Are you a Boomer? Congratulations, You Won the Economy!

citygator

There is a 25% Tariff to read my posts
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2019
Messages
30,717
Reaction score
25,129
Points
2,790
Location
Charlotte
Congrats Boomers! You win. You have accumulated more stuff than anyone AND you have set up more government perks than anyone according to a new Wall Street Journal article.

Today’s Boomers have tilted the economy towards themselves and saddled younger generations with their debt and payouts and the cost is swallowing the budget.



1771446636321.webp

As of the third quarter of last year, people 70 and over controlled roughly 39% of all equities and mutual funds owned by households, compared with 22% in 2007, according to Federal Reserve data. Their share of net worth—assets minus debts—was 32%, up from 20% two decades earlier.

This is good news: there has never been a better time in America to be old. Yet it also exposes our disjointed national priorities. We keep pouring resources into making the elderly comfortable and happy when the economy’s pressure points lie elsewhere.

The elderly are mostly out of the job market and thus need not worry about being replaced by artificial intelligence. The majority own their homes, often debt-free. Everyone worries about health costs, but the elderly have publicly funded Medicare. None of this is true for the younger generations.

The cost is swallowing the budget. Federal spending on elderly programs has risen from 6.9% of gross domestic product in 2007 to 9.4% last year and will reach 11.3% in a decade, the Congressional Budget Office projects.

That is where the real threat to intergenerational harmony lies. Elderly programs, plus interest, are the primary driver of the gaping budget deficit. By 2032, Social Security will no longer be able to pay full benefits. Fixing the deficit and Social Security requires some combination of higher taxes or lower future benefits, both of which will largely spare today’s elderly. If you think the young are anxious now, just wait.

1771446605162.webp
1771446741922.webp
 
Alas, the party is coming to an end. Per the Budget and Economic Outlook: 2026 to 2036, the next presidential administration will face exhaustion of the OASI trust fund in the final year of their first term and thus bear the responsibility of figuring out how to allocate the necessary Social Security benefit cuts.

Screenshot-2026-02-13-112214.png
 
Congrats Boomers! You win. You have accumulated more stuff than anyone AND you have set up more government perks than anyone according to a new Wall Street Journal article.

Today’s Boomers have tilted the economy towards themselves and saddled younger generations with their debt and payouts and the cost is swallowing the budget.



View attachment 1220613
As of the third quarter of last year, people 70 and over controlled roughly 39% of all equities and mutual funds owned by households, compared with 22% in 2007, according to Federal Reserve data. Their share of net worth—assets minus debts—was 32%, up from 20% two decades earlier.

This is good news: there has never been a better time in America to be old. Yet it also exposes our disjointed national priorities. We keep pouring resources into making the elderly comfortable and happy when the economy’s pressure points lie elsewhere.

The elderly are mostly out of the job market and thus need not worry about being replaced by artificial intelligence. The majority own their homes, often debt-free. Everyone worries about health costs, but the elderly have publicly funded Medicare. None of this is true for the younger generations.

The cost is swallowing the budget. Federal spending on elderly programs has risen from 6.9% of gross domestic product in 2007 to 9.4% last year and will reach 11.3% in a decade, the Congressional Budget Office projects.

That is where the real threat to intergenerational harmony lies. Elderly programs, plus interest, are the primary driver of the gaping budget deficit. By 2032, Social Security will no longer be able to pay full benefits. Fixing the deficit and Social Security requires some combination of higher taxes or lower future benefits, both of which will largely spare today’s elderly. If you think the young are anxious now, just wait.

View attachment 1220612View attachment 1220614

Was debt an issue for you during Biden's term?
 
Congrats Boomers! You win. You have accumulated more stuff than anyone AND you have set up more government perks than anyone according to a new Wall Street Journal article.

Today’s Boomers have tilted the economy towards themselves and saddled younger generations with their debt and payouts and the cost is swallowing the budget.



View attachment 1220613
As of the third quarter of last year, people 70 and over controlled roughly 39% of all equities and mutual funds owned by households, compared with 22% in 2007, according to Federal Reserve data. Their share of net worth—assets minus debts—was 32%, up from 20% two decades earlier.

This is good news: there has never been a better time in America to be old. Yet it also exposes our disjointed national priorities. We keep pouring resources into making the elderly comfortable and happy when the economy’s pressure points lie elsewhere.

