Are Rich Hollywood, Sports, Music, And Other Celebrities Any Different Than Rich CEO's?

Not just to Elon but to all makers of electric cars. But Elon is perfectly okay with Trump ending that $7500 subsidy given every American who buys an electric car. He (Elon) will likely again reduce the price of Teslas but will hope to continue to have good productivity with increased sales. Most of Elon's profits with Tesla are overseas anyway where the $7500 subsidy doesn't apply.
They seem to have a hardon for Elon, ever since he bought Twitter. Joining team Trump sent them over the edge. He's a bad billionaire. In contrast to their good billionaires, Oprah, Pritzker, Bloomberg ...
 
You can choose if you want to buy a Tesla or not. You can choose to order from Amazon or not. You can choose if you want health inurance or not or what health insurance company you want.
If I purchase insurance from a healthy insurance company then it's up to them to cover my claims. I don't understand denying claims. Isn't that why we buy insurance?
 
If I purchase insurance from a healthy insurance company then it's up to them to cover my claims. I don't understand denying claims. Isn't that why we buy insurance?
They don’t want to pay out anymore than they have to. You can be sure they have teams of accountants scrutinizing every claim looking for every loophole they can find.
 
If I purchase insurance from a healthy insurance company then it's up to them to cover my claims. I don't understand denying claims. Isn't that why we buy insurance?
There are many reasons for denied claims. Denying a claim is not a capital offense worthy of the death penalty.
 
There are many reasons for denied claims. Denying a claim is not a capital offense worthy of the death penalty.
Not saying it is. Its wrong. so dont get defensive. If I pay for insurance then the company should only deny the blatantly obvious bad claims. Everything else is automatically covered.
 
The left are constantly railing against mulit-millionaire and billionaire CEO's, constantly claiming that they got rich off the backs of working people but doesn't that also apply to millionaire and billionaire Hollywood, sports, music, and other celebrities? Don't they get rich off the backs of working people as well? I won't mention any particular names due to recent events but there are several multi-millionaire or billionaire Hollywood, sports, music, and other celebrities who wouldn't be rich but for taking huge sums of money off the backs of working people. Why do they get a pass but company CEO's don't?
Certainly you should be able to tell the difference.
Sorry that you can't.

I LOVE Sports, Music, and Entertainment. My Choice.
I am NOT one of those that boycott shit because someone made it political.
If I want to spend $100 per ticket to go Listen to music, your political views aren't going to sway me.
If I want to travel to another City and see a ball game, that's MY Choice.
I went to Pittsburgh and Detroit this summer....well worth MY money.

AS much as I love Sports, these athletes are OVERPAID. Sorry, I have my opinion.
CEO's, same feeling, overpaid.
 
You mean they don't get rich from the little people paying them super high prices for their product?
Agreed that they, Major Athletes and Major Entertainers, are overpaid, but they EARN it.
You suck and you NEVER reach that level.
Not every athlete or entertainer earns $100 Million.
Those that do, they earned it, (Disclaimer **** still too much $$$$ )
 
Not saying it is. Its wrong. so dont get defensive. If I pay for insurance then the company should only deny the blatantly obvious bad claims. Everything else is automatically covered.
While I haven't personally had any real issues with health insurance companies over a 50 year period that I can remember, I did know someone once who worked for one and at that time they were paid bonuses for denying grey area claims, hoping the insureds wouldn't fight it.
 
I'm sure there are lots of similarities, but the main difference is athletes and Hollywood types made and maintain their riches by supplying entertainment that each of their fans can individually choose whether they will pay for. If the public doesn't like them, their money goes away. CEOs make theirs by manipulating the market and taking advantage of loopholes and grants that aren't available to the average person. They don't have to satisfy the public. They just have to satisfy the small number of people that regulate their business. Fewer regulations mean a smaller amount of people for them to satisfy.
No one forces you to buy their products and or services. What are you babbling about?
 
Certainly you should be able to tell the difference.
Sorry that you can't.

I LOVE Sports, Music, and Entertainment. My Choice.
I am NOT one of those that boycott shit because someone made it political.
If I want to spend $100 per ticket to go Listen to music, your political views aren't going to sway me.
If I want to travel to another City and see a ball game, that's MY Choice.
I went to Pittsburgh and Detroit this summer....well worth MY money.

AS much as I love Sports, these athletes are OVERPAID. Sorry, I have my opinion.
CEO's, same feeling, overpaid.
And, if you buy things on Amazon that is your choice. If you buy a Tesla that is your choice. If you use a bank that is your choice. If you have health insurance, that is your choice.
 

Forum List

Back
Top