Not one of your 'read these posts' addresses forensic examination as was done by World Renowned Forensic Document Analyst Erich Speckin.

From the OP link:

In September a group of individuals in Arizona identified thousands of issues related to voters who reportedly voted in the 2020 Election. This group estimated that nearly 300,000 votes in Maricopa County in the 2020 Election were questionable and very possibly fraudulent.


That was the ridiculously named Cyber Ninja audit.

All of the posts I presented to you debunked all of that fraudit's "findings". And even the Ninjas said Biden won and Trump lost. In fact they gave MORE votes to Biden and LESS votes to Trump.

All caught up now?

 

[Delldude]

From the OP link:

In September a group of individuals in Arizona identified thousands of issues related to voters who reportedly voted in the 2020 Election. This group estimated that nearly 300,000 votes in Maricopa County in the 2020 Election were questionable and very possibly fraudulent.


That was the ridiculously named Cyber Ninja audit.

All of the posts I presented to you debunked all of that fraudit's "findings". And even the Ninjas said Biden won and Trump lost. In fact they gave MORE votes to Biden and LESS votes to Trump.

All caught up now?

I like your 'one size fits all' explanation.

No mention of of forensic analysis of some 25,000 ballots.

 

[0311]

Aren't we taxpayers paying him to do his job?

---Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich was given a platter of fraudulent and criminal activities related to the results of the 2020 Election in Arizona. The fact that he has done nothing with this to date is reprehensible. ---

EXCLUSIVE: The Fact that Arizona Attorney General Brnovich Has Done Nothing with Criminal Activities Identified in 2020 Election Audit is REPREHENSIBLE | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich was given a platter of fraudulent and criminal activities related to the results of the 2020 Election in Arizona. The fact that he has done nothing with this to date is reprehensible. Arizona AG Mark Brnovich acts tough. He is happy to show that he knows...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Former Republican Arizona Attorney Mark Brnovich Sat On Report Refuting Trump Election Fraud Claims.

Report: Former Arizona AG sat on records refuting election fraud

Arizona's former attorney general suppressed findings by his investigators who concluded there was no basis for allegations that the 2020 election was marred by widespread fraud, according to documents released

www.tribdem.com

PHOENIX – Arizona's former attorney general suppressed findings by his investigators who concluded there was no basis for allegations that the 2020 election was marred by widespread fraud, according to documents released Wednesday by his successor.

Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes, who took office last month, said the records show the 2020 election “was conducted fairly and accurately by election officials.”

Previous Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican, never released a March 2022 summary of investigative findings, which ruled out most of the fraud claims spread by allies and supporters of former President Donald Trump. Yet a month later, he released an “interim report" that claimed his investigation “revealed serious vulnerabilities that must be addressed and raises questions about the 2020 election in Arizona."