I had this bookmarked. this is what we tried to tell people. It's on a site I know the left won't like, but if anyone is interested in reading it.... Make sure you read the comment section. a lot of information about Obama and the communist party of the United States, etc and then you decide. the original article was off the American Thinker and the link for it is there also
SNIP:
Why Is Observing Obama As A Marxist Verboten?
American Thinker ^ | 03/22/2012 | Bill Flax
Posted on
‎3‎/‎22‎/‎2012‎ ‎2‎:‎23‎:‎29‎ ‎AM by
billflax
The recent release of a tape by Andrew Breitbart's outfit sparked renewed interest in President Obama's murky past. In anticipation, conservatives were elated that the president might finally be exposed. The tape showed Obama, then at Harvard Law, orchestrating a protest on behalf of Derrick Bell.
Without providing any background on just how radical is Professor Bell, the compliant liberal media derisively dismissed it all as conservative paranoia, even proclaiming presidential vindication. It still appears preposterous to purport that America elected a communist ideologue. The world's greatest beneficiary of capitalist bounty would never willingly empower a radical socialist to "fundamentally transform America."
Unfortunately, we did, even if Americans loathe admitting it. And this ought to have been obvious even before Mr. Breitbart's valiant efforts.
Obama exploits the citizenry's concerted blindness, cloaking his views under veneers of "social justice," "fairness," and "progress." Unadulterated Marxism attracts few votes. In rare candor, sans teleprompter, Obama lectured Joe the Plumber that his prescription for widespread prosperity is "spreading the wealth around."
Before catapulting to prominence, the president complained that thanks to constraints instituted by our Founders, "The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice." Obama's justice ensures not that transactions are freely entered and fairly measured, but that bureaucrats enforce results fancied per the fluttering fashions of political correctness.
Still, most Americans would deny Obama's Marxist outlook, mistaking the term's meaning as synonymous with Stalin or Mao. Marxist theory informed many of history's most murderous tyrants, but Obama's brand is the emasculated theorizing of the faculty lounge.
He neither intends similar mayhem nor has such means in our constitutional republic. (That last statement in bold is one that I and a lot of people disagree with. Are we seeing rioting, lootings, police hunted down and killed, etc)
all of it here WITH comments
Why Is Observing Obama As A Marxist Verboten?