The elderly are mostly out of the job market and thus need not worry about being replaced by artificial intelligence. The majority own their homes, often debt-free. Everyone worries about health costs, but the elderly have publicly funded Medicare. None of this is true for the younger generations.

The cost is swallowing the budget. Federal spending on elderly programs has risen from 6.9% of gross domestic product in 2007 to 9.4% last year and will reach 11.3% in a decade, the Congressional Budget Office projects.

That is where the real threat to intergenerational harmony lies. Elderly programs, plus interest, are the primary driver of the gaping budget deficit. By 2032, Social Security will no longer be able to pay full benefits. Fixing the deficit and Social Security requires some combination of higher taxes or lower future benefits, both of which will largely spare today’s elderly. If you think the young are anxious now, just wait.

View attachment 1220612View attachment 1220614
Someday you will be elderly. Good luck.
 
Alas, the party is coming to an end. Per the Budget and Economic Outlook: 2026 to 2036, the next presidential administration will face exhaustion of the OASI trust fund in the final year of their first term and thus bear the responsibility of figuring out how to allocate the necessary Social Security benefit cuts.

Screenshot-2026-02-13-112214.png
Yep... the Boomers drained all the resources so that... shockingly... they are only funded through their lives. Boomers are leaving a turd on the rest of our doorsteps.
 
Someday you will be elderly. Good luck.
While your cold dead body will have long exhausted SS before I get there I will have comfort in the knowledge that you borrowed it for me to pay back while you to sat on your ass and shitposted about immigrants.
 
You are all deadbeat dads living on your kids and your kid's kids benevolence. Borrowing from our future and paying yourself social security you didnt earn.

:oops8:
 
15th post
I'm not on SS, Boomer. Besides, SS is the Democrats' crown jewel. Are you calling for the end of SS? :popcorn:
Then what are you arguing about if you are not a boomer? The boomers left a $30T deficit, are whining about working immigrants, and siphoning our budget with their federally funded healthcare no one else has, and they are getting a paycheck from the rest of us. Sweet deal for a bunch of racist xenophobes.
 
Congrats Boomers! You win. You have accumulated more stuff than anyone AND you have set up more government perks than anyone according to a new Wall Street Journal article.

Today’s Boomers have tilted the economy towards themselves and saddled younger generations with their debt and payouts and the cost is swallowing the budget.



View attachment 1220613
As of the third quarter of last year, people 70 and over controlled roughly 39% of all equities and mutual funds owned by households, compared with 22% in 2007, according to Federal Reserve data. Their share of net worth—assets minus debts—was 32%, up from 20% two decades earlier.

This is good news: there has never been a better time in America to be old. Yet it also exposes our disjointed national priorities. We keep pouring resources into making the elderly comfortable and happy when the economy’s pressure points lie elsewhere.

The elderly are mostly out of the job market and thus need not worry about being replaced by artificial intelligence. The majority own their homes, often debt-free. Everyone worries about health costs, but the elderly have publicly funded Medicare. None of this is true for the younger generations.

The cost is swallowing the budget. Federal spending on elderly programs has risen from 6.9% of gross domestic product in 2007 to 9.4% last year and will reach 11.3% in a decade, the Congressional Budget Office projects.

That is where the real threat to intergenerational harmony lies. Elderly programs, plus interest, are the primary driver of the gaping budget deficit. By 2032, Social Security will no longer be able to pay full benefits. Fixing the deficit and Social Security requires some combination of higher taxes or lower future benefits, both of which will largely spare today’s elderly. If you think the young are anxious now, just wait.

View attachment 1220612View attachment 1220614
Of course we had a life time to save and invest
 
Of course we had a life time to save and invest

My wife retired last year, I retired this year but have delayed starting SS until later in the year.

My wife is proof positive that you should marry someone smarter than youself.

Because of her hard work over DECADES we will have multiple income streams in retirement and of course SS is a major factor in our retirement plan. I've done some napkin calculations and because we have multiple other revenue streams a 25% decrease in SS (if it hits in the 2030's) will result in a 7% decrease in income.

That's survivable without a big change in standard of living. We could tighten our belts a little or skim off a little from investments where we had planned on letting DIV/INT compound until RMD age.

I pitty current and near current seniors who are barely making ends meet without the financial flexibility.

WW

[EDIT: Come to think of it, right about the time SS is projected to decrease by 25% is right about the time we hit RMD age anyway. Still working on changing mindset from "working toward" retirement and actually "being in" retirement.]

W
 
Back
Top Bottom