Are the names of European nations derogatory?

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
The name of the French came from the rule of the Franks, the Germans from the rule of the Germans, the name Deutschland is an atavism "land of the Deutsches"(most likely Daenen), Russians mean belonging to the people Ruses, the ethnonym "Slavs" most likely corresponds to the name of slaves, and "Serbs" to the name of servants. Names like Hungary, Italy, Switzerland do not have this possessive meaning.
And since all nations are now considered free and sovereign, wouldn't it be better to get rid of this heavy imperial legacy?
 
The name of the French came from the rule of the Franks, the Germans from the rule of the Germans, the name Deutschland is an atavism "land of the Deutsches"(most likely Daenen), Russians mean belonging to the people Ruses, the ethnonym "Slavs" most likely corresponds to the name of slaves, and "Serbs" to the name of servants. Names like Hungary, Italy, Switzerland do not have this possessive meaning.
And since all nations are now considered free and sovereign, wouldn't it be better to get rid of this heavy imperial legacy?
Why?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Rename. Why not? The French are not Franks, and they are not under the jurisdiction of the Franks. For example. Why should they remember slavery?
For example, they can restore the old name of the Gauls. Gallia Celtica
 
Last edited:
Rename. Why not? The French are not Franks, and they are not under the jurisdiction of the Franks. For example. Why should they remember slavery?
For example, they can restore the old name of the Gauls. Gallia Celtica
THIS is what you think of, when the world is a tragedy?
Yer a Karen. A Cancel Culture Vulture. You must be a liberal. Got pink hair too?
 
THIS is what you think of, when the world is a tragedy?
Yer a Karen. A Cancel Culture Vulture. You must be a liberal. Got pink hair too?
not.
This plays into the hands of the left, because imperialism is left-wing politics. When the left destroys the identity and history of peoples, they identify them with their power and thus use them.
 
.....The French are not Franks, .....
Some of them used to be, but they moved to America and founded a settlement behind the Green Monster in Fenway Park, Boston.



1634469923855.png
 
read the title carefully.
lol. I read it but not carefully since it's a really stupid question. But you go ahead and muse/ponder/mull over more stupid questions like this one if it floats yer boat.
Post stupid shit, you will get called on it.

Now here is a humdinger for ya:
Are chickens animals or birds? And perhaps I should start it in the political forum?

Duh
 
The name of the French came from the rule of the Franks, the Germans from the rule of the Germans, the name Deutschland is an atavism "land of the Deutsches"(most likely Daenen), Russians mean belonging to the people Ruses, the ethnonym "Slavs" most likely corresponds to the name of slaves, and "Serbs" to the name of servants. Names like Hungary, Italy, Switzerland do not have this possessive meaning.
And since all nations are now considered free and sovereign, wouldn't it be better to get rid of this heavy imperial legacy?

First question? How does one GET RID OF A LEGACY/HISTORY? Simply redefine it? :eusa_think: All history is important.......attempting to hide from it results in nothing but IGNORANCE. If you do not know history........you are doomed to making the same mistakes made in the past. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly must remain for the benefit of the future.

Why? The only ones that appear to be upset about labels are the one's that demand LABELS be removed by "relabeling" them according to their free will, a will that's always in the minority. What about the 99% that are totally ignorant of the sins of their fathers and are satisfied with living their lives IN FREEDOM under the current label?

Question? How is the demand for a NEW LABEL promoting freedom? Its not.......its promoting FASCISM under the guise of political correctness. When any minority forces their will upon the minority........the only result possible is despotism, dictatorship or glass rule via an "Oligarchy"......every class ruled over by those who self profess to be ELITE. There is no such animal as a "TYRANICAL MAJORITY" in a free republic.....as its the majority that establishes all the social mores' and reflect those mores' in LAW. There is not one right........civil or otherwise that is not the direct result of a MAJORITY ratification process in this republic called the United States of America.

What makes YOUR OPINION SO ELITE? :dunno: Have you ever considered and contemplated Article Four, Section Four, Clause One of the Untied States Constitution?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